a re fly ing fast and furi- |'s, 8 4y. Some are flagrant ‘at Ch as the calm assertion rs 'goslav diplomat who leatieg weered by nationalist hu Europe, was killed hats viet -paid” assassins. MH asec ruler type lie — if “tht @ thing strongly *ough a long enough even 1s Ven 1s no evidence, in ua the evidence is eq, ary, it will be be- Other, > ima x lies by speculation ahs, et but “trustworthy” it ae — and they are in ti votes, days. In this mat ont actually say erg think oy make your g aS at ee time there is dang- ne ay and disarmament, le. “ots Ministers or brass- ~ the elt the bogey type biggest SOViets are building 1 My Ba eae they are estab- Wor ype! base in Cuba or % the acever, Soviet ships len Thar or planes in the hg ; Que ‘ed was the big lie in cons “ping the credu- fat Rusgatt fear of an “im- w the Cold vasion”) that ae eee 2° long. UW (or Ty 27e, just plain ly «O° Lubor Zink) liek, , bay tora 4 look at the Aug. Yoo Star, heaq, te, Toronto Shige Gating ¢, “Neutral no "pact, 6 With the India- a Wow! > “hree parag- Reg? a | bees pela, India’s prime | TOW te Indira Gandhi, _ "St the policy laid ot itor. : pal begins, “By en- mur Publi Mereounee’ eekly ot Fo ae .C. Phone 685-5288. 00 one year ontrols Hees insists : roe ee VU with River military alli- , Vest Coast edition, Canadian Tr The big lie again... down by her father, the late Jawaharlal Nehru”. Did you spot it? The funda- mental untruth there is that one about the “20-year military al- liance”. All the rest flows from it. Now the India-Soviet friend- ship treaty is not secret — it has been published, all its pro- visions have been presented and debated in the Parliament of India and the Supreme Soviet of the USSR. It is NOT a mili- alliance! ean is a section in it that provides for consultations in the event that either of the signa- tories is attacked or threatened with aggression = consultations eserve e! ers you ae lied once, they say, others come easy. Thus eS Star weeps that the pact coul involve India bee les”, i.e., “the qua e eer Russia and China”. That’s the ‘fashionable big lie of our e. othe quarrel is between those who promote peace and those who foment war. And the Star is on the side of the war-mak- gain! s sthers is hypocritical advice to the USSR to mediate be- tween India and Pakistan rather: than “support of India against palisten the way Russia zeit ports the Arabs against Lohan Yes, there must be “no eet ination against a; > ivi : in Te Middle East A Southeast Asia . - . The fac that the United Nations neve strongly and repeatedly demane- ed that Israel withdraw from oS cupied Arab territories doesn cut any ice with the ae releleleceleresersiestatateteteteteresetstetetetetetetee eben eee Tri #,9,0, 0.0. 659,8,9,%.%,9,%,8aPetatatetetetatataterererererentets Editor—MAURICE RUSH : td Bldg., Mezzanine No. 3, 193 E. Hostings St, . Circulation Manager, ERNIE CRIST * Canada, $5.00 one year; $2.75 for six months. ! ‘ the: Merica and Commonwealth countries, $6.00 one year. ; * Ti CAN TRIBUNE would also be taug Under the U.S. guns Monday morning Canadian banker Robert MacIntosh, on learning of Pre- sident Nixon’s 10 percent surcharge on imports, exclaimed that this amounts to “putting a gun to the head of the rest of the world.” (Of course, he was referring to the shrinking capitalist world.) Within 24 hours Canada was “under the U.S. gun” in more than a figurative sense. Canadian Armed Forces infor- mation officers warned the public that “an undisclosed number of big U.S. B-52 nuclear bombers” would take part in “a little war game” over Ontario on Tuesday. Some Canadian F-101 jet fighters would accompany them... Is it an accident that, after dealing Canada a body blow with his economic measures, Nixon followed this up with a military show of strength over Can- ada? Was this a Yankee imperialist warning to Canadians in more senses than the one which Canada’s brasshats spoke of in their announcement? Why was this “little war game” or- dered at exactly this time when the masses of Canadians are not just per-: turbed but angry over Nixon’s econo- mic war against us and other capitalist untries? A » What business do our jet fighters have escorting U.S. nuclear bombers for “war games” over Canada? What business have U.S. bombers of any kind, and nuclear bombers. most of all, in Canadian skies? Do we have to wait until bombs drop, until Toronto and Montreal suffer the fate of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, until Canada is laid waste like most of Maet: nam before we start kicking them out? Let’s get out of NATO and NORAD - at the same time that we release our- selves from the clutches of the U.S. liar! hep defend Canada! The democratic way e people of the Ontario city of Seeeth Falls, over 80 percent of whom are Brench-speaking, are again asking that instruction in heir ‘secon- dary school be conducted in French, with a new phe ae be built for Eng- ish- king students. De a Peasonable request and the powers that be in Queen’s Park should grant it — not as a concession but as a right. ‘e is only one way to settle the augstion of the language of instruction in schools, and that is the democratic way — by lelURe Bela ace: and stu- selves decide. te deve ner like to see pupils divided according to religion | (the seperele school system is a relic of the past) or national origin. But the surest way to divide both students and the people is by enforcing a aenaee of instruc- ion not want. a ey Sere of Sturgeon Falls or any other community (and they don’t have to be the majority in a given Sun , area) want instruction in French, that’s hould have. : OF pute. A any such school English ht as a su =} tit bject. And — it would be to the good if in English- speaking schools in such communities as Sturgeon Falls (and why not even where the French-speaking don’t com- prise such a big portion of the popula- tion?) the French language was one of the subjects. Unity is the fruit of mutual under- standing and cooperation — never of domination and coercion. The family farm Canadian farmers are up in arms. In Prince Edward Island they are pro- testing their plight by blocking the highways under the leadership of the National Farmers Union. Across Can- ada they are boiling mad as well they may be since they have been handed down a sentence of ruin and death for most of them. We are unctuously told that there’s no help for it, the small family farms just can’t compete on the world mark- ets and they have to go. They must be swallowed up by the agri-vulture firms and the few big farmers. Sorry, but that’s the price we must pay for pro- gress, the vultures explain. They’re even willing to subsidize the farmers to go away—and die? We don’t oppose. technical progress in agriculture, and we don’t endow the family farm life with the sort of mystic social values Ontario NDP leader Ste- phe Lewis found in them in his other- wise commendable defense of the farm- ers’ interests at a meeting in Oshawa recently. We have seen too much back- breaking toil and heartbreak on those farms to idealize them. But we are against the vultures of monopoly and big landowners gobbling up the family farms and destroying the men and women who have fed us and much of the world: by their work. We want the family farms and the smal] farmers saved not in order to impede progress but to carry out that progress by being enabled, individually and finally through cooperative action, to introduce the highest techniques in farming and at the same time to build subsidiary industries in their localities. Otherwise, we’ll suffer what Oliver Goldsmith described in his “Deserted Village”: Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey, Where wealth accumulates and men decay. Pictorial record It takes a bit of doing to compress 50 years of exciting history — the record of the Communist Party of Canada in our country’s momentous past half- century — in term of photos and com- mentary in both French and English. That’s what the C.P. has done-in the 40-page pictorial titled “Fifty Years of the Communist Party of Canada 1921- © 19712” Both space limitation and gaps in the photographic record that has been preserved have made this a formidable job. We are glad to affirm that it is a job well done. _ PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, AUGUST 20, 1971—PAGE 3