aie Mt SMITH ITS TIME 10 GO... GO GRACLIULY. Although South Africa came under increasing international pressure, the racist government Rhodesian premier lan Smith faced opposition from its own party backers as white members of the ruling “Rhodesian Front” (RF) demonstrated earlier this month in Salisbury demanding that Smith accept a transition government to Black majority rule. Throne speech hints at further Cont'd from pg. 1 It’s interesting that the person chosen by the Socreds to lead off the debate made resource giveaways his main theme. Esquimalt MLA Lyle Kahl called * for B.C. to do more to share its primary resources with countries that need them. He said the government would legislate “positive steps’? to send out primary resources to world markets, and that the public should support these steps. Announcing that the Socred government would continue to support the federal anti-inflation program, the throne speech is loaded with references to workers accepting “‘restraint in this crucial year.’’ In words pointedly ad- dressed to B.C.’s working people and trade union movement, the speech said ‘“‘my government believes this province must pause and let the rest of the world catch up in terms of cost. If our people can hold down their demands this year and next, my government believes there will be more benefits for all in the years that follow.”’ The speech was equally frank and outspoken on its big business orientation when it said that the government ‘‘intends to provide more opportunity to the private sector this year and in the years ahead.” It’s almost certain, judging from the ,throne speech, that labor legislation will receive major attention at this session. New labor legislation to consolidate all existing labor legislation into one new code is promised. What this means is not spelled out. But in view of the Socred government’s record this past year, it cannot be good news for labor. Although the government has indicated it will not bring down right-to-work legislation, labor ~ minister Allan Williams earlier in the year said the government is considering measures which would interfere in the internal affairs of unions, such as when strike votes are to be taken and scrutinizing of strike votes. Also during the year the B.C. Labor Relations Board, cutbacks set up under the NDP government, assumed a more punitive position toward unions, imposing heavy penalties and _ disciplinary measures against workers, such as it did in Kitimat. The Employers Council of B.C. and other major big business bodies, have submitted briefs to the government urging tougher anti-labor legislation which would restrict picketing even more, and give the courts greater powers to deal with labor disputes. Two issues raised in the throne speech which will arouse con- siderable public opposition are the proposal to ‘‘eventually’ provide financial support for private and independent schools, a measure already protested by the president of the B.C. Teachers Federation as a step which would undermine the public school system; and the plan to build ‘secure facilities” for juvenile delinquents. The latter proposal has been criticized by social workers as moving in the wrong direction to tackle the problem of juvenile delinquency. There is also serious concern about what the government intends | to do with land use controls which were set up under the NDP government. The Socreds have bitterly opposed the freeze on agricultural land and have moved in a number of areas to unfreeze some of this land for real estate promotions. Nor is it clear what the throne speech meant with its promise to extend the respon- sibility of local government in areas of community planning. This could mean an attempt to’sneak in some proposals of the Bawlf Report to put restrictions on what civic governments can do to control real estate promotions through zoning, land freezes, and public facilities. All in all, the throne speech in- dicates that progressive and labor forces in B.C. are faced with the need for greater vigilance to protect their interests, and to mount effective pressure on the present session of the legislature to ensure that right wing programs are defeated, and progressive policies adopted which would benefit the people of B.C. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—JANUARY 21, 1977—Page 12 - Saying John Harper, secretary treasurer of the Kamloops and District Labor Council, has charged the B.C. Government Employees Union with trying to “blackmail’’ the council. The charge arose from an unsuccessful attempt by the BCGEU to block the election of one of its own members, Terri Ash, to the office of president of the council. Ash was a delegate from the labor council to the last November convention of the B.C. Federation of Labor. In accordance with the position of the council she sup- ported Len Guy and George Johnston — and the leadership of the BCGEU responded angrily. On January 10, the day before the council elections, the BCGEU sent a telegram to Harper an- nouncing the withdrawal of its nine components affiliated to the council because the incumbent officers had not disqualified Ash from seeking the presidency. The telegram came two days after Al Lowndes, a BCGEU represen- tative, phoned Harper to inform him that the BCGEU would pull out if Ash, who had been nominated in December, was allowed to run. Interviewed January 10, Lowndes told the Kamloops Sen- tinel, ‘‘because Ms. Ash took a stand contrary to the BCGEU’s moderate position, she cannot be allowed to speak for the union. “As of this date, all of our components are disaffiliated. Terri Ash does not speak for the BCGEU,” he declared. If the term ‘‘moderate” as used here is replaced by another phrase which is the one really meant, it becomes ‘right wing’’ which makes the picture much clearer. Ash is an active member of the NDP — whichis one of the reasons she was nominated. It was felt by some that her election would help to ease the strained relations between the council and the NDP. However, the report given to the council by secretary Harper on January 10 quoted Lowndes as “this executive in Van- couver was very upset that sister Ash was running for president.” Interviewed after her election, Ash said: “Had they looked at it rationally, they would have realized that Ihadno choice. It was not even my intention to an- tagonize the union. The union reacted in a very unfair manner.” She added that the underlying reason was the issue of “in- dependence’’ for the trade union 77 Withdrawal of affiliates undermining labor unity | The withdrawal of the nine BCGEU locals with 1,500 members follows the pullout October 15 of Local 1-417 of the International Woodworkers of America wah 3,000 members. The labor council officers Fes sent a letter to the president of the Canadian Labor Congress asking for a ruling on the constitutionality LABOR COMMENT BY JACK PHILLIPS of the two withdrawals and the election of Terri Ash. This disruption in the labor movement comes at a time when some 300,000 organized workers are scheduled to go into collective bargaining. Among those involved areimportant, trend-setting unions in the retail food chains, con- struction, smelting, the forest mdustry, fishing, freight and cartage and’ municipal and government service. More than half the total are in bargaining ‘un.ts containing 4,000 or more workers. In this critical situation, the B.C. Federation of Labor~should call a conference of the key unions and assist them in working out a ‘coordinated bargaining strategy. The throne speech last week un-_ derlined the necessity of just such an approach when it called for restraint beyond the react guidelines. A coordinated approach in this. province would result in su stantial gains for the workers an could hasten the demise of t wage control program. Those leaders who refuse 1 accept the mandate of the Federation convention are not acting in the best interests of the labor movement. The emerging pattern seems to indicate chal some are working openly to un: dermine the Federation leadership _ —— making it impossible for that leadership to perform its major duties effectively. The October 14 day of protest | against wage controls proved that labor united is a force that cannot be ignored. Those who promote - withdrawals from central labor bodies as a means of showing — opposition to the elected leadership — are, whatever their declared in tentions, rendering a valuable service to the worst enemies of organized labor. | Those who are opposed to this “destabilization” process — ani they are the decisive majority —_ must speak out forcefully. It will not help to try and sweep the issues » under the rug. Instead of division and disruption, there should be unity of action around the vital needs of the membership. For the immediate future, thé issue around which the mem bership of the Federation affiliat { can be united is the 1977 wage and contract meeonahons. Chile CP celebrates 55 years of struggle Amid the political terror and economic despair of fascism, the , underground Communist Party of Chile celebrated its 55th an- niversary on January 3. While inside Chile the occasion was observed quietly in the face of an intense wave of repression that has been unceasing since last September, around the world the CP anniversary was a day for renewed international solidarity. In Havana, Cuba huge crowds turned out for a public solidarity meeting in the auditorium of the Gerardo Abreu factory. Com- munist Party of Chile political movement in relation to the NDP. commission member Rodrigo New forestry hearings ] oo ey Se ili ey exercise in futility’ Victoria has announced that a five-man ‘committee appointed = the provincial government will hold hearings during the next few months in various B.C. centres to receive submissions on what should be done about the recommen dations in the Pearse Royal Commission on forestry. The main drawback with these pencnes is that the committee has laid down the rule that ‘‘all submissions must be directly related to the recommendations of the Royal Commission report . . issues will not be considered.” . any extraneous What the committee thinks “extraneous” is ite most important issue involved in the Pearse report: that it failed to recommend action to end the Tree Farm Licences and other giveaway provisions of the _ present Forestry Act. By limiting submissions only to what is already recommended in the report puts the hearings into a straight Jacket from which very little good will come for the public. The other thing wrong with the plan of the five-man cominittee is that the committee does not include a single representative from labor or the public. Certainly the International Woodworkers of America should be an interested party in what happens in the forest industry. The committee is made up entirely of officials from the government’s | forestry department, plus a consulting forest: economist. Outside of - providing a lucrative job for fi committee members the eau : 1 tt : Rojas was joined on the asso by leaders of the Communist Party of Cuba and by leaders of i! Popular Unity parties. Pare ticularly significant was in presence of Oscar Garreton, general secretary of MAPU an@ Hortensia Bussi Allende, widow 0! President _Salvador Allende, together with Laura Allende, member of the Foreign Secretariat of the Socialist Party. ee Rojas, who himself was released from the junta’s prisons through international pressure, took the occasion to greet the release of Luis Corvalan, whom Rojas ter- med ‘‘representative of the militant history of the Chilean party. The Communist Party of a was born in 1922 at the 4th Congress of the Socialist Worke Party of Chile held at Rancagua. It was at that Congress that a resolution was passed to change the name to the Communist Party and to transform the Workers Party into a Marxist-Leninist — organization. The founder and first leader of the new party was Luis Emilio Recabarren. Recabarren is - also considered the father of the Chilean trade union movement and of the labor press. From 1922 the party went through a number of stages and was declared illegal on a number of occasions. It was the Communist Party that first advanced the conception of Popular Unity and guided that strategy to the popular victory of 1970. There could be little festivities inside Chile as 1977 began. Rather a new round of price increases on food and other necessities greeted the new year. 7