| PRE | MEMORANDUM C 0 t N C ? A TO: Mayor and Council DATE: July 7th, 1977 JUL 14 1977. FROM: L.D. Pollock, City Administrator RE Park Fee John Dawson subdivision Imperial Avenue Council will recall arrangements made with John Dawson for the subdivision of approximately 30 lots between Imperial Avenue and Westminster Avenue. This subdivision along with the townhouse development to the south of Imperial were contributing jointly to the construction of a tennis court facility, the townhouse development contributing the land and John Dawson constructing the facility. At the time the subdivision was approved the council agreed that John Dawson would deposit with ‘the City the estimated cost of the tennis court facility and would construct this as part of his development. In exchange the special building permit fee for park purposes of $450 per lot (since increased to $800 per lot) would be waived. The developer has pointed out that the waiving of the parks fee does not particularly benefit him as it applies to the builder of the house not the subdivider of the land and therefore the waiving of the parks fee would benefit a third party. When the subdivision was first discussed the special building permit fee was $450 per unit and this would yield about $13,500. It was estimated that the cost of the tennis court facility would be about $25,000 and Mr. Dawson was prepared to absorb the cost over and above $13,500 as he felt he could construct the courts for considerably less than $25,000. It is evident now that the new special building permit fee will yield approximately $24,000 (equal to our estimated cost of con- Structing the tennis courts) and after further discussion with Mr. Dawson it would appear to be to the city's advantage to change the arrangements so that the special building permit fee will apply to all lots within the subdivision and from the proceeds of the fee the city should have ample funds to construct the tennis courts on the site provided by the townhouse development. This method solves the problems pointed out by Mr. Dawson in waiving the permit fee and also has a flexibility te permit council to construct some other facilities if it should be derided that tennis courts were not appropriate on this particular site. I would recommend that we change the procedure in this case to that described above. I believe that Mr. Dawson will be in attendance at Monday nights Council Meeting and he will be able to answer any questions council may have, . L.D. Pollock he a 4 Land MeN saab aa . aL i Se] DM st eH, 5 . ene