aCe
Weee ahrd

be ‘ hs i wy

i
ay

aint

‘ Pie

a : ny
ACN Perens A ar AY bebe es
a apt, "BN } fnk de ated i o

EECA TAAL RAPE Rete aetveneitee eerig Sto ket

Reasong to Supports
The following reasons were given in support of this development:

1. This area was zoned for commercial and intended for a commercial
centre as proposed.

Feople from Citadel Heights do not frequently shop in Port
Coquitlam. They go to Pitt Meadows or Coquitiam Centre.

This development will provide for a place to interact with each
other/neighbours.

i
pia
4

A place to get to know our kids.

Purchase of ome was based on having this « iwwcdal site av lable
at one poin .r. the future.

Commercial atre will give a core to the community.

Similar centre in Lower Mainland (Walnut Grove) very successful.

Responses to Opposing Reasons: -

The developer directly or through hig consultants, or by reading
correspondence from the R.C.M.P. responded to the negatives aa follows:

1. Location of school next to a convenient cantre is common in most
areas. Few have problems. It is a management/behavioral issue that
can be controlled. (Developer)

Traffic increase will be very limited. Thia centre will not attract
a large population from other areas. (R.C.M.P.).

Pollution:

Vigual: Centre is very attractive (most everyone agrees) |
Garbage/Noise: Management can control it (R.C.M.P)
Lighting/Signage: Control by Planning Office (R.C.M.?.)

Vandaliem and Youth Gathering:

Young people will gather if there are attractora such ag phones or
video gamea. Management can play a significant role. It is not the
police responsibility alone but the children's parents being aware of

where their children are (R.C.M.P.).

Cri. inerease is not expected. There is no reason or rationale for
incr .ase crime, since this is a local centre used by local citizens

(R.C.M.P.).

Cont'd... /5