May 27th, 1974

hall construction rather than just three as shown on the map acconpanying the re~
port, and the following resolution was then proposed :

Hoved by Alderman Habbect

Seconded hy Alderman Ranger:

the report of the Building & Protection Committee, May 23rd, 1974, con-

fire hall site on the North side of the City, be approved in its entirety.

Carried.
Aldernan Thompson voted against the resolution.

the Building & : Protection Committee, “May 22nd, 1974, stating that the Bldg.& Prot.
Conm.re non-
conforming
signs

agreed non-conforming signs be renoved a as set out in the Sign-By-law,
that is, those non-c onforming on June 23, 1969 and non-conforming at the June 22,
1973 By-law will be 3 renoved nowt, ‘and those non-conforming at the time of the 1973
By-law will be removed on January 22nd, 1978; further, that all sign permits will
be reviewed to determine which are slated for ‘removal fo meet the Sign By-law re-
quirements. The report was ‘received for information. Mr. oN, “chernof, Senior
Building Inspector, was present at the meeting and gave several examples af f signs
that would be affected by the By-law provisions.

From the City Clerk, May 13th, 1974, submit ting a copy of Sign By-law Amend- ‘City Clerk:
: Sign B/law |
ment No. 1320 prepared by the Solicitor at the request of. the Build ing Inspector, Amend «#1320
non-conform
use in A-l,
. -A-2 or RS=2
CS use in an A-1, A-2, or RS-2 Zone to change - or upgrade its sign in accord with Zones

and advising that the intent of the amendment is to parmit a non-conforming C or
the sign regulations existing for C or CS Zone signs, but would not permit the
establishment of any new signs for hon-conforming uses.

Alderman Ranger introduced a Ey-law. to amend the “City of Por: Coquitlam Sien
By-iaw, 1969, Ho. 936",

Moved by Alderman Ranger:

Sign Amend

Bflaw #1320
ist 3. read-
ings .

Seconded. by Alderman Mabbett:

That. By-law No, 1320 be read a First time. . : Carried.

Prior to passage of the resolution quoted above, the Senior Building Inspector
gave. several examples of situations that would be assisted or improved by the pra-
visions of the Amendment By-law. |.

‘loved by Alderman Thompson:

Seconded by Alderman Traboulay:

That By-law No. 1320 be read a second time. - Carried,

Moved by Alderman Laking:

Seconded by Alderman Keryluk:

That By-law No. 1320 be read a third time.