UNDAY work, imposed by » business and practically without hind- rance in the rest of Canada, is still being firmly opposed by Quebec’s national trade unions. Recently the pulp and paper workers’ unions affiliated to the Confederation of National Trade Unions reiterated their opposi- tion to Sunday work in that in- dustry in Quebec. There are ap- proximately 20,000 workers in pulp and paper industries in Quebec. In a joint brief, the CNTU and the National Federation of Pulp and Paper Workers stressed that the companies asking for amendments to the Sunday ob- servance act had not produced satisfactory proof of the “ne- cessity” for such changes. Testifying before a royal com- mission set up by the Quebec government, the union spokes- men insisted it was up to the companies to substantiate the need of such amendments. “After careful study of the companies’ briefs,” said the CNTU, “we came to the conclu- sion that they have not succeed- ed in establishing the economic necessity for Sunday work.” The CNTU thus maintains its previous position on the sub- ject, opposes the companies’ re- quests and demands that ap- propriate steps be taken to stop all Sunday work which is not absolutely necessary. Unions affiliated to the CNTU are almost the only ones to op- pose continuous production in the pulp and paper industry. The CNTU notes that American unions, expressing a widespread feeling among their Quebec members, have sided with the A return of USS. monopoly - SUNDAY WORK? One of the byproducts of Quebec’s current indus- trial revolution is the ““seven-day-week” crisis. ‘The industrial: upsurge has attracted new plants; companies to request a change in the present legislation. In its brief to the provincial royal commission the CNTU agrees that Sunday work can- not be completely prohibited. The companies insist that continuous production has be- come an “economic necessity” in their case if they want to be in a position to meet the com- petition from other countries, and even. other provinces in Canada. But the CNTU disagrees. It examines the following argu- control ? Needed: N a memorandum to the Can- adian Labor Congress mari- time trustee C. H. Millard proposes to replace the govern- ment trusteeship over the mari- time unions with a union trus- teeship predominantly Canadian and primarily responsible to the CEC. It is reported that the CLC executive is to consider this proposal early in March. Seamen and trade unionists should give Millard’s proposal a long, hard look — and then turn it down! His proposition moves toward a return to U.S. officer control of international seamen’s unions in Canada and toward reversing the small gains made by sea- men in strengthening Canadian trade union autonomy since the trusteeship was established. Basically, what is involved in the dispute around the maritime unions is the right of Canadian workers to build a democratic a hard look at Millard’s proposals Quebec unions in the CNTU are definitely opposed to it but these firms, many of them monopoly giants, would like to scuttle the traditional Quebec ban on Sunday work. At the moment, the fight has the Confederation of Nation- al Trade Unions lined up against giants such as Dominion Tar and Chemi- cal, Paper Corp. While most of the rest of the prov- ince has knuckled under to the demands of the pulp-and-paper monopo- lies (Domtar has already been promised the seven- and Consolidated day week by Lesage), the CNTU is continuing its battle for a ban on Sun- day work. ments: > @ The companies claim their productivity would be increased by one-sixth with Sunday work. The CNTU does not share this optimism. It stresses that the universal law of decreasing out- put also applies to the pulp and paper industry. Continuous pro- duction would increase the out- put—but in a proportion small- er than one-sixth. ® Increased productivity would result, for the workers, in great- er risks of intermittent unem- ployment. LABOR SCENE By ALF DEWHURST union free from outside control, be that control by the com- panies or by U.S. officers of an international union. - At issue also are the rights of Canadian shipping. In 1963 around the conflict between the Canadian Maritime Union and the Seafarers Inter- national Union, the CLC leader- ship was impelled to take up cudgels for Canadian trade union autonomy. The _ issue could then be described by the following question — was the CLC a fully autonomous body with sovereign rights or was it controlled by international union headquarters in the USA? Millard’s proposal on_ the trusteeship brings these issues sharply to. the fore again. So far the trusteeship has failed to grapple decisively with these issues. Achievements in strengthening the process in the maritimes unions setup are mainly the result of united rank-and-file activity in wage and contract struggles. To democratic © Indeed, it is to be presumed that enterprises will be inter- ested in producing at full cap- acity only during peak periods, then working on a_ reduced scale when the demand is get- ting lower. Thus, in addition to losing the privilege of a common rest- ing day, the workers will have to face the difficulties and in- conveniences arising from such practice. © The companies argue that the average production cost would be reduced with Sunday some extent the existence of the trusteeship probably assisted in the development of these strug- gles. In view of this there is no reason why Canadian unionists should add their voices to those of SIU President Paul Hall and the AFL-CIO maritime depart- ment, who want to end the gov- ernment trusteeship in order to re-establish their old positions of control in Canada. The possibility still exists in the present situation to build a firm Canadian union of seamen. Success could open the door to strengthening the autonomy and unity of the entire trade union -movement in Canada, As a step toward this end Canadian seamen could create a federation of maritime unions. This would take into account the existence of the SIU in Canada and the seamen who are members of it, and could lead in the direction of one union of the strengthening of the SoM) -in favor of labor. The )? work, The CNTU points out i as inasmuch as the demaél does not exceed the plant’s PY ductivity on a six-day basis~ as is now the case — Sunil) work would bring no reductid in fixed expenditures. As @ fluctuating expenditures, the” dustry would have to expect! sensible increase, as is the @ in British Columbia, where Ul and a half has to be paid # Sunday work. © Regarding external comp” tition, it is not sure, accorill to the CNTU, that Sunday wo! would significantly improve © competing position of the QM bec industry. This is a measly of limited scope only, whi) once it has been applied, is ™ bound to bring further devel ments. Before a decision is reach! Quebec must be aware of ™ other factors on which actly could be taken, and considé, whether the advantages resill) ing from continuous producti) could not be obtained oll# wise. Finally, the CNTU bri blames the enterprise manab ment for avoiding certain *| pects of the question which# of primary importance to workers. For instance, the work? would like to know what wou! be the consequences of contisl ous production on their act income, present or future, Y well as on their working cond! tions and employment secutll) dh The companies state in ad tion that continuous product! will result in a marked ex sion of the industry, but tht! do not refer to any precise 0V all expansion program. Finally, the spokesmen of pulp and paper industry 45°) that a number of problel) would arise from continu production, such as the diffie conditions in which rep, would have to be made, ©.) have suggested no_ pre measures against this. cases ‘sey Canadian seamen at a MY stage. t At the same time, as part eignty of the Canadian ta union movement, the | fin? should establish a mat! igh trades department, By inclUS of all maritime unions sU department would be able t@ ordinate activity, develop grams and generally strengt! the unity of action of unions. = SS a These proposals are not nth but they deserve to be re at this time. 3 With the appointment of ch Director of Organization J: Kenzie, representation of board of trustees has ch@ must now correct its courte must overcome wrong ‘0 i cies and help to create a f", able climate for . demoey unionism among Canadian men. March 5, 1965—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page ° 7