C _iban dele te sho UFAWy = ee gates to the recent UN Food and Ag e : xecutive board. They are left to right, Gui John Rutka photo ab riculture Organization’s fishery conference in Vancouver ove as they attended a lunch reception together with Soviet delegates sponsored by the llermo Alvarez, Joaquin Fernandez and Andres Mena. Tenants face rent increases Gs housing squeeze tightens By SEAN GRIFFIN _ Por : In the ies now, the telephone been can Council office has Calls fro Bing constantly with rent ™ tenants complaining themashigh ses —_ Some of Crease of 6 as50 dollars. Anin- common 30 dollars a month is It’s an an old story for the land- lorg. - Crea i and he a housing shortage aa * back and wat meny eceister Swell as an ae nstruction contracts. Portions, 4S reached crisis pro- Inc ; apart oe the vacancy rate for tW0 pes Shas hovered-around ih Sa and the rents— ris- Year. have eae of 7% per “op, € reflected the short Ut dropper the vacancy rate has to 6% — only six apart- y 1000 are vacant— al £0uge is on. nt Tentals, the owners aa longer give a r an on investment, Company ortage. But yet a f bee Such as Dawson Probie arts Ltd. found no ai realizing a profit in- anuary $1 ot € period ending Tee inever the rent a co p Ttme 85% over the same period in 1972. On January 17 of this year, the B.C. Tenant’s organization sent an eight-man delegation headed by president Bruce Yorke to Vic- toria outlining a number of de- mands, notably. the establish- ment of rental review boards in every municipality, and legisla- tion making landlords give “just cause”’ for evictions. Attorney-general Alex Mac- Donald gave a “‘very definite impression”’ at the time that he would introduce legislation in the session beginning January 25 to guarantee those basic rights to tenants. He also expressed surprise that there was no legislation to force landlords to justify evictions. The B.C.T.O. went to Victoria again on Tuesday — to see what happened to the indi- cations given by MacDonald and to the election promises of the NDP. And they went with a new demand: that the provincial government move into housing programs to end the housing shortage deliberately created by the apartment owners. Apartment owners blame shortage on tenant militancy He just can’t afford the rent. | God isn’t dead. and uncertainty about legisla- tion giving tenants bargaining rights with landlords. “This has contributed to a virtual cessa- tion of rental housing accom- modation,”’ said Dick Richards, president of Pacific Apartment Managers Association, mem- bers of which operate some 18,000 rental suites. But the real facts reveal some- thing quite different. Under new federal tax legislation, pro- fessional people who own many of the frame-style apartments in the urban areas, are no longer able to depreciate their apart- ments by considerable amounts each year and then subtract the depreciation from their per- sonal income tax. Inevitably, tomake up the dif- ference, they pass it on wher- ever they can— in this case, the tenant. And since some of these owners are carrying whopping big second mortgages at 18 to 20 percent, the rent increases that they load on the tenants are fre- quently substantial. And big apartment owners can only benefit from a housing shortage. It enables them to rent any accommodation whether it meets certain stand- ards or not — and at whatever rent the market will bear. It gives them a club to hold over the tenants to prevent them from achieving decent rental conditions and rights. The only answer, Say the tenants, is for the provincial government to move into the housing field and respond to the acute shortages created by the apartment owners by building thousands of units of public hous- ing. Public housing can be facil- itated by utilizing sections of the National Housing Act. Money can also be made avail- able to the municipalities and the city for housing projects. mand protection against abusive increases in rent, against unjust evictions and the removal of the rental grievance procedure from the hands of the d courts. In the meantime the tenants de- While Mineral Act changes introduced in the Legislature this week will undoubtedly tighten government controls over operation of the industry, it falls far short of giving the people of this Province the kind of financial return they .are entitled to from B.C.’s Number Two industry. This is the first major overhaul of the Act in 80 years. The amendments, known as Bill 44, will: 1) Require mining companies to obtain cabinet approval before starting production. Approval, in turn, will require proof that (a) the operation is economi- cally viable; (b) it is ecologi- cally reclaimable and meets safety standards; and (c) is the best method of production. 2) Provide some steps in the direction of increased Canadian control. And, 3) Permit the govern- ment to go into parternship with private enterprise. Nothing very revolutionary about that; as reaction of the big mining monopolies confirms. On the primary question of resource policy in mining indus- try (no less than gas and oil, lumber, etc.) the matter of an By NIGEL MORGAN increased return from resource useage (much of it by foreign corporations) is not answered. B.C.’s rich mineral wealth belongs to the citizens of B.C., yet with a total production of $526 millions in 1971, govern- ment revenues from the mining industry (including gas and petroleum) amounted to only $57 million. And out of that the government expended over $7 million in services. And to top it all off, over $400 million worth of B.C. mineral production, as well as the jobs they could have provided went to foreign countries in the form of concentrates or ingots for processing and manufacture. Increasing the Canadian composition of boards of direc- tors of mining corporations operating in B.C. to 50 percent, and the cost of a free miner’s license to $20, while necessary, falls far short of what is required to provide the hundred thou- sand new jobs B.C. needs, and tax relief the people expect and are entitled to. Strong public pressure is required to compel the new government get a better return: from development of the prov- ince’smineral resources. Multi- national mining corporations have been allowed for too long to extract and export irre- placeable resources while paying very little to the people for their exploitation. It is time the government took firm steps to reclaim control over their development and processing. Crown corpora- tions should be formed to promote their exploration and utilization wherever private interests refuse to do so ona basis beneficial to the people of B.C. Meanwhile, highly profit- able mining companies and pro- moters should be compelled to disgorge more of their rich loot taken from this province — pay much heavier royalties and taxes to the government trea- sury. Tenants plan rally Tenants from all over the lower mainland have been called toa rally Sunday at two o'clock to hear a full report on the results of the tenants lobby to Victoria Tuesday, March 6. The rally is sponsored by the B.C. Tenants Organization. Burrard, : NDP MLA for Rosemary Brownand Alderman ROSEMARY BROWN Harry Rankin will address the meeting to be held in the Iron- workers Hall at Eighth and Columbia. The rally is intended to spear- head a campaign for action on the part of both provincial and city governments to stabilize rents which have skyrocketted as a result of a severe housing shortage deliberately created by apartment owners in an attempt to put pressure on governments to halt any tenant legislation. Also to be discussed in the meeting are proposals for a cam- paign to get both levels of govern- ment involved in public housing projects to relieve the strangle- - hold private developers pre- sently hold on housing construc tion. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, MARCH 9, 1973-——PAGE 3