| How will automation affect housewives? By EILEEN ROBINS I took part recently in a panel discussion which hadasits theme: *Should Married Women Work?” -I began my remarks at that dis- cussion by saying that I thought we were out-of-date. Itisnot now a question of whether or not mar- ried women should work: itis a question of how best to deal with a situation in which married ‘women have decided that they will, despite all circumstances, work, Society, I think, is finally ac- _Cepting the concept of equality of women, married or single. It is ironic that at the very time when women have achieved the right of equality of opportunity, we face only an equality of prob- lems, é For, let us make no mistake about it, the age of automation brings with it problems for all the workers of Canada, men and women, married and single, It brings problems, too, for the non- workers, who will one day want to work from choice or necess- ity, Among these two groups, the | Workers and the non-workers _.Who would like to work, are found most of the married women in Canada today. : The indirect effects of automa- _ tion have already been felt by = Some of us: husbands, brothers, | Sons, fathers, have lost, or know they will soon lose jobs to auto- Mated machinery, Thus, for some of us, the age of automation has already begun, and the problems are with us now, For others of us, it is our own | obs which are in jeopardy, and } Many more of us’ will soon join | this group, For the work which Women are best suited to do, is precisely in those occupations Which most easily lend them- Selves to automation, Sixty-four per cent of Canadian _ Working women are employed in Clerical, service or manufac- turing work — areas where tech- Nological advances have already Made possible filing without help of human hands, motels where, One can register with the sole aid of aclosed-circuit T.V. _ Screen, and long lines of man- Ufacturing machines which need Neither male nor female to keep them operating. The future can only bring more Of the same, So we shall face a Parodoxical situation: automa- tion in the home will continue, at an ever-increasing pace, to free women for jobs outside the home; at the same time, auto- Mation and cybernetics will SPeedily diminish the number Of jobs available to women, I wonder if automation will NDP Provincial Leader Rob- €rt Strachan told a meeting of Party’s provincial council last _ Weekend that “the party must _ State its policy bluntly, that a €w Democratic government _ Would take over the telephone System,” The B,C, Telephone Co, also Came under sharp fire at a meet- Ng last week of the Kamloops City council, The mayor and coun- 1 were not enthusiastic over a succeed in reversing the trend of recent times and put us women where some people still think we belong — in’our kitchens? It doesn’t seem likely, because in the home of the future, there will be less and less kitchen and general housework to be done, For one thing, the home may be located underground, because there it will be less subject to temperature changes, and may be kept more free from dust and dirt. “Super” airconditioning sys- tems will eliminate most natural dust and dirt, but there will also be a machine emitting waves which will disperse dirt, Our future kitchens (or those of our children) will almost cer- tainly have infra-red ray ovens, which will cook prepared meals in a matter of seconds, Moreover, the meals will probably be sel- ected, to suit the tastes and die- - tary needs of the family, by a home computer. The computer will also tell us when supplies of frozen and _irradiated food are low. Shall we then have to rush off to the supermarket? No —all we’llhave to do is to press buttons indicat- ing what food we want rushed in by special delivery: magnetic conveyor, jet transport, autocar or helicopter. . A T.V. circuit will link all rooms of the house, so that Baby and Junior may be kept under constant surveilance, Dishwashing will be a thing of the past, and clothes will be made of synthetic materials which really will needno ironing. The housewives of the future are obviously going to enjoy, in the words of Doris Anderson, Editor of “Chatelaine”, the true age of emancipation from house- hold drudgery. But will they be truly emanci- pated? Or will automation, push- ing our civilization forward to ever greater heights of progress,,. thrust women backwards into their traditional role as “the second sex”? I think not, In an age where leisure will be for everyone, we shall no longer be so concerned about going “out” to work, We shall see our equality with men as self-evident, but like them, we shall need to learn howto live without work, For in our new society, *non- workers” will be the great maj- ority. And nobody, but nobody, will play a more significant role than the homemaker, For more than ever before, home will be the centre of man’s expanding univ- erse, —From Can. Packinghouse Worker, Nov., 1964. Phone takeover urged proposed rate increase, The company’s service was criticized by Alderman Malcolm Grant, Given the takeover of the phone monopoly as an example of the kind of policies the NDP should pursue, Strachan told the pro- vincial council the party must develop hard-hitting policies and state them bluntly, “In recent years the party has tended to be too soft spoken inits comments,” he said, We are pleased to announce a VICTORY 1546 SUBS IN City —552 subs; Prov.—538 subs; Grand Total — COMPLETE BOX SCORE: 263 P/S Total—815 193 P/S Total—731 1546 subs in on 1500 Total New Subs = 150 A message to our readers: Dear Friends: Thank you one and all for a job well done. To the many devoted press builders and supporters who contributed hours o their time, who drove countless miles and used countless gallons of gasoline in collect- ing old and new readers for our paper, we say simply—Thank You. Your sincere dedi- cation, your gratifying efforts prove once again—fo friend and foe alike—that the progressive labor press is truly deeply root- ed among the people of B.C. Together, we have won a great baftle. It comes upon the heels of a previous vic- tory last spring, when our efforts were successful in raising the impressive sum of $18,000 with which to keep our presses running. But even though the battle is behind us the war rages on, because to keep operat- ing the working class press in these days of rising costs is a never ending process. In December, in January and in every month of the new year, subscriptions will be com- ing up for renewal. If we are not to rapidly lose the benefits achieved during our Cir- culation Drive, these subs MUST be renewed —on time. We are now enfering into the 30th year of continuous publication of the progressive labor press in B.C. No other weekly labor paper in the entire province can make that proud statement. Soon, on the pages of the PT, you will begin reading about some of the plans being considered and prepara- ‘tions underway to mark this historic occa- sion in a suitable manner. But, in the meantime, the best 30th birth- day present all of us can give to our paper is to roll up an ever expanding circulation. With your help, we know this will be done.: Once again, thanks. Provincial Press Committee and PT Staff Final Drive Results GREATER VANCOUVER I VANCOUVER ISLAND : Quotas - Achiev. Quotas Achi CLUB 7 Club iey. Subs P/S | Subs P/S|| Subs P/S | Subs P/S Bill Bennett 50 25 45 5 {| Cowichan 30 10 31 7 Broadway 60 15 62 =17 || Nanaimo 55 40 son 4 Frank Rogers 20 5 12 2 || Victoria 30 20:32 42.18 Georgia ~ 8 3 5 - Totals 180 101-2182 117 Kingsway 45 20 68 ) Niilo Makela 10 Zz 6 1 Point Grey 25 5 | 24 21] Haney-Map.-Rg. 15 o4-16 "3 Vanc. East 130 40 95 58 Siicsion 10 2 9 = South Vanc. 45 20 a25.19 Totals 25 221: 25 3 Victory Square 35 10 44 13 North Burnaby 40 © 10 40 13 Edmonds eee te OKANAGAN North Shore 50 20 68 23 Kamloops 15 = 12 City Misc. 10__100_{ 12 105 |! Notch Hill 15 21 45: 48 Totals 583 295 {552 263 || Vernon 20 7 is. oe PROVINCIAL GENERAL Totals 50 9 42 16 Fernie-Michel 10 2 5 _ Powell River 25 _ 28 _ DELTA Sointula 15 _ 12 — Steveston 5 - 1 - i set ‘ z : 1¢ cae Trail-Rossland 45 JO Alaa HGR ay ty, wi cer on: -Correspon. 25 5 21 5 4 : = eaoweMict: 30 5 36 7 ee Surrey = aA 22 2 Totals po see ee Totals 155 MAY Cae t VANCOUVER ISLAND ; Alberni = 330 25. | 31° 29 Prov. Totals 565 194} 538 193 Campbell River 10 Sa ae ee City Totals 583 295| 552 263 Cumberland = 15 STE fa see Gr'd Totals1148 48911090 456 December 11, 1964—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 11