1 BEY

(6) Screening along Mary Hill Bypass and Kingsway

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Section (4)(d), Rear Yard Regulations of the M~1
General Industrial Regulations of the Zoning Bylaw
Noe2240 may be varied or supplemented by a
development permit to require a 7 metre rear yard
setback along Mary Hil! Bypass and Kingsway Road
where properties back onto these two roads.

Alternatives for screening of view of rear yards
from Mary HIi! Bypass and Kingsway Road are to vary
or supplement by development permit the requirements
of Section (4)(@), Rear Yard Regulations of the M-1
General Industrial Regulations of the Zoning Bylaw
No.2240;

1) Construction of a solld tence 2 metres tn
nel ght

11) Construction of a combination of a solid fence
and landscape berm to a combined height of 2
metres

Tit) Construction of a berm and Instal¥ ation of
trees and shrubs providing a visual screen of
2 metres In height.

Section (4)(c), Front Yard Regulations of the Zoning
Bylaw No.2240 may be varied or supplemented by a
development permit to require a 7 metre front yard
setback along Mary Hil! Bypass and Kingsway Road
where properties front onto elther road.

Aiternative landscaping requirements for properties
fronting onto these two roads are to vary or
supplement by development permit the requirements of
section (4)(c) (II). The alternatives are;

1) Section (4)(e) (TI) of the M-1 Genera!
Industrial Regulations, or

li) installation of a combination of trees and
shrubs to a density of 1 tree per each 12
square meters of required front yard and |
shrub per each 5 square meters of required
front yard.

Alternatives for landscaping properties fronting
Mary Hill Bypass or Kingsway Road are:

i) compliance with Section 4(e) (iT) of the Mej,
General Industrial Regulations; or

if) provision of a combination of trees and shrubs
at a density of one tree for each 12 square
metres of required front yard and one shrub
° for each 5 square metres of required front

yard. le ;