OPERATION DISMANTLE BOX 3887, STATION “Cc”, OTTAWA, CANADA K1Y 4M5 TEL, 613-722-6001 ELEY 2d T. JAMES STARK, PRESIOENT AGNES Nuclear . question legal: 8c. VICTORIA (UPC) ment: question tbe answered -in several B.C. municipalities during civic elections Saturday is legal, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Patricia Proudfoot ruled Wednesday.. "Justice “Proudfoot dismissed a citizen's attempt. to overturn a bylaw that had author. ized a disarmament re- ferendum in Oak Bay, B.C., a municipality adjacent to Victoria. - Brucs Baird tried to blork- the referendum, saying nuclear dis- ‘armament was not an ‘issue a municipality ‘Gouid control, and con- ‘sequently a municipali- ty should not deal with it, Co, ‘ However, Justice Proudfoot said the issue of nucicar wea. pons proliferation affects “not only the thunicipality, but the : entire universe.” Disarmament vote challenge | rejected by top Ontario court The Citizen, Ottawa, Saturday, October 30, 1982 By Denise Harrington » Citizen staff weiter! .Ottawans ‘will get’ to vote for or’ against world disarmament Nov. 8 follawing an. Ontario Supreme Court ‘justice’s refusal Friday to grant an injunction blocking the re- ferendum. : . Mr. Justice Joseph O'Brien rufed there would be.“‘no irreparable. harm or damage caused by permit- ting the city to proceed with the by- law” that allows a referendum: on nuclear disarmament to: be held during the Nov. 8 municipal elec- tion. Retired public servant Boris Ce. lovsky and public servant Merrick. . Spalding applied for the. injunction and asked O'Brien to declare invalid : the bylaw Ottawa council ‘passed in May authorizing the referendum be- cause it was beyond the city’s juris diction. . ' Arguing in court without a lawy- er, Spaiding said holding the dis- armament vote at the same time as city council and school | clece tions could prejudice the outcome of those votes.: : Thousands of taxpayers’ dollars . would be wasted, he added, if’ a.. candidate challenged the results on’ - the basis of the referendum and the elections were declared void. But O'Brien said divisional court in. Toronto would normally deter- mine if a. municipal bylaw is ultra vires. He concluded the matter was’ not urgent cnough to warrant an immediate ruling and referred Jit to . the divisional court, adding it was unlikely to. be heard there before the municipal-vote. . City of Ottawa lawyer Doug ° Wallace argued the city had the ° right to hold the vote under the: so- ‘ called “good government” section of | the Municipal Government Act, which permits municipalities to‘ take 21 “actions for the “health, safety, wel- fare and morality” of théir citizens, “Tt is hard to think of anything else which more ‘direstly affects the health, safety, welfare and ‘morality of the inhabitants (of Ottawa " Wallace said; referring to the dis- armament question; tala Outside the court,. Spalding and Celovsky said they did not oppose disarmament but would not vote in the referendum because they believe it should not be heid.. ar Civic elections have traditionally low turnouts and: the extra two or three per cent of voters. who turn out strictly because of the referen- dum couid tip the scales in council and school board races, Celovsky sai ‘ “I. just ‘hope :no school beard (candidate) loses by five votes or 30. because I can use my statistical stu. dies to help that candidate (chal- lenge the results),” he said, . Worto Disarmament THROUGH A GLOBAL Rererenoum Beebe UE ave takes cae