By STANLEY RYERSON Frou Monklands, the Govern- Ors residence in the western at Fla of Montreal, the Earl aes gin and Kincardine penned th of his regular dispatches to ® Colonial Office. Dated May 4, “pg” it closed with the words: *S. It is the Irish not the French ™m whom we have the most to fad at present.” ars hoble Earl, it seems, “fear- of mon between the followers €Pineau and the Irish canal Orkers.» : 1848 was the year in which ate Street finally yielded to ae Canadian demand for “re- Mee government.” Elgin Bes the governor who -presided a ‘eas inauguration. The Irish al Workers — what of them? =i were co-founders of Canada, tins ~ Dart in its official history i: itherto been kept buried in sil €reet — and dishonest — nce, aoe watery pap fed to us (and off ur children still) was to the ment that responsible govern- ind) and Confederation were the Peri Y gifts of broadminded im- zt authorities. There was no « S4Sh revolution, 1837 was an wont” lapse, and the Bites class (while graciously roa Se baa to build ‘cities,’ rail- kept ; canals and much else) was . In its proper place—well off sae Stage of “ordered constitu- al development.” Ae fact of the matter is that State founding of the Canadian only ‘ia 1867 was made possible Popu} y three decades of great arid struggles: the defeated Ss of 1837-38 in Upper and the . Canada and, in the forties, of ‘Uuccessful people’s coalition oa €nch and English-speaking. ig mers headed by Louis H. Pack ine and Robert Baldwin, rhe by mass strike struggles in, nee forerunners of the modern Strial working class. first © coming to office of the Win’ Short-lived Lafontaine-Bald- i Ministry in 1842-3—a prelude sibilit Winning of cabinet respon- ehinnt five years later—was ac- fough Shed by a series of bitterly Works Strikes, waged by the ' ay on the Lachine and Beau- f Canals against a wage cut day" three to two shillings a dr When the poverty-stricken im- ane Irish workers struck, the diang brought in French-Cana- break from the nearby farms, to tactj, the strike. Instead of the ly the resulting in success, short- Wom cafter the French Canadian €rs struck as well. thes € Reform movement in Mon- sin... or Sanized mass meetings to the ort the strike. The unity of ‘4 Middle class Reformers and +p, ©2nal workers, together with * alliance of the Reform forces 4 Whole in French and English de*%a, forced the granting of the able for a government answer- to the elected representa- Of the people. the 1 On the St. Lawrence and time Wer Lakes, so in the Mari- Coagy PToVinces and on the Pacific force, 8 coalition of democratic broke the resistance of autocracy and “Family - privilege. Howe ae h smos, together with the “Toes of '37 and the Reform tives ~ S “Olonial D Mp act »” \ of expanding Labor, the nation, and... The Canadian _ dream \ leaders of the forties in central Canada, are to be accounted among the founders of the Cana- dian state. ~ The British North American colonies might have been united, administratively, by the British imperial authorities earlier or later than in 1867. But, for Con- federation to mark, as it did, a milestone on the road to inde- pendence, the birth of modern Canada—there had to be the cour- age and_ self-sacrifice of the martyrs of 37, the persevering campaigns and mass petitions, the parliamentary people’s coalition of 1848. It was militant people’s strug- gle than won the democratic lib- erties which were to be implicit in the Act of 1867. It was the people’s vision of “a new nation- ality”—an independent Canada— which breathed life into the dry legislative formulas of the Brit- ish North America Act. * Against this background of struggle, the part played by the ““Wathers of Confederation” is not lessened: it is simply better un- derstood. ‘ Compared with the people’s tribunes of 20 years before, the men who met at Charlottetown and Quebec in 1865 were of a somewhat different calibre. Yet the measure of their stature is that, although capitalists and capitalist politicians, they had the imagination, energy and audacity to found a Dominion reaching from the Atlantic head- lands to the shores of the Pacific. Their vision of what Canada could become, their acting upon it and securing the adoption of the British North America Act, July 1, 1867, constituted an achievement that was truly his- toric. Without it, the Canada of today would not have been. “Whereas the provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, have expressed their desire to be federally united in- to one Dominion under the Crown . . . with a constitution similar in principle to that of the United Kingdom. . . 2 : So opens the BNA Act; its provision for “the eventual ad-. mission into the Union of other parts of British North America” being met in 1870 by Manitoba; 1871, British Columbia; 1873, Prince Edward Island; 1905, Al- berta and Saskatchewan; 1948, Newfoundland and Labrador. Certainly, the state that John A. MacDonald and Galt, Cartier and Brown and their colleagues fashioned in 1865-67 was a capl- talist state, to serve the interests capitalism. But in that day the capitalist class was still national, able and ready to promote national aims—not the least of these being the devel- opment of the productive forces on a colossal scale. The National Policy of promot- ing Canadian manufactures was first put forward by MacDonald in Hamilton in 1872; it was sup- ported, as in the interest of pro- gress and the nation, by the in- dustrial workers, then first org- enizing a national movement in the struggle for the nine-hour day. * Whiie not prepared to raise forthrightly the banner of inde- pendence, the men who wrought Confederation had a vision of Canadian nationhood, and stood up for its defense against the threat of U.S. annexation. For instance, Alexander Galt: ‘I believe the day for inde- pendence will come. . . . We must guard our right and not be put in a position of inferior- , ity to the United States. f wholly repudiate the idea that this country is in any way sub- ordinate or ought to be sub- ordinate to the United States.” Declaring that Confederation “will raise us from the position of mere dependent colonies to a new and more important posi- tion,” D’Arey MeGee stressed the urgency and imminence of what ‘he called “the American warn- _ ing.” Together with the U-S. raising barriers to trade, went “the enor- mous expansion of the American army and navy.” Of the vast increases in U.S. armaments, Mc- Gee said: “These are frightful figures for the capacity of destruction they represent . . . for the lust of conquest that they represent... for the arrest of the onward progress of civilization that they represent.” Equally sérious was “the change that has come over the spirit, mind and principles of the (U.S.) people, that terrible change which has made war fam- iliar and even attractive to them.” And he spoke of “the mushroom millionaires, well-named a shoddy aristocracy.” : If his description of the threat of U.S. militarism has a ring of actuality about it now, so has a Bill introduced into the House of ‘Representatives in 1866. It provided “that the States of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Canada East and Canada West, and the Territories of Selkirk, Saskatchewan and Columbia, with limits and rights as by this Act defined, are constituted and ad- mitted as States and Territories ot the USA.” The Bill, among other things, arranged for the U.S. taking over in effect “the navigation of the St. Lawrence River” — “by the construction of new canals, or the enlargement of existing can- als . . . provided, that the ex- penditure under this article shall not exceed fifty millions of dol- lars.” Generous souls! The Bill, however, did not reach consummation. The temper of the Canadian people, and the establishment of a united Cana- dian state, acted as deterrents. Reinforcing these was the soli- darity of the labor and demo- cratic forces in’ both countries. . Tens of thousands of Canadians had enrolled under Lincoln’s ban- ners in the military struggle against the slave power. And when Galt had met with the presi- dent in the midst of the Civil War, he was able in a memoran- dum to Ottawa to report Lin- coln’s attitude in these words: “He had implicit faith in the steady conduct of the American people, even under the trying circumstances of the war, and though the existence of large armies had in other countries placed successful generals in Positions of arbitrary power, he did not fear this result, but be- lieved the people would quietly resume their peaceful avoca- _ tion .. . he pledged himself as a man of honor, that neither he nor his cabinet entertained the slightest aggressive designs up- on Canada.” _Later, in new conditions, the “American warning” would loom over Canada again; but that was to be in the time of the twilight of imperialism—and the dawning of a new epoch, when the bright banners of emancipation would Continued on page M7 SONG about a British Col- ‘umbia strike composed by the deathless working class song writer, Joe Hill, has been discovered in a university lib- rary: Heh sal PVN Sat ean Cd I baal Si The song, entitled “Where the Fraser River Flows,” put to the music of “Where the Shannon River Flows,” was written for the Canadian Northern Railway strikers in 1912. In that year, construc- tion workers pushing the line through to the Coast, struck against intolerable conditions. Chorus: pay, boys; flows. flows. [Repeat Chorus] them, [Repeat Chorus] Joe Hill, the Swedish immi- grant who became an organ- izer for the IWW in the Unit- ed States, was framed on a murder charge by the copper trust in Utah. The campaign for his release spread through- out the U.S. and Canada and across the seas to Europe and Australia. The Swedish government in- tervened with the U.S. govern- ment on his behalf after re- viewing the evidence. And President Woodrow Wilson ap- pealed to the governor of Where the Fraser River flows ~ edition of the IWW Song Bock” Fellow workers pay attention to what I’m going to mention, For it is the fixed intention of the Workers of ithe World. And | hope you'll all be ready, true-hearted, brave and steady, To gather ‘round our standard when the Red Flag is unfurled. Where the Fraser River flows, each fellow worker knows They have bullied and oppressed us, but still our Union grows, And we’re going to find a way, boys, for shorter hours and And we're going to win the day, For these gunny-sack contractors have all been dirty actors, And they’re not our benefactors, each fellow worker knows, So we've got to stick together in fine or dirty weather, And we'll show no white feather, where the Fraser River Now the boss the law is stretching, bulls and pimps he’s fetching, And they are a fine collection, as Jesus only knows. But why their mothers reared them, and why the devil spared Are questions we can’t answer, where the Fraser River flows. * Leadership of the strike was provided by travelling organ- izers of the Industrial Workers of the World. ; The song was found in an popularly known as “The Little Red Song Book.” This partic- ular copy bears the name of the Lumber Workers Industrial Union, No. 500, Spokane, Wash- ington. It is now in posses- sion of the University of Wash- ington. library. Following are the words of the song: boys, where the Fraser River Utah to save his life after the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed® the death sentence. The gov- ernor refused. On November 19, 1915, Hill died in Salt Lake City before a firing squad to which he him- self gave the order, “Fire.” But, in the words of the song made famous by Paul Robeson, Joe Hill never really died. His last words, “Don’t mourn, or- ganize,” ‘have rung around the world and his songs are sung wherever labor fights for its rights. PACIFIC TRIBUNE MAGAZINE SECTION — JUNE 25, 1954 — PAGE }