October 27th, 1975

~ monitor the amount and use of chlorine coming into the City

- permit education of pool owners as to the hazards of use of

chlorine (i.e. necessity of neutralizing chlorine before disposal)

Carried.
Alderman Keryluk voted against the resolution.

In speaking to his motion, Alderman Ranger noted the number of
recent 'fish kills' that have been attributed to chlorine getting into
the streams and indicated that although ‘in ground' pools are regulated
under the Building and Plumbing By-law, the numerous ‘above ground’
pools are not and therefore it is not possible to guarantee their proper
connection to sanitary sewers, etc. Alderman Laking expressed concern
over the regulations governing the fencing regulations for pools and it

was agreed to deal with this problem at a later date.

Prior to discussion of the next item on the Agenda, Alderman Thompson Ald.Thompson
leaves Chamber

requested and received permission to leave the Chamber in view of the
subject matter and he thereupon left the Chamber at 8:20 p.m.

From the City Administrator, October 24th, 1975 with reference to City Admin. re

Insurance

Insurance Brokerage Services wherein it was noted that Hugh & McKinnon Brokerage Serv.
Ltd. had advised that the nerger is now complete and requesting confirmation
of their appointment as the City's Insurance Brokers. The City Administrator,
in his report, outlined the background on this matter with respect to
the use of a Broker and or the alternative of calling tenders for our
insurance coverage. Additionally, the question of a possible conflict
of interest with respect to Alderman Thompson's association with the
firm of Hugh & McKinnon Ltd. was presented to Council as requested in
the letter received from Hugh & McKinnon and the City Administrator
noted that there was no evidence of a legal conflict of interest respezcing
Alderman Thompson and recommended that the firm of Hugh & McKinnon be
appointed as the Broker of Record for purposes of the City’s Insurance
Coverage. Alderman Laking advised that he had spoken with a large
insurance brokerage in Vancouver and they had indicated that for a
premium of approximately 1/3 more than we are now paying, a full coverage
policy could be obtained that would cover a large number of tne claims
for such items as sewer back-ups, damages caused by potholes, etc. that
are presently being refused and he felt that if the City called for bids

on insurance coverage, it m ' possible to obtain far better coverage

at a very small increase in costs. In this respect, the City Administrator