' ; : . t pomenanunen neon 50 YEARS AGO Some of the scores of labor papers — including at top left, the Industrial News, launched a century ago — that are part of British Columbia's tradi- tion of working class journalism. The photo is from 1937. In half a century of publication, the Pacific Tribune has been denounced from the floor of the legislature, sued for libel, censored and finally refused by its printer and supressed by the federal government. From all these assaults on freedom of the press, a cherished freedom about which the daily press was silent when it was banned in 1940, it has emerged triumphant. During this same half century, two Vancouver dailies, the Vancouver News-Herald and the Vancouver Times have folded, ownership of the Vancouver Sun and The Province now gives the Southam interests a daily press monopoly in the city and merger of the Victoria Times and the Victoria Colonist into the Times-Colonist has created another monopoly in the capital. Yet, with meagre financial resources and scant advertising revenue, the Pacific Tribune has survived where the giants have perished. From the struggles for work and wages, against fascism, in the first great depression of the Thirties to the struggles for peace and jobs in the second great depression of the Eighties, its steadfast adherence to the socialist principles of its founding have won it the dedicated support of three generations of readers who have raised millions of dollars to ensure its continued publication. The tradition of a newspaper espousing a cause and fighting for the people’s interests is as old as British Columbia. Amor De Cosmos, who became the second premier after Confederation, started it with the British Colonist he founded in 1858 to oppose the autocratic colonial regime of Governor James Douglas. John McLaren, editor of the Cariboo Sentinel and, like De Cosmos, a leading figure in the Confederation League, continued it as the champion of the Cariboo gold miners. Even before Vancouver was incor- porated as a city in 1886, the tradition was taking new shape among the working people of the province. This 50th anniver- sary year of the Pacific Tribune is also the centenary of the first labor paper, the Indus- trial News, published by the Knights of Labor in Victoria, the first issue of which appeared on Dec. 26, 1885. After the Industrial News, which lasted two years and attained a circulation of around 1,000, many labor and socialist papers came and went. Some, like the Indus- trial World in Rossland, official organ of the Western Federation of Miners, and the Independent, supported by the Vancouver Trades and Labor Council, were predomi- nantly union papers. Others, like the West- ern Clarion, established by a merger of the Clarion in Nanaimo and the Western Social- ist in Vancouver, advocated the policies of the old Socialist Party of Canada. As The Advocate, one of the Pacific Trib- une’s forerunners, was to be during the Second World War, the Western Clarion was banned during the First World War, reappearing as the Red Flag and then the Indicator. By far the most successful and influential of the labor papers, whatever their political coloration, which published for a few months or a few years before the B.C. Workers’ News appeared, were the B.C. Federationist, published jointly by the B.C. Federation of Labor and Vancouver Labor Council, and the Commonwealth, which drew its support from the CCF but was privately owned by Bill Pritchard through his majority share control of the Common- wealth Printing and Publishing Company. Like the Commonwealth and the B.C. Workers’ News two decades later, the B.C. Federationist was born at the onset of one of the economic crises inherent in the capitalist system. Founded as the Western Wage- Earner, the first issue under the new name on Nov. 2, 1912 set the militant tone the 14 e PACIFIC TRIBUNE, MAY 1, 1985 By HAL GRIFFIN paper would maintain until its decline in the postwar years. It championed ‘the cause of the Van- couver Island coal miners, then two months into their historic two-year strike. It called for action to relieve growing unemploy- ment, reporting that half the city’s building trades workers had no work. “Soup kitchens in Vancouver, the last word in poverty, miserty and squalor. A Cordova Street restaurant advertises a free bowl of soup on a cotton sign,” wrote George Bartley, prioneer printer, editor — he was editor of the Independent — and labor historian, in the Apr. 10, 194 issue. “...Workers wanted indeed — with thou- sands now walking the streets lacking food and shelter and thousands more silently starving. . :Everyone knows that business is practically at a standstill and the sooner people outside know it, the better. It’s no use living in a fool’s paradise, pretending that things are ‘going good’ when they are emphatically not...” The B.C. Federationist campaigned vigorously for workmen’s compensation and votes for women, both of which were won after defeat of the corrupt McBride- Bowser government in the 1916 provincial election. And it was threatened by the cen- sor for its strong campaign against con- scription although, unlike the Western Clarion, it was not banned. The Commonwealth, launched in 1933, barely outlasted the B.C. Workers’ News’ first year of publication. At the height of its influence it had a circulation of 21,000, including 1,200 in Saskatchewan, and was selling shares to launch a daily. The issue on which the Commonwealth foundered was control of the paper and the developing split in the CCF, which had elected its first seven members to the legisla- ture in 1933. Pritchard held 10,000 A shares, which carried three to one voting rights over B shares in the Commonwealth Printing and Publishing Company sold to CCF sup- porters. This gave Pritchard a majority con- trol he was loath to relinquish, for he envisaged himself in much the same rela- tionship to the CCF as Odhams Press after it took over the London Daily Herald to the British Labor Party, submitting only editor- ials for scrutiny to the party. The paper’s staff wanted 5,000 of Prit- chard’s 10,000 A shares transferred to the CCF to be vested in the provincial president and under pressure Pritchard made state- ments creating the impression that this had been done. In fact, it never war. Finally, to force the issue, the staff went public over Dr. Lyle Telford’s popular radio program. I wrote the statement that Don Maxwell, killed in Italy during the Second World War, read over Telford’s program. The next morning Pritchard fired both of us and the majority of the staff walked out in our support. It was the beginning of the end for the Commonwealth. The nearly bankrupt paper languished for a few months, but shorn of CCF support it had cut its own roots. The final chapter was written in the 1937 provin- cial election after Rev. Robert Connell, the CCF leader, and three of the MLAs, Jack © Price, R. B. Swailes and Ernest Bakewell, broke with the CCF, formed the Social Constructives and ran 14 candidates, including Pritchard. All were defeated and the CCF returned to the new legislature with the same number of seats it held in the old. With the Commonwealth gone, the CCF launched a new weekly, the Federationist, edited by Barry Mather, But it lacked the earlier crusading vigor of the Commonwealth and its stand on the issues of the day had none of the forthrightness and mil- itancy of the B.C. Workers’ News, which surpassed it in circulation. The B.C. Workers’ News — it became the People’s Advocate on Apr. 2, 1937 and The Advocate on Sept. 1, 1939 — fought on every issue from jobs for the unemployed to support for the Spanish Loyalists fighting Franco’s fascists in Spain. It chronicled the On-To-Ottawa Trek in 1935 and the Post Office Sitdown of 1938 and its headline on the ‘Bloody Sunday’, June 19 — ‘30,000 at dock as boys go’ give the lie to Margaret Ormsby’s claim in her British Columbia: A History that only 2,000 were there. And as Hitler continued his march to the east through Austria, the Sudeten and Czech- oslovakia and the threat of world war drew closer, the paper’s headlines reflected the reality that western governments concealed with declamations about peace — ‘Cham- berlain’s policies leading to war’ and ‘Plans of Munichmen exposed by Molotov’. They have stood the test of history. With the outbreak of war, the paper entered on the most difficult period in its history. The advocates of appeasement, the apologists for fascism suddenly became anti-fascists, although nonetheless vitriolic in their denunciation of the Soviet Union for the pact with Nazi Germany through which it thwarted the grand imperialist design for which Austria and Czechoslova- kia had been sacrificed to embroil the Soviet Union in war with Germany. The Vancouver Sun called the pact “the most outstanding example of double- dealing and chicanery modern times have seen.” The Federationist said, ““We would go further than that...and say’ it is a betrayal of the working class of the world.” Those statements have not stood the disclo- sures of history. When the Soviet Union and Finland went to war after Finland had rejected Soviet proposals for territorial exchange and financial compensation as_ being “inconsistent with Finland’s policy of strict neutrality,’ Angus McInnis, MP for Van- see ‘30s page I5