ode
Do you think there is sufficient Provisions for Senior Citizen's housing
and Empty Nesters?

Not enough — } respondent
sufficient - 10 respondents

Do you think there is sufficient provision for multi-family townhouses?

Sufficient - 9 respondents
Too much - 2 respondents

Do you think there is sufficient provisions for Single family housing?

Sufficient - 10 respondents
Not enough ~ j respondent

Are you in favour of large lots, small lots or a combination of both?

Combination of both ~ 10 respondents
Small lots - 1 respondent

Do you think there are enough schools planned for this area?
Yes - 11 respondents
How would you like to see the parks developed?

An area for children, foot trajls, bike trails, tennis courts,
playing fields; ag per mmicipal standards.

De you sgrce with setting a Mandatory Development Permit Area for
Riverwood?

Yee — 10 respondents
No answer = } respondent

Additional Comments:
Lets get this project going — 9 respondents
Sennie Place to remain a cul-de-sac ~ 1 respondent

Keep "Natural Country Look", Protect large trees ~ 1 respondent
Concern about noise and burning at construction time - 1 respondent.

DISCUSSION:

The comments received during the Public information Meeting generally
support the proposed 0.C.P. designations for the Riverwood Area.

lands