Tax Effect of change . Recommended Change (Increase) Reference From To Decrease Culvert & Storm Connection Revenue . (25,000) (28,200) 3,200 Breaks even with expected expenditures. : Engineering Consultants 46,400 30,560 215,900 Pitt River Road (Engineering) 425,000 440,900 (15,900) Provincial Secondary Highways Grant (212,500) (220,450) ‘7,950 Transfer from Road DCCs (212,500) (220,450) 7,950 Above 4 changes take the portion of . Engineering Pitt River Road & add it to the Capital request & bill the Province for & & recover the other } from Roads DCCs. Environmental Protection 6,000 3,500 2,900 Revised estimate. Trans from Tax Sale Reserve (3,800,000) (3,910,000) 110,000 Transfer to Tax Sale Reserve 106,290 128,290 (22,000) Above 2 items take the cost of the radio system from our Tax Sale Reserve & start repayment over a 5 year period. Tables & Chairs (Mabbett Room) 1,000 Tables & Chairs (Hyde Creek) 1,000 Buy lesser amount. Office carpet Hairdryer outlets (Hyde Creek) Engergy Management Equip (Arena) Lighting Routley Park Hot Chocolate Machiné Paint McLean Park Light Poles Cut completely. 3,500 1,000 5,000 5,000 1,000 1,200 Total Reduction in Taxes Recommended $219 ,8C0 These changes if accepted will reduce general property taxes to $9,385,844 which is an increase of approximately 8% (5% after growth) from last year. BUDGET CONCERNS: pending on roads capital (or extraordinary maintenance) is not sufficient over the long run to do the job required, we have about 130 Km of local streets which are worth somewhere around $25,000,000. The amount of money in our 1987 budget for upgrading these roads is $200,000 which if continued over a period of time would mean that we are expecting our side streets to last 125 years. A more reasonable expectation would be a 25 year life (designed for 20 year life) so an annual allocation of $1,000,000 would be required. We are purchasing the Kilmer House but our budget does not include any funds for operating costs or revenues, it ig therefore assumed that one will offset the other. L. The amount of money we are $s ‘ J. Maitland 46