HIGH LEVEL NOISE DEAFENING ? B.C. WORKERS By VIRGINIA TUPPER, M.Sc. j Manager, Noise Control Section Prevention Services, WCB One in every six B.C. workers is exposed to noise levels sufficiently high to cause permanent hearing dam- age. That was the conclusion following a six-month investigation into B.C. noise control priorities conducted by the WCB Prevention Services Engineering Section in 1979. The hearing loss claims picture is equally striking: approximately 1,300 new claims are established each year at a cost of about $3,000,000 to industry. High level noise is primarily of concern because it produces permanent hearing damage. This damage occurs slowly and may go unnoticed at first but the loss is irreversible. The social consequences of occupational deafness are readily apparent. Prevention is the only solution. To date, the majority of employers have relied on hearing protection devices rather than engineering controls to reduce noise exposure. Workers may feel that wearing hearing protection eliminates all possibility of hearing loss, when in fact it may not. In order to be effective, the protector must be of the appropriate class for the noise environ- ment, it must create an effective seal against WCB NOISE CONTROL SECTION — Back Row: Stuart Eaton, Acoustical Engineer; Dan Lyzun, Acoustical Engineer; Peter Smieciuch, Noise Control Officer; Ken Sterling, Noise Control Officer. Middle Row: Pat Austin, Secretary; Arlene Higgs, Noise Control Officer; Steve Brown, Noise Control Officer; John Stevenson, Noise Control! Officer; Virginia Tupper, Manager. Front Row: (Kneeling) John Pendry, Noise Control Officer; Tom Lauritzen, Noise Control Officer. noise and it must be worn for the total exposure time. In addition, adequate hygiene must be maintained to prevent ear infections. The wearing of hearing protec- tion is intended to protect workers in situa- tions where optimum engineering controls have not yet been applied. Those concerns have led the Board to establish a new Noise Control Section within the Prevention Services Division. Its primary objective is to promote the control of noise by engineering means. The section will consist of seven noise control officers and two acoustical engi- neers managed by WCB audiologist Virgi- nia Tupper. The goal of noise control will be approached in two ways: the first will be through greater emphasis on enforcement of noise control regulations. The second will be with educational presentations on noise control in specific industries and the estab- lishment of a technical resource file of successful noise control applications. The revised WCB Industrial Health and Safety Regulations (effective October 1, 1979) require employers to institute engi- neering controls wherever workers are exposed to noise levels in excess of 90 dBA for an eight-hour day. Section 13.21(8) lists permissible exposure time at each noise level and provides a formula for calculating the daily noise “dose” for workers exposed to varying levels throughout their shift. Until engineering controls are achieved, Section 13.21(2) requires that all persons exposed to excessive noise levels shall be provided with and shall wear adequate hearing protection devices in accordance with Appendix M of the revised regulations. In order to comply with those regulations, employers should first consider noise levels at the design stage for new construction or for modifications to existing facilities. The Noise Control Section can provide a list of private acoustical consultants who have specific expertise in that area. Noise levels should also be specified when ordering new equipment. Due to similar noise legislation in the United States and Europe, manufacturers are beginning to produce quieter equipment or to offer noise control measures as an option. Technology has developed rapidly to achieve noise control in industries where it was previously thought impossible. It is also now techno- logically possible to retrofit older, noisy equipment. It is the employer’s responsibility to identify workers who are over-exposed to noise and to develop a time-phased com- pliance plan for reducing noise exposure to permissible levels. Already several forest product companies in the province are initiating or preparing such plans. Employ- ers with a large number of employees exposed to excessive noise may be required to submit their compliance plans to the Noise Control Section. Priority industries for noise control have been selected on the basis of noise level, number of workers exposed and hearing loss claims data. Beginning in September of this year, those industries will systematically be inspected by noise control officers. The acoustical engineers will be involved in reviewing compliance plans, meeting with company engineers and conducting educa- tional presentations. The Engineering Section of Prevention Services has assembled an information package on the design of planer enclosures and similar material is being prepared on other machine and operator enclosures. Copies of such material can be obtained through the Films and Posters Section, 5255 Heather Street, Vancouver, B.C. V5Z3L8. The Engineering Section has a represen- tative on a National Research Council committee working to promote noise control at the manufacturing level and representa- tives on several Canadian Standards Asso- ciation committees concerned with occupa- tional deafness. In the past, either in accordance with the regulations or on their own initiative, many employers have instituted engineering controls to reduce noise. Those efforts are to be commended; much progress was made in the 1970’s. In addition, many union organi- zations have been active in promoting hearing conservation for their members through encouraging engineering controls, annual audiometric tests and the wearing of hearing protection devices. In many instan- ces substantial reductions in noise levels have been achieved, some of which will be highlighted in future issues of the WCB Health and Safety Digest. As of the end of July, 1980, the Noise Control Section and senior representatives from the Inspection Department, i.e. Direc- tor of Inspection, Mr. Rick Knowlan and Assistant Director, Mr. Ted Newell, have contacted senior management representa- tives in the ten largest firms in the forest products industry. The purpose of these meetings is to outline the objectives and the operations plan for the Noise Control Sec- tion and the advantages to be obtained by the establishment of a noise control policy statement and compliance plan in major operations. Excessive noise is recognized internation- ally as the most pervasive of all industrial hygiene hazards. To combat it, technology and legislation are developing rapidly. It appears that a concerted effort now between the Board, union and management repre- sentatives stands a higher chance of success than ever before of achieving the goal of 90 dBA. It is improper for any member of the Safety Committee representing the Union membership, to bypass the Local Union and resort to any outside agency without first having the consent of the presiding Local Union Officer. Lumber Worker/August, 1980/3