qyE= iNiae wallbenenssttacennoeresousttiltlttnn.-ancotfaseeshone Ree Published Weekly at 650 Howe Street By THE TRIBUNE PUBLISHING COMPANY LTD. Telephones: Editorial, MA. 5857; Business, MA. 5288 Torn MCEIWEN q. ... oc ccc cece esate nee euec sees Editor Ivan Birchard Manager Subscription Rates: 1 Year, $2.50; 6 Months, $1.35. Printed by Union Printers at 650 Hewe Street, Vancouver, B.C. Authorized as second-class mail by the post-office department, Ottawa Call a special session now NE WEEK before Labor Day, 1947, an American O labor paper wrote: “Today marks the end of an era for the American labor movement. The era of the Wagner Act is over — the era of the Taft-Hartley Bill begins.” On this Labor Day the trade union movement of Brit- ish Columbia is well into a new era of industrial relations— the era of Bill 39. Trade union officials and members, com- pelled to withhold their labor power to secure just wage increases and improved working conditions, or even to fight discrimination against union members, are met with legal persecution and intimidation by the courts, armed with the extra-legal provisions of Bill 39. When this infamous Bill was being debated in the legi- slature, members of the Hart-Anscomb Coalition govern- ment ridiculed and pooh-poohed the fears of fines and civil suits against the unions or union members expressed by union leaders. In the Nanaimo laundry strike, and now in the strike of Vanccuver steel workers, it has been made very clear that the Coalition spoke tongue in cheek on this as on all other ‘assurances’ connected with Bill 39. Groggy with the defeat it sustained in the Nanaimo Laundry strike, the Coalition is now spending the tax- payers’ money flooding the province with a ‘Citizen’s Letter on Bill 39’, an eight-page distortion of the purpose and con- tent of Bill 39. In this manner it hopes to justify its prose- cution and intimidation of the trade union movement of British Columbia. While it fills the postal bags daily with this contemptible apolgia for sound labor relations, it serves court writs upon steel workers and their union, for whom no other action was possible. . . with steel operators refus- ing to bargain in good faith and stalling behind the designed obstructionist technicalities of Bill 39. ized labor in British Columbia, both AFL and _CIO-CCL unions have demanded a special session of the legislature to amend Bill 39. Opposition to its intolerable provisions is daily in evidence. Unions assert their right to conduct their own strike votes to back up their wage demands. It is not a question of being or not being law- abiding. It is just that Canadian labor will not submit to anything that smacks of fascism—even in an incipient form. Organized labor demands a special session of the legislature to wipe the shame of Bill 39 off the statute books, to enact a Labor Code which will give labor the recognition it has won—and the responsibility it can honestly and democatic- ally discharge. : Added to labor’s voice for a special session of the legis- lature, is the voice of rural B.C.—farmers, taxpayers’ organ-~ izations, and other groups, who have been and are being fleeced by the government’s imposition of an unjust and inequitable school tax. The Coalition’s taxation policies, as with its Bill 39, are loaded in favor of big business, and designed to place the burden of taxation and the mainten- ance of monopoly profit levels upon the backs of the primary prodicers and industrial workers. in effect in many rural municipalities, and the demand of the and rural residents has been clear-cut—a special session of the House to remedy the school tax fiasco. This Labor Day should mark a new determination for iter unity between the AFL and CIO-CCL unions in common cause to amend Bill 39. Together the unions should seek a closer unity with the rural and farm popula- tions, offering fraternal aid and assistance in securing re- dress in school taxation. Premier Hart’s promises that “some amendments to Bill 39 may be necessary” and “some relief in taxation may be undertaken” will only be realized when the labor and farmer movements of B.C., together with other progressive-minded people, unite and intensify _ their demands for an early session to correct the legislative damage done to workers and farmers by powerful monopoly © * * * ~ Tax strikes have been . British the ‘CCF News’ there is an editorial entitled “The Tragedy of Palestine.” It is one of those editorials which makes a socialist worker blush with shame, regardless of CCF, LPP or other affiliation. In a restrained and generous tone the Jewish Western Bulletin de- scribed the editorial as “. not sans taste, sans sense and sans policy . . . not to be expected from a ‘socialist’ paper.” Commenting on the anti-Jew- ish rioting in England recently, the editorial referred to hits a new low, which can only be equalled by the poisonous racist sewage of ‘Mein Kamf.’ We can only presume that in its anxi- ety to whitewash the action of the British Labor government in its handling of the Palestine mandate, the ‘CCF News’ editor resorted to the language of Goeb-* bels and Streicher in his pres- entation of a ‘solution’ of the Jewish question. “The blame for this (the anti- Semetic rioting—Ed.) must rest squarely on the shoulders of the Jews themselves,” says the ‘CCF News’ editorial. “. . . their very claim to Palestine is shaky to the point of being ridiculous “. . . much of the trouble has been the result of the British Government’s failure to realize that they are dealing with psy- chopathic cases who are not susceptible to reason and who thrive on martyrdom.” These are strange words to be used by a socialist (?). news- paper to air its opinion on the word’s most persecuted people. +Embodied in a ‘letter to the editor’ they would be bad enough, but at least it could be put down as the mental ravings of a Mos- ley, an Arcand, a Bilboa or a Norman Jacques. But they are the words of a leading editorial, reflecting official CCF attitude I: the August 7 issue of on the Jewish question—even ig- noring the fact that they are an insult to the many Jews who lead and support the CCF near: are a few points which should be made clear t CCF workers and others who do not view anti-Semitic violence and ‘rioting’ through the eyes of a Julius Streicher. First, that the Palestine mandate, implicit in ® mandate UA As we see it TUTTE ET the Balfour Declaration, was a promise made by a responsible British government, to aid in the restoration of.a National homeland for the Jews in Pales- tine — a promise made to the Jews. We are not here discuss- ing the merits or otherwise of that promise. The important thing to keep in mind is thar it was a promise—which succes-- sive British governments, tory, ‘tory-labor and labor, honored in theory, but failed to carry out in practice. Every single Labor in Party convention | since the issu- «: ance of the Bal four Declara- tion went o record as sup- porting that de claration — and, for Britain get- ing out of Pal- estine as an es- sential prere- quisite for the ‘amicable settle- Britain ment of Jewish- Tom McEwen Arab differences in the Holy Land. Secondly, the ‘CCF News’ in its anxiety to whitewash the Attlee-Bevin ‘socialist’ regime, fails to take into account what the British labor movement and > the trade unions have already condemned—that the anti-Semitic riots in England were instigated by the Mosley fascist gangs— “which have been allowed to re- sume their fascist activities in Britain without hindrance by the Attlee-Bevin government — fascist gangs who sought to ex- ploit the regrettable occurrences in the Holy Land for their own sinister ends in Britain. And most important of all, that the British labor movement and the Jewish and Arab labor movements in Palestine have al- ready branded the handful of Jewish terrorists, such as those who murdered the two British soldiers, as agents of powerful — British and American oil inter- ests, whose claim upon the oil and other resources of the Near East can only be held in an at- mosphere of bloodshed, terror, and a divided population. All this seems to have left the ‘CCF News’ editor unimpressed in his search of a ‘solution.’ ‘and especially to those ‘ By Tom McEwen i the annals of human Pro gress it has been the unsought martyrdom of the Jewish pee § ple which has given mankind some of its most cherished poo sessions in the realm of — literature, music and science. But according to the ‘CCF News the Jewish people are a nation. of “psychopathic cases who ares not susceptible to reason - - *' The only criticism it offer® Messrs. Attlee and Bevin “failure to realize” this? Even for a ‘solution’ to the problem, the ‘CCF News’ 4dié® in the putrid anti-Semitic mat — ure heap of the late Herr Dok tor Goebbels. Every evil, accord ing to the late propaganda chief © of the ‘Herrenfolk’ stemmed from ‘Jewish financiers.’ The poison was subtly brewed to leave the impression that Jews—bar none, had tremendou® economic power—for evil. ‘CCF News’ differs from Goeb bels—not in thesis, but directio™ — The Jews “. . . would be better advised to use their considerable — economic power to open ; doors of America to their pet fortunate co-religionists . -.° ~ To speak of “considerable eo nomic power” in relation to pes countless thousands of Jewis men, women and children ~ without a country, without ® ~ roof, hungry, ill-clad and sick, — shuttling backwards and ee wards across Europe wi all doors closed save Cyprus. concentration camP, an insult to the living who SUF vived the’ Nazi death factorie® of Hitler. The whole editori#? cast a reflection upon the Bie telligence of Canadian worker® who 100k a to the CCF for socialist leade™ ship. oe To accuse the Jewish people of “aiding and abetting > ° brained adventures in Pales@™ . . . because they are “psych pathic cases who are not Ae ceptible to reason . . -” 16 et give moral justification t? fee death camps of Oswiecim 9” Buchenwald . and to British concentration camps Cyprus. It is time conkaS e the CCF began making 8 CH up on their editorial writers ™ dishonor the columns of @ | cialist paper with the poison © ‘Mein Kamtf.’ PACIFIC TRIBUNE—PAGE that of a : Bo