| ‘ Hiri vt 15] Wyant J : 1 fers ee! weet Vol. 8, No. 23 rit jee hts: ea i , bly, | My plist iD ST RT RIC REV Le worsening yey fie a, ent AIG Bee Lea Vancouver, British Columbia, Friday, June 10, 1949 Price Five Cents ‘Strike goes on‘ - Thompson UNIONS SUPPORT CSU, HIT SUSPENSION BY TLC AFL chieftain William Green’s order to the Trades and Labor Congress of Canada this week to suspend the fighting Canadian Seamen’s Union has aroused a storm of indignation in the labor movement from coast to coast. It is an order to a supposedly autono- mous Canadian trade union center to cast out a Canadian union chartered by the Congress and accept, in effect, the American- dominated Seafarers’ International Union (AFL), which by its scabbing tactics in the current East Coast strike has surrendered all claim to be a legitimate labor organization. Buckling under combined pressure from Green, the Canadian government and the U.S. state department, TLC president Percy Bengough suspended the CSU, and shamefacedly hinted that a way might be found to issue a separate charter to West Coast CSU men, who are not on strike. (To this, James Thompson, Pacific vice- president, replied grimly: “‘We are a part of the Canadian Seamen’s Union. ) In a decision calculated to harass the striking seamen’s picket lines, Mr. Justice Manson this week refused to lift an anti-picketing injunction on a strike-bound freighter in Vancouver, and termed the CSU strike “‘illegal.” The indignation aroused by Congress’ fratricidal act and Ben- gough’s shameful betrayal of trade union principles found expression in refusal of delegates to Vancouver Trades and Labor Council meeting this week to accept the unseating of CSU representatives. Using the technicality that official suspension documents had not yet been received from Congress, angry delegates overruled the chair and reinstated CSU “with voice and vote” until official notification of suspension arrived. Answer of British workers to suspension of the CSU by Con- gress was an extension of sympathy walkouts by English dockworkers, who have consistently refused to unload scab-manned Canadian ships. At Liverpool 6,000 dockers on a sympathy strike were joined by another 2,000. When British troops began to unload a scab ship, the Montreal City, at Avonmouth, crews of strikebound ships at nearby Bristol decided to join the CSU on the picket lines. From Blackpool came news that the Empress of Canada, crack CPR liner, will carry most of her 4,693-ton cargo back to Canada because dockers refuse to unload it. Continued on back page See ELECTION Uc Put Morgan at top of poll “BE There’s a symbolism in this picture of two young LPP sup- porters placing their candidate's poster at the top of the pole in their hard-hitting campaign to put Nigel Morgan at the top of the provincial poll in Alberni on June 15. The belt and spurs were put to good use after petty supporters of “Honest” Jim Mowat, “Independent” Coalition candidate, went around ripping down all Morgan’s posters. Coalition, CCF leaders have no differences on main issues By HAL GRIFFIN ts H ow will the election of this Part, Y or that aff , Children o» ect me and my th That’s the question © Van, Rests Couver News-Herald sug- Selves that its readers ask them- Deeg] ing Wednesday. And, for the Coalition to save them- selves, “their children and their children following” from, all the evils of an illusory socialism promised or not promised by the CCF—it depends on which candi- date is speaking and to what audience. Nonetheless, it’s a fair ques- tion, but umhappily one to which progressive voters in a majority of provincial constituencies will find no satisfactory answer. The influencing of national policies toward peace or war and the shaping of the provincial econ- omy to impose or ease the bur- den of the developing crisis on the working people will lie with the new government of British Columbia. But it is also true that whichever of the two pro- graceful cloak for the ugly out- tagonists in this election, the lines of capitalism. That’s the Coalition and the CCF, wins a_ impression the CCF, to a lesser majority there is no irreconcil- €xtent in this than in past elec- able difference on fundamental 0m campaigns, has sought to : create in order to win votes. It’s issues of policy between them. also the impression the Coalition, to a greater extent in this than in past election campaigns, has sought to create in order to Scare votes away from the CCF. A few of the CCF candidates In the eyes of a great many voters the CCF is identified with socialism, the Coalition with free enterprise, which is only a more