THE WESTERN CANADIAN LUMBER WORKER 2nd Issue July, 1965 hourly earnings in manufact- uring ran about $2.44 an hour employers paid about 60c ad- ditional in fringe benefits, he said. Thus, Secretary Wirtz said an overtime hour costs employers only one and one fifth times the straight time rate. With average fringe costs rising at least 3c an hour each year he says it is no wonder that overtime is on the upswing. ie 4 ( | The majority of the con- tracts under examination im- pose double pay for excessive . overtime or time worked be- yond two shifts. The Electrical Workers provide for double ~ time and one half ia excess of eighteen hours work. ‘AUTOMATION FUND’ The term “automation fund” is used to describe a device which is jointly established by management and labour; to which money is contributed because of changes in equip- ment, methods, or plants which result in greater output per man hour; and from which money is disbursed for the purpose of sharing the gains of such changes with the re- tained employees and/or pro- viding the equities and needs of displaced employees and/or studying the best means of ac- complishing these purposes. A detailed study has been made of six automation funds as fol- lows: (1) The United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund. (2) The Music Performance Trust Fund. (3) The West Coast Long- shore Mechanization and Modernization Fund. (4) The New York Long- shore Container and Bulk Sugar Funds. (5) The Armour Automa- tion Fund. (6) The International La- dies’ Garment Workers Un- ion Supplementary Unem- ployment-Severance Benefits Fund. F The development of these funds indicate a conflict in policy namely, whether such funds should mainly benefit retained employees or displac- ed employees. The investigator lists as major possible goals of labour es th management in negot- iating an automation fund the following: (1) To prevent, slow down, 33 stop, or limit automation. “=o (2) To initiate, speed up, or extend automation. (3) To share the savings of automation with employ- ees. (A) To provide greater job security. (5) To provide greater in- _ (6) To preserve accumulat- rights and_ benefit (8) To gain employee co- operation in the installation and efficient operation of new equipment and processes. (9) To improve industrial relations generally. (10) To improve public relations. The benefits of an automa- tion fund may be designed primarily to aid those employ- ees who will be retained in the company or industry. In this way the fund provides a spec- ial mechanism for the retained employees to share in the sav- ings brought about as a result of automation. The price they pay is cooperation in the in- stallation and efficient opera- RS - 2 eT Ae lpr ieee ert) Lopes = BARGAINING & AUTOMATION tion of the new equipment and processes. Most of the income of the Coal Fund is spent for this type of benefit. The miners who are retained in the in- dustry receive $100:00 per month pension from the fund upon retirement at age 60 or later. In addition, the fund provides hospital and medical care and widow’s and surviv- ors’ benefits for retained em- ployees and their families. All of the payments from the West Coast Longshore Fund and the New York Longshore Bulk Sugar Fund are also of this type. The West Coast fund provides a lump sum payment of $7,920 for Hewers of Wood and drawers of water. wosnua ix.» each retained registered “A” longshoreman with 25 years of service upon retirement at age 65 or later, or $5,000 in death or disability payments. The $7,920 may also be used for voluntary early retire- ment. The fund also guaran- tees retained employees that their weekly income will not be cut below a certain number of hours of pay per week as the result of the mechaniza- tion and modernization pro- gram. Of the six funds examined in the study referred to above, only three provide benefits for those actually displaced by an automation program. The Ar- mour Fund will in the future nourab brought up-to-date by DAYTON THE BIG NAME IN BOOTS .» ARTISTRY IN DAYTONS ¥¢4 LEATHER pay relocation costs, although originally it did not provide any benefits to displaced em- ployees except on a pilot op- eration basis. The parties in their 1961 labour negotiations agreed that relocation costs may henceforth be paid from the fund until it is exhausted. The Ladies’ Garment Work- ers Fund provides benefits for displaced workers in the form of both termination pay and supplementary unemployment compensation benefits. Pay- ments in this industry, how- ever, are limited to employees who lose their jobs because the firm goes out of business, which in most cases is not re- lated to automation. &