September: 4h, 21973.

oA \ regular meeting of the. vuntetpal Coune 11 of ‘The Corporation. of the Cty of

Port Coquitlam was ‘held in the Counc. chamber, Port, Soquitian city Hall, 2272.
WeAlLdeter Avense, Port Goquitan, B.C. on Sepé ptember, Athy 1973. at 7230 fae
. His Norshts Mayor LB. Scott, . Aldermen: G. R. | taking Ee N. Mabbett, PR. Fe Rangers
.- Thompson, and LM. ‘traboulay. in. attendance. |
Also. dn attendance were. Chief Administrative Of ficer LD, Poltock,
RAY Freeman, Ci! ty Engineer V.G. oreh, P. Engs, Janna Taylor, Recreation Directoe . -
and Fire Chief W.S. Wingrove.

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES:

Moved by Alderman Laking: Minutes --

Aug. 20/73

Seconded by Alderman Thompson:

That the minutes of the regular meeting of this Council held on August 208,
1973, be taken as read and adopted. _ 7 _ oe, ; Carried.

| Prior to passage of the resolution quete od above Alderman Traboulay drew atten-
tion to the omission of the names of the mover and seconder of. the resolution quoted
at the bottom on Page 2 of the minutes and it was agreed that the minutes would be
corrected by inserting the correct names therein. |

UNFINISHED BUSIN. “A:

The City Clerk advised that rezoning Applicaticn Ri 73 submitted by Mr. Frank-Rezon. Appl
, : RHI-73
pel had been deferred for reconsideration when a full compliment of Council mem-
bers were available but as Alderman Meyer was absent, this evening he expected the

Council would again want to defer consideration. Alderman Laking advised that. the

applicant had also reauested a deferment at this time.

Moved by. Alderman Laicing:

Seconded by Alderman Traboulay:

That Rezoning Application Ra9- 73 be deferred untol a further: request for its

reconsideration is received from the applicant. Carried.

From Alderman Pp. F. Ranger, being: two reports dated August C 29th, | 1973, both re-Ald. Ranger

re Bllaw #
ferring to Zoning Amendnent By~law No. 1255, which would have permitted the estab- 1255- Day

lishment of Community Care Facilities in various zones of the city with the first were
report stating Alderman Ranger ' s dissatisfaction with. the Council referring the dy-
jaw back to the Health Committee and Planning & » Zoning Committee without stating

their objections to the By-law or giving any direction to the c Committees. Alderman —
Rang’ ger! 8 second report stated his views in favour of By-law No. 1255 and why it

should ‘be passed. Alderman Rauger verbally recounted the progress of the Zoning
Amendment By-law No. 1255 as recorded in the Council minutes and he also refenrd to.

various documents concerning Day Care that had been received by Council members.

Alderman Traboulay stated that although he supported the concept of Day Care in