LABOR ———e ~ Marine workers won’ By CLAIRE DaSYLVA SOREL, Que. — Frustrated and angry because of the Quebec Government’s refusal to intervene in their seven-month-long strike against Marine Industries Ltd., hundreds of shipyard workers drove Parti Québecois justice minister Pierre Marc Johnson out of town, March 24. Johnson, widely touted as a possible heir-apparent to the ailing Premier René Levesque, was greeted with boos and pelted with eggs by the more than 600 strikers, whose local is affiliated to the Confederation of National Trade Unions (CSN). The banging of tables and chairs on the floor of the meeting hall symbolized the frustration of the strikers who, since walking off the job last August, have been waging a bitter fight against MIL’s concessionary de- mands that attack the workers’ job security, wages and working conditions. Right now, union executive member Regeant Verrault told Combat, the Tribune’s sister paper in Quebec, can- cellation of the company’s suspension of seven strikers, all of them rank and file leaders of the strike, is the top priority if the dispute is ever to be turned toward a settlement. Surrendering to this obvious threat to their union, the CSN leaders point out, will just open the door to more company attacks on union members. One of the seven has been cleared of responsibility for the events relating to a picket line fracas last fall, while it has been established that two of the others suspended weren't even on the picket line when the incidents took place. : Job Security Job security was the number one issue for 30- and 40-year veterans of MI interviewed at the union hall in Tracey. Euclide Roy, a pipefitter with 30 years seniority, told Combat he was worried about the future and about his family who depend on his pay cheques. MIL is pushing a ‘‘job flexibility’’ program that will force workers to do any job the company pleases whether or not it is covered by their particular trade. Many trades are being displaced by the scheme, Roy pointed out. Some trades have been cut in half over the past few years. The CSN and the company have an agreement that provides for an arbitration committee whose decisions aren't binding, but which over the next year will try to iron out the differences between the union and MIL over the job flexibility program. PHOIO —CUMBAI Striking pipefitter Euclide Roy (right) is worried about his future, , while local union executive member Regeant Verrault (left) says company could swiftly end conflict. Verreault says the union will try to ensure the workers have the final say in the process, but he’s convinced MIL was already committed to rationalizing the workforce when it signed its latest ship refitting contracts. With the current contracts on hand, the union leader points out, the company could hire 2,500 more workers than it currently employs. Yet with the new flexibility system, MIL will only need to hire 240 workers for every thousand it normally would have needed. Roy confided that the union has believed from the start of contract talks that MIL is planning to get out of shipbuilding altogether in order to focus, production exclusively or turbines and railway cars. If Prime Minister Mulroney’s recent talk about revis- ing government aid to the shipbuilding industry means anything, Roy’s speculation may be right. All-Time Low Yet, despite these promises and the government's current warship building program, even Mulroney ad- mits that employment in Canada’s shipyards is at an all-time low. And, Ottawa has already threatened to withdraw its contract to refit naval destroyers at Sorel because of the lengthy strike. The union is demanding concessions of its own from the company. It wants a reduction of the work week from 40 to 37'2 hours with no loss in take home pay, the ending of compulsory overtime, and compensation for overtime worked, with extra time off the job. t bow to pressure — Wages aren’t the main issue in the strike, union of- ficials say, but the workers aren’t about to swallow what amounts to a $40 a week cut in wages. The last three-year — contract was to provide the workers with an 11 per cent wage hike, butilast summer MIL scrapped the contract and decided to impose the federal 6 and 5 per cent wage guidelines. ‘That was the straw that broke the camel’s back,” Verreault told Combat. In a secret ballot the workers overwhelmingly rejected MIL’s contract offer. While they aren’t looking for heavy increases, the workers are determined to protect the buying power of their current wages. The union estimates the total cost of its demands as a little less than $11 million. It also believes the strike has already cost MIL nearly $100-million, including money | the company has shelled out to a private security agency calling itself Don McCleary and Associates of Montreal. Determination, Solidarity They’ ve been on the company payroll since before the strike began, all with the blessings of the Quebec Government through its ‘‘Societé générale du financement,’ which owns 65 per cent of Marine Indus- tries Ltd. Combat has learned that former mountie Donald McCleary, while in the RCMP, was among those who authorized the 1972 barn burning incident in the force’s activities against the FLQ, following the October crisis. — McCleary’s anti-union and anti-people record has the union convinced his services are being used by MIL to spy on the workers and their families with a view to breaking the union. The strikers reaffirmed their determination to win a no-concessions pact with another vote, March 13, endorsing the strike. Solidarity from throughout Quebec and sections of the union movement in the rest of Canada has been generously given. Jean-Claude Parrot, on behalf of the 23,000-member Canadian Union of Postal Workers, recently presented a — financial contribution and messages of solidarity to the” strikers from his union. ¢ So far, more than 300 organizations and groups from all walks of life within Quebec have rallied behind the’ strikers to demonstrate their moral and physical support for their just cause. o-strike bill — no way MONTREAL — More than one ‘million leaflets Accord near in UAW split TORONTO — At press time, the four-member United Auto Workers committee negotiating the Canadian section’s with- drawal from the international, announced that ‘‘a tentative agreement on major issues pertaining to the Canadian decision” had been reached. Union sources said the tentative pact, which will lead to the formation of a Canadian auto workers union, was endorsed by the UAW International Executive Board which met in Detroit March 22. The committee will continue to meet to iron out the remaining issues relating to the separation of the Canadian section from the international. Details of the accord were to be made public following consideration and approval by the Canadian UAW Council, slated to meet here March 30-31. Edmonton labor blasts Tory lies EDMONTON — Doug Elves, president of the Edmonton Labor Council, hammered the federal Tory government March 18 for scuttling the council’s bid through the Canada Works program to get funding to operate its five Unemployment Action Centres. ‘For the growing number of people falling through the badly- frayed UIC safety net, the lack of concern by the federal govern- ment for this country’s jobless is self-evident,’ Elves said. The council is writing to each of Edmonton’s Tory MPPs seeking a meeting to call the elected representatives to account for their government's lack of concern for the unemployed and to demand funds be found to re-open the Unemployment Action Centres. The official Edmonton jobless rate stands at 15 per cent, but labor estimates the real level could be as much as 10 per cent higher. ‘Mulroney was elected on the program of ‘jobs, jobs, jobs’,”” Elves said. ‘‘To this I reply: ‘lies, lies, lies’ .: 6 e PACIFIC TRIBUNE, APRIL 3, 1985 and 25,000 daffodils were distributed throughout Quebec during the March 20 Day of Protest or- ganized by the massive public sector unions’ coali- tion for the right to bargain. The daffodils symbolized both the coming of spring and more importantly, the solidarity of 366,000 public sector workers with the general pub- lic whose services they provide. The unions also called on the public to sign peti- tions endorsing the coalition’s demands and for the maintenance of good quality social services. The day of protest capped off a month of regional and local demonstrations and actions by the 19- organizations, including all four Quebec labor cen- trals, which make up the public sector coalition. It has rallied together a wide variety of public sector workers’ organizations, ranging all the way from teachers and nurses to police officers, jail guards and wild life wardens along with the traditional public sector unions to press the Parti Québecois government to back off of its plan for legislation that will effectively strip public sector workers of the right to bargain and the right to strike speci- fically over wages. ; Coalition leaders compare the legislation intro- duced last Christmas by Treasury Board president Michel Clair to the draconian edicts of the Duples- sis era, and say the measures will wipe out the collective bargaining system public sector workers have put in place over the past 20 years. On March 12 more than 6,000 public sector workers, and a few from the private sector as well, packed Montreal’s Paul Sauvé arena in a rally demanding that the right to negotiate be preserved. Speaker after speaker, representing the 19 organizations in the coalition, hammered on the different harmful aspects of the Clair Bill, and were unanimous in calling for its withdrawal. PHOTO — COMBAT More than 6,000 public sector workers packed pau! Sauvé arena March 12 to demand the right to ba” gain collectively and to say: ‘‘No to permanent af crees.” Some speakers, such as Confederation of N& tional Trade Unions president Gerald Larose, said the government is showing some signs that the coalition’s campaign is hitting home. However he said, the overtures are only verbal so far, and th government still hasn’t made any real concessions in its meetings with the coalition on the key issue> of the right to bargain and strike on’ wages, t linking of public sector wages to the genera lower private sector pay levels, decentraliziné negotiations, the unions’ right to information of bargaining and the right to negotiate all workiné conditions. The government has promised to bring dow? another bill at the beginning of April that will ade dress some of the issues raised by the coalitio™ However, nobody's expecting major improv! ments. As many in the public sector unions saying: ‘‘We’re not dreaming in technicolour.’ 7