ALG dob si MCALLISTER AVENUE COQUITLAM. BC. Tevepnone, 942 . 7221 OUR rite MEMORANDUM September 25th, 1972, TO: L.D. Pollock, City. Adainistrator memorandum is pursuant to the reselution of Council dated May 15th, Engineering Department be directed to undertake a feasibility study" respect to refurbishing the Agricultural Hall, particularly in vegard to tha siaoility of the foundation of the building", the Coief Building Taspector and the undersigned have investigated the subject building and as a result of joint discussion submit the following for Council'g consideration. These i6 noaccess to the crawl space. The foundations and floors have been sudjected to severe dizzerential settlement probably due to both inadequate euncations and dry rot. The floor systems require complete rebuilding to meet the etesent Code, 2. The heating system is completely obsolete and unsatisfactory, A new heatiag systes would ba required to meer the present. Code, 3. The pluxbing systen is obsolete, malfunctioning and unsanitary. A new plunbiag system would be required to meet the present Code. 4. The electrical system is obsolete and unsafe. A new electrical system would be required to meet the present Code, 5. Access to the top floar is inadequate and unsafe. Proper access should be included as part of a renovation and this would probably necessitate structural changes, 6. The general outside and inside condition of the building has deteriorated nm unsatisfactory and unsafe degree. The portion of the building that would vequire replacing or upgrading in order to meet current standards or Codes is difficult to Geteraine until an actual proposed renovation is undertaken, CONCLUSTONS 1. TE this buil ing Was owned by a private company, the City would probably Tagquire that it be desolished forthwith. Even if the. City did not require denolition, they 2G require, upon application for ¥enovation, that the building be upgraded to present ncazds and Codes. . continued page 2. : en, Toe Teena sete ee eee ee sete ee eet, Pewee, maaN be ele wily Ud vue SoQul LAM 70: L. D, Pollock, City Administrator CONCLUSTIONS (con't) 2, The building is used to a considerable degree. It appears that it will have to continue to be used until suitabla proper space can be provided. 3. The cost of a renovation meeting the Code would cost as much or more thaa Providing equivalent space elsewhere. It would be difficult to estinate the actual cost until the renovation had commenced. RECOMMENDATIONS : : 1, This report should be submitted to Council in Committee, Any subsequent reports required from the Fire Marshail's Office or the Medical Realth Officer should be made to the Council in Committee. Because it would appear that the building will have to continue to be used, the making public of unfavourable veports until a satie~ factory decision can be made is not recomended. . 2, The undersigned recomend that tha building be demolished at the earliest possible date. . Renovation does not appear to be practical or economical, lA Sty eZ ba ZZ wt N. Chernoff, Chief Buildiag InSpector, V.G. Borch, P.Eng., City Eagineer. VGB/kc£ ’ WON va lat