toKNADIAN TRIBUNE, MONDAY@) LABOR-PROGRESSIVE PARTY'S 10-POINT NATIONAL PLAN <<\ 10 BEAT THREAT ="\ OF DEPRESSION JOT a single Canadian need lose his job. Not a single Canadian] farmer need suffer loss of markets. Not a single small busi- ness need close down. cr ER TT ee 2 We CAN prevent another depression. The gry Thirties do not have to come back. The fear bin hen every Canadian family COULD be replaced by confidence. : We CAN create a million new jobs and new opportuni- fies for our young people, and. find new markets for our goods. We CAN have Peace, Prosperity and more Democracy —if, instead of the U.S. interests which are tees acaens our country, we Put CANADA First. It doesn't have to be Trade Minister C. D. Howe ,senior member of the federal cabinet, sees everything rosy for the country next year. But if the United States economy hits the skids as predicted, Canada, dependent on the U.S. for 60 percent of its foreign trade, will be hard hit — unless new policies, such as those outlined in the Labor-Progressive party’s 10-point plan to Beat the Threat of Depression, are adopted. OPEN FORUM Thanks for donations C.A.S., Slocan City,.75¢; J.S., Vancouver, $1.50; M.L., Trail, $2; Victoria press club, $2.07; H.C.G., Victoria, $1.50; J.S., Osoyoos, $1; A.c., Grand Forks, $5; C.H.H., Vancouver Heights, $2; A Friend, Vancouver $2; J.C.J., Vancouver, $10; A.S., Victoria, $5; A.G.B., South Burnaby, $2; E.M.M., Vav- enby, $1.50; Mrs. S., Vancouver, $2; A.N., New Westminster, 40c; R.J.P., Victoria, 40c; A.S., South Burnaby, $2; C.H.C., North Kam- loops, $2; J.I., Okanagan Mission, $2; G.H., Vancouver, $3.50; S.B., Kelowna, $7; C.W., Vancouver, $2; P.P., Ceepeecee, $1; J.J.M., Cloverdale, 40c; S.S., North Van- couver, $1.50; A Friend, Vancou- ver, $5. Injustice to Doukhobors JUSTICE, Vancouver, B.C.: The story about the Doukhobor sen- tenced to 14 years in jail for be- ing in possession of a jug filled with gasoline and oil has aroused my anger. On the basis of the story you printed in last week’s Pacific Tribune, it appears that unless this unfortunate victim is _ granted a retrial, he will die in prison, as he is now 55 years old and in poor health. - The League for Democratic Rights is to be commended for taking up this case. In my opin- icn, people who believe in justice should interest themselves in it -and also in the cases of the other Doukhobors who were given heavy sentences for “nude parad- ing.” Until the mass arrests of Douk- hobors last summer, I knew very little about these people. The “articles in the Pacific Tribune on the Doukhobors gave me some information, and I learned more when I attended a panel discus- sion recently. The discussion was organized by the League for De- - mocratie Rights, and the four speakers were UBC Professors Dixon and Jamieson, lawyer John Stanton and PT reporter Bert Whyte. I was very much impressed by a young Doukhobor who came to the discussion. This gentleman, Cecil Maloff of Thrums, B.C., spoke at the conclusion of the meeting and expressed his hope for a world of “peace and broth- erhood.” With such sentiments I heartily agree. I hope the Pacific Tribune will carry more articles on the Douk- hobors in the near future. Korean POWs READER, Vancouver, B.C.: I have read a great deal in the daily papers about North Korean and Chinese prisoners “refusing to go back home” but nary a word about the South Koreans who won’t return to live under Syng- man Rhee. This week I picked up Time magazine, which has a policy of distorting the news rather than suppressing it, and read of 130 South Korean prisoners who marched into the explanation tents at Panmunjom, listened to the ROK explainers, then refused point blank to leave North Korea. Time, of course, couldn’t re- port the story straight. Speaking of the prisoners’ uniforms “faded by constant washing” it added the slanted barb that “their minds too, had been effectively launder- ed.” . But Time couldn’t overcome the facts. It had to report that ROK explainers handed the POWs written statements ‘from South Korean Defense Minister Sohn Won Il that promised: “You will get all your back pay. You. will be promoted in the army. You will be cited for meritorious achievement. You will be given iority to take a government job. Despite these promises, the 126 men and four girls turned thumbs down on the opportunity to go “home” to South Korea. By JOSEPH NORTH Tobacco companies get alarme by cigaretfe-cancer controversy AM- one of the millions of cigarette smokers. And lately I have become conscious of the fact that I may be buying myself a case of lung cancer. When the American College of Surgeons met in Chicago last month they. had a round table discussion about the relationship. between cigarette smoking and cancer that set me to thinking— and the tobacco companies. to re- vising their advertising budgets upwards. It was Prof. I. S. Radvin, a pro- fessor of surgery at the Uni- versity of Pennsylvania, who got up to say that responsible sci- entific researches during the last five years have revealed “an in- creasing amount of evidence that there is a certain factor in cigar- ette smoking” inducing lung can- cer. That was when I began to get serious about it all. “There are -many specialists who believe that cancer of the lungs is.the leading cancer prob-- lem,” Prof. Radvin said. And he speaks with some authority be- cause he and other indisputably competent scientists, including two past presidents of the Col- lege_of Surgeons, have conduct- ed research projects which show- ed “strong statistical evidence of a relationship between cigarette smoking and lung cancer.” Dr. Radvin made a proposition. He suggested that the tobacco in- dustry has a special responsibility —“a moral obligation” to pay for the research necessary to prove or disprove the suspected rela- tionship between smoking cigar- ettes and lung cancer. “The to- bacco companies ought to put up the money to settle this prob- lem,” he said. It sounds reasonable and I be- lieve they should put up the money—it’s our money, after all. But I’m dubious that we'll get truthful results from an outfit paying to investigate itself. To return to the evidence al- ready accumulated on the bane- ful effects of cigarette smoking: there is a Dr. Alton Ochsner of ‘the Tulane University School of Medicine who heads a clinic by his name in New Orleans. He tells us that cancer of the lung is increasing more rapidly in men than in cases of any other kind of cancer of the body. He tells us that the decade from 1938 to 1948 saw a rise of 144 percent of such deaths. Other types of cancer rose too, but only by 31-percent. Cancer is a disease of the elderly and as the average of life expectancy has risen, cancer, he says, has be- come more prevalent. Then he asks some more pert- inent questions that demand your consideration. He wonders why cancer of the lung, back in 1920, constituted , only 1.1 percent of all cancer cases, And why, by 1970, it will be one in five. “The tremend- ous and disproportionate increase in the incidence of lung cancer demands an explanation,” he says. And he-approaches the answer, it seems to me, when he empha- sizes the incidence of lung can- cer to the phenomenal growth of cigarette sales. “Cancer of the lung,” he says, “gs rare in individuals who do ‘not smoke.” The heavier the smoker the more chance there is that he will succumb to that deadly .can- cer. And he cites enough figures to convince me, at least. Our abstemious elders called cigarettes coffin-nails and science seems to be catching up with our grandfathers. To be honest I cannot say that I have conquered the cigarette habit. I am still in the clutches of Lady Nicotine, but I can re- port that I am much less her slave than I was three months ago. I have cut down to a pack a day: progress registered. I have also taken to a pipe (the scientists say the pipe and the cigar are out of all this). Though my pipe seems to weigh a ton and involves an endless amount of personal house-clean- ing, digging away at the briar with little prongs and forks and miniature shovels, I’m told I will live longer that way. * 6 But then there are the findings of Dr. Clarence W. Lieb, an auth- ority who spent ten years as a re- search adviser to a major tobacco company. He _ supervised the Stefansson nutritional studies at Bellevue Hospital, and these facts are from a study he wrote caller Safer Smoking. Dr. Lieb differs with those who _feel that pipe smoking exempts . study made of more By WALTER HOLMES IF THOSE Americans who have seen red in Robin Hood knew what is said about him in the Soviet Union they might have even more lurid imagina- tions. © I say “if” because it is doubt- ful if these American “educat- ors” and tub-thumpers know anything beyond their own rather frenzied fantasies. lt is a fact that school-chil- dren in the Soviet Union learn about Robin Hood from a book called A Reader in Medieval History, published in 1951. The part about Robin Hood contains the story of the poor knight, Sir Richard of the Lea, who was helped by Robin fo re- cover his land from the rich Robin Hood in Soviet Union ° and greedy Abbot of St. Mary’s. It also tells how Sir Richard helped Robin Hood against his enemy, the Sheriff of Notting- ham. The Russian translator, . T. Podolskaya, faithfully ren- ders the medieval speech with all the invocations of saints and “Our Lady” complete. The book further explains to the Soviet scholars how the legend of Robin Hood develop- ed and expresssed the protest of feudal society against the tyranny of the rich clergy and great nobles. So in this respect, as in many others, those who learn in So- viet schools get a freer view of humanity than do those in the “land of the free.” them from this hoard of evils. Because it has what he greater fire area, it is hotter and more irritating. (Heat is an © ritant, and the more smoke more temperature in the mou the throat, the lungs, and greater the irritation. The hot ter the tobacco, the more tar # other poisons). a But if you.smoke only half t bowlful you are better off a men who smoke cigarettes ¢ cigars, for the last half, like cigarette butt, contains most the nicotine and tar. If you are addicted to cigat you will be wise if you them away half-smoked. It may cost more per annum, but © wear and tear on your life is less. Tobacco, Dr, Lieb says; is poison, and he minces n0 wd about that, but it can relax weary body and the op x mind. Doubtless that is way many people smoke so many © lions of cigarettes. : He has no argument, pears, against moderate sm” But go to excess, he hastet warn you, and you are subject 4 many grave physical ills, 50 that may even shorten your He tells of a study of 7,000 ar sons by the late Dr. " Pearl of John Hopkins of showed that up to the age ets the death rate of heavy i : was more than double that © non-smokers. Then he moves onto 8t0l., that you have overlooked pelo and ‘which may provoke ye stop and think as moment, fies haps with some alarm. si¢: he says, made by cancer, * ach and heart specialists *7. dicate the pernicious effec® the habitual use of tobacc? But the new grounds are many doctors now agree, Be ™ that decreased sexual activity men in their thirties and may often be traced to &' smoking. One reason he gives is ; e a tobacco causes toxic chi the blood which impede ? mation of sexual hormones: — Nor, he declares, are we exempt. He cites @ oe women that shows there © a greater incidence of sterility, menstrual and miscarriages amons than.among non-smokers: — The doctor has many words of advice: I cannot said before, vouch for don’t know. I am not @ He unfortunately. I am ° slave of Lady Nicotine, hell-bent for freedom. — However, the tobacc? ies are not prepared to * or any of the rest of yo" to win our emancipatio? a fight. - The clamor has into their profits, 4 less an authority th ~ Street Journal, and have slumped on the " ket. So the budget °? advertising has beet ¥~ you will find more #45 papers extolling the » butt than you ever Sa¥ pegun PACIFIC TRIBUNE — DECEMBER 18, 1959 —