May 3lst, 1976

Treasury Board approval and the stretching of the remaining portion of
the Programme from five years to ten years duration and he indicated
that while some funds have been approved he would go back to the Treasury

Board in an attempt to gain approvals for more projects at this time.

;Plan.& Zon.Comm. From the Planning & Zoning Committee, May 13th, 1976, advising of

ire Appln.SS#7/76

- pee a IN pe ae Mbit tte

an applicatiou received to subdivide by Strata Plan an existing duplex
at 4012-4014 Cedar Drive, legally described as Lot 76, Block F, SE
Section 7, Township 40, Plan 20920. A memorandum dated May 28th, 1976

from the City Engineer, concerning ‘the application was also submitted

advising that in order to provide an adequate dyke at Cedar Ditch, some

encroachment onto existing properties on the East side of Cedar Drive
will be necessary to meet the reconstructed elevation of Cedar Drive and
recommending that the applicant provide an adequate Right-of-Way to
permit this work to be done in the future.

Moved by Alderman Laking:

Seconded by Alderman Keryluk:

That as recommended in a report from the Planning & Zoning Committee,
May 13th, 1976, Application SS#7/76 to subdivide by Strata Plan an
existing duplex at 4012-4014 Cedar Drive, legally described as Lot 76,
Block F, SE Section 7, Township 40, Plan 20920, be approved; SUBJECT to
the applicant providing an adequate right-of-way on his property to
permit reconstruction of Cedar Drive for dyking purposes to be carried
out in the future as recommended in a memorandum from the City Engineer,

May 28th, 1976. Carried.
Aldermen Ranger and Traboulay voted against the resolution.

Prior to passage of the foregoing resolution, Alderman Ranger
stated he felt the easements on Cedar Drive should be obtained as and
when required and not isolate this one case - which is not the intent of
the strata title legislation. In answer to a query from Acting-~Mayor
Alderman Thompson the City Engineer advised that the easement would be
a written agreement with the applicant and that there would be a charge
against the title. The applicant, Mr. A. Clelland, was in attendance at
the meeting and stated he had no objections to granting an easement over
his property for the proposed reconstruction work on Cedar Drive.
Alderman Traboulay reiterated his opposition to conversion of duplexes
to strata title in the City in view of the need for rental accommodation;

however, Mr. Clelland pointed out that by converting his duplex to