ode Do you think there is sufficient Provisions for Senior Citizen's housing and Empty Nesters? Not enough — } respondent sufficient - 10 respondents Do you think there is sufficient provision for multi-family townhouses? Sufficient - 9 respondents Too much - 2 respondents Do you think there is sufficient provisions for Single family housing? Sufficient - 10 respondents Not enough ~ j respondent Are you in favour of large lots, small lots or a combination of both? Combination of both ~ 10 respondents Small lots - 1 respondent Do you think there are enough schools planned for this area? Yes - 11 respondents How would you like to see the parks developed? An area for children, foot trajls, bike trails, tennis courts, playing fields; ag per mmicipal standards. De you sgrce with setting a Mandatory Development Permit Area for Riverwood? Yee — 10 respondents No answer = } respondent Additional Comments: Lets get this project going — 9 respondents Sennie Place to remain a cul-de-sac ~ 1 respondent Keep "Natural Country Look", Protect large trees ~ 1 respondent Concern about noise and burning at construction time - 1 respondent. DISCUSSION: The comments received during the Public information Meeting generally support the proposed 0.C.P. designations for the Riverwood Area. lands