See

ai 5

ie ee ‘ shin ial f Ne . ater
‘ ONT Sep nee Mi egte earns Se AYR OTLEY iar ERASE AN ; Bae sun pane
y, " 5. ' 7 erat s af ip sar bay ne tak 5 SVR GRAPZT NT ice t iy

ee ah / / ae “s 3 : ‘ ; f

MONAT, 3 Nip tr ws , , aw : ; ROU HAAN BLO an . etek He : ag

; ‘ ¢ 7 f PTE Sey ie i a DONOVAN : Lahn’ fai ARRON i RE y jt ~; he fe 4 aes
Acrsniticiat lithiketabtsy save if pheahat phon
ot a t : Tava 1! Baeg dag Vol aie , bata ben
a. 3 wey i

Pe yb
ifr

oat

Both Committees supported the concept of emergency planning coordination for the Northeast
Sector Communities. However, concerns were raised regarding the following:

(a) The start-up budget for the program is too costly for the first two years

| | (b) The proposed implementation schedule is too compressed. Phasing in the
re various aspects of the program over a longer period of time may be a better
alternative.

(c) Inallocating resources, priority should be given to the development and
maintenance of individual community emergency plans.

Both Commnittees agreed that the final budget for the Northeast Sector Emergency Program
should not be approved independent of the Annual Budget Approval process.

The recommendations have been developed based on the forgoing.

Cy Wee,

| ‘Tony M. Chong,P. Eng. >”
City Administrator

_ ‘attachment.

“TMC/gr

1156-34

vs , !