September 27th, 1976

Prior tc passage of the foregoing resolution, a discussion ensued
erman Ranger inquired as to whether the applicants would be

required to construct the sidewalk which presently ends at 845 Prairie
Avenue along the frontage of the property proposed to be rezoned. The
City Engineer advised that this provision was not required as there was
no subdivision involved; however, it was generally agreed that the
applicant should construct the portion of sidewalk referred to by Alderman
Ranger, and the following. motion was proposed:

Moved by Alderman Ranger:

Seconded by Alderman Mabbett:

That the foregoing proposed resolution be amended by adding the
following at the end thereof:

"provided that the applicant construct at his own expense, a continuation
of the present sidewalk which ends at the Westerly boundary of his
property and 845 Prairie Road Eastward along the frontage of the portion
thereon to be rezoned."

Carried.

The question was then called on the motion of Aldermen Laking and
Traboulay, as amended:

That as recommended in a report from the Planning & Zoning Committee,
September 23rd, 1976, with respect to Application R#21/76, a portion of
the Wy of Lot D, NE% Section 6, Township 40, Plan 9737, fronting on
Prairie Road and measuring 60' x 128' be rezoned from RS-2 (One-Family
Suburban Residential) to RS—1 (One~Family Residential) for the purpose
of constructing a single family residence thereon; provided that the
applicant construct at his own expense, a continuation of the present
sidewalk which ends at the Westerly boundary of his property and 3845

Prairie Road Eastward along the frontage of the portion thereon to be

rezoned,

Carried.

The City Clerk advised that although it did not appear on the Agenda, Plann.& Zon.Comm.
re R#12/76 and

the Planning and Zoning Committee had a further item for consideration R#7/76 - Imperial
Ave. & Lougheed

respecting rezoning applications R#7/76 and R#12/76 and Alderman Laking Ganchnatia &
Dawson

then reported that a meeting had been held this afternoon with the

principles of R#12/76 to further discuss Council's earlier concerns

regarding the number of units to be constructed at one time and advised

that one of the main reasons the Developer did not want to phase the