THE COPSORATION OF THE CITY OF Port COQUITLAM

MEMORANDUM NOY 25 1085

TO: Be. Kirk

November 21, 1985 City Administrator

FROM: F.E. Peters, P, Eng., City Engineer

SUBJECT; Consultants for Mary Hil] Design - Works and Services Committee November 19, 1985

Recommendation:

Cin | proceeds with construction) be awarded To

Proposal with the addition of street light

and that the costs be taken From the High Cost Charge Reserve,

design for the future road way facilities Development

Mary Hil! Road in These have been

With the exception of the AoE. S.L, Proposal which igs for a maximum cost, the others are al} estimated costs based on thea: consultants evaluation of the amount of work to be done, The actual! costs of these others could, of course, vary Significantiy if their estimate of design hours is incorrect, The lowest estimate js given by McElhanney Engineering but-we have identified items that have been excluded from t+His estimate. These missing items have a value of at least $12,000 as estimated in the A.E.S.L. Proposal, it would therefore not be prudent to award the design of the basis of the given cast estimate.

Our evaluation of the Proposals indicates that A.E.S.L. has the

best overa! | Proposal, They are also a firm which has done previous work for us and has completed the work to our complete satistaction, We are therefore very happy to

Our request for Proposal did not cal] lighting for this section of road. However, the street lighting at this time would be yv

ARR ae ee

TINS ante tts need ioeebtr ea