play into THE FILM version of Shakes- peare’s Julius Caesar is.a double triumph. It is a triumph for Shakespeare, whose study in power politics and demagogy comes across as an urgent, topical drama of tremend- ous power — fresh and compel- ling even though half the lines have found their way into the language as popular quotations. It is a triumph, too, for the director, Joseph L. Mankiewicz, who has made a great play into a fine film without losing the poetry and without merely photograph- ' ing a stage play. Mankiewicz is a first-rate direc- tor who has specialised in films with a preponderance of dialogue over action. In Julius Caesar he shows that moving the camera can give a new sense of tension and intimate insight into char- acter. He is magnificently, served by his actors. James Mason is a fine Brutus—the honest man who be- comes a tool of an ambitious clique. He manages to convey the qual- ity of character that makes Brutus the most respected man in Rome for his integrity, and handles Shakespeare’s words with real understanding. ° John Gielgud, too, is admirable _ as the waspish leader of the con- spirators, Cassius, who . envies Caesar’s power, schemes his mur- der and achieves a measure of dignity only when the game is up and the bid for Caesar’s power has failed. nae Most controversial piece of cast- ing is that of Marlon Brando as. Mark Antony, Caesar’s friend, who wins the allegiance of the Roman crowd with his calculated demagogy and makes’ war on Brutus and Cassius when Caesar has been murdered. meee This film establishes beyond doubt that Brando is an actor of great power. He establishes the character of Antony unforgettab- ly by his physical presence alone. XN , . SALSBERG URGES PRESSURE ON GOVERNMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF Julius Caesar--great tine film Shakespeare’s drama. an MARLON BRANDO | Actor of great power . The decision to give him the role was q bold stroke that justifies it- self, Yet while he ‘is undoubtedly one of the most powerful charac- ters in the film, he is one of those least happy with Shakespeare’s lines, and sacrifices a good deal of the poetry to gain his effects. In a long cast studded with wellknown players there are some pleasant surprises. Edmond 0Q’- Brien makes the small part of Casca, one of the conspirators, a telling piece of characterisation. Mankiewicz’s greatest success, however, is his crowd — one of the most important parts of It is -no mere bunch of extras but an animate, fickle group of individu- als who give the play its proper balance. In two hours this MGM version gives us Julius Caesar almost in- tact, with not much more than the odd scene of comic relief missing. It manfully resists the tempta- tion to add too much in the way ef spectacle, giving little more than a few battle scenes which are justified in rounding out the drama. : It is a fine achievement. —THOMAS SPENCER BOOKS o- ccc | Jet aircraft pioneer received little encouragement for ideas THE AUTHOR of Jet — the Story of a Pioneer, Sir Frank Whittle, is himself the inventor and pioneer of the jet engine (or more properly the gas turbine) in Britain. His achievement has been a major factor contributing to Brit- ain’s lead over the United States in civil aircraft. Sir Frank Whittle was born in 1907 of a working-class family living in Coventry, and at the age of 16 was accepted as an appren- tice to the RAF at Cranwell. When he was only 21 he was thinking in terms of aircraft fly- ing at 500 m.p.h:! His first proposals made to the British Air Ministry in 1929 for gas turbine propulsion were cool- ly received. However, Whittle patented his idea in 1930, but five years later he was able to renew it at a.cost of $25 out of his own pocket. : In the RAF he made good pro- gress, and after outstanding suc- cess in an officers’ engineering examination was sent to Cam- bridge. ig During this period work began on the jet engine and a company, Power Jets, was formed in 1935. Whittle was allowed to continue his work on his invention, and by . 1938 the engine was showing it- _ self to be a workable proposition. The air ministry placed a de- velopment contract,’ but | from ‘PERSONAL INTEGRITY’ This is the Short Sherpa, and the first to fly with an a new British iet now undergoing tests, “aero-isoclinic’ wing. Rotating wing tips replace conventional ailerons and elevators. then on Whittle was faced with obstacles and problems. Private companies to whom much of Power Jets’ work was sub-contracted were continually trying to get commercial advan- tage from the new development. At the same time civil servants placed obstacles in the way of de- veloping this jet engine. _ Most interesting of all is Whittle’s letter to Sir Stafford Cripps, then minister of aircraft production, in 1943, advocating nationalization of jet engine pro- duction. All that happened was nation- alization of Power Jets, which, in Whittle’s ewn words, resulted in DERELD its being “smothered .to death,” while large aircraft companies— Rolls-Royce, De Havilland, Arm- - strong-Siddeley—made large pro- fits from the production of en- gines based on Whittle’s inves- tions. ; The book is a little technical im parts —which could hardly be (avoided in telling the story of a very technical invention. It also presents a challenge te us all—how to ensure that the ability of men like Whittle is given full scope without the han- dicaps he experienced, and how to use such ideas for public good and not private profit—-ALLAN ROCKE. Librarians take stand against witch-hunting, support Marshall THE B.C. LIBRARY Association ~ took a strong stand against witch- hunting members of Greater Vic- toria Library Board on Sunday last week when it decided to in-_ form all library groups in Can- ada and the U.S. of the “personal integrity” of John Marshall, dis- missed bookmobile director of Victoria Public Library. At a special meeting here at- . tended by members from all parts of B.C. and including one mem- ber who came from Alberta, this resolution was adopted: .“Sound personnel procedures must imply the assumption that the employment or dismissal of any person shall be based only upon the competence fo perform the professional and technical duties involved and that any per- sonal beliefs become pertinent only when they interfere with the quality of the service rendered; “That we as an organization go on record as firmly believing in the Canadian ethical and legal concept that a man must be con- sidered innocent until he be prov- en otherwise and we highly de- precate and condemn the present attempt to damage a Person’s re- CULTURE ‘Why should National Ballet have to appeol for fina WHY SHOULD the National Ballet have to appeal for help to keep itself alive? This is the question J. B. Salsberg, LPP mem- ber of the Ontario legislature, asks in qa letter sent to news- papers across the country. And he points out the need for “gov- ernment aid that will make pos- sible the further development of a distinctly Canadian expression in the_arts.” Salsberg’s letter reads: , “The recent appeal for financial aid to the National Ballet Com- pany and the Toronto Symphony Orchestra prompts me to write _ this letter to your publication. _ “The appeals for help should, of course, meet with the warmest response but, it seems to me, that what we also need is quite a bit _ of indignation \and the directing of such indignation into positive and constructive channels. _ “Why should Miss Celia Franca have to appeal for help to keep: the National Ballet alive? Why should her company wander about from one building to an- ‘other because of the lack of a permanent studio? Yes, why should these and other hardships and indignities be forced upon the Ballet Company, the Toronto Symphony Orchestra, our dram- atic groups, painters, sculptors, composers and writers, in the richest province of our immense- ly rich country? Why, indeed? _ “I know that our Ontario situa- tion is not an isolated one and that the Massey Report contains a number of proposals to make things a bit easier for our strug- gling artists. But so far, nothing practical has come from the Mas- “sey Report’s minimum proposals. “Everyone concerned with the development of our artistic and cultural life must, of course, join hands in an effort to get action from Ottawa. But what of our own Ontario government? Why should it not assume a fair por- tion of responsibility for the de- velopment of our talents and the flowering of our arts? “I think that it should and 1 know. that it could well afford it, but I also know that it will require a lot ‘of public pressure to get it to do its evident duty. “This letter, as you see, is quite frankly an appeal to you and your readers to help develop an articulate and effective public demand on our provincial gov- ernment to enter this field permanent manner. “That the Frost government should contribute liberally to the present appeals of the Ballet and the Toronto Symphony Orchestra and other Ontario institutions, goes without saying. But it is not enough for the government (which has annual surpluses of up to $58 million) to throw a lifeline. to a sinking cultural or- ganization. t “What is required is govern: in a ment aid that will make possible va . lack of financial the further development of a dis- tinetly Canadian expression in the arts—so necessary to combat the overwhelming U.S, influence; so desired’ by our artists, writers and musicians; so thwarted by. sustenance. The surfeiting of our people with the shoddy products of U.S. commer- cialized art makes the plight of * our struggling Canadian cultural institutions all the lenging. , “During the 1952 session of the Ontario legislature, I urged the establishment of a special branch for cultural activities within the department of education, the ap- pointment of a full-time, compe- more chal- tent director for that branch and — the setting aside of a minimum of $250,000 a year for the work of this branch. : “Now that we are in a new session of the legislature, and with the plight of the Ballet and Toronto ‘ fresh in the minds of the people, Symphony Orchestra putation without proving that he has failed to maintain the ethics of his profession or meet his ob- ligations as a citizen.” - The meeting decided to give a letter of recommendation to Mar- shall after hearing his statement on his dismissal by Greater Vic- toria Library Board,. ostensibly without reason but coincidental with a smear campaign in the daily press attacking his alleged left-wing affiliations. — A full report will be made to the Canadian Library Association by Flora McLeod, who represent- ed the association at the meeting. \ + ncial help?’ J. B. SALSBERG, MPP | Develop Canadian expression — it should be possible to create suf- ficiently. strong pressure on the government to bring about ac-. tion along the general lines of my proposal.” ne read : PACIFIC TRIBUNE — MARCH 5, 1954 — PAGE 4