PORT FROM CHINA uined b : PEKING ae x A’s tea trade, which has €n steadily declining. during ee few decades, is now a oe again. Tea exports last ae es double those of 1949, Lae a Soviet Union and the , ere Democracies the biggest he mers, ‘This year exports * expected to be still greater. WO years ago the People’s » Severnment set up the China Tea the : boo . ey _to take charge of ete cultivation, manufac- . Pee and sale of tea on e _itihe scale. It was decided oe Hon Ore the neglected tea plan- Tem S, extend tea growing and oe ae priority to production of ee tea for export. Se is the home of the tea i es than 2,000 years ago eee inese people were culti- tiny a and by the eighth cen- a e plant was being grown hal Province south of the ee River. For many cen- ae Cainese tea dominated the oa market, reaching a record he are of, 240,000,000 pounds * sia 6, Thereafter, the trade gee declined to little more a 0,000,000 pounds annually - Pre-liberation years. Under the Chiang Kai-shek. re- We aes tea exports to the Sov- Mth Pe. were banned, even ee Ph this action cost China 4 +»: ange purchases were ~~ ed Once-flourishing tea trade, Chiang, now revived around 100,000,000 ‘pounds a year. ‘This ban was followed by an- other against tea exports to the Mongolian People’s Republic. At home, the profiteering poli- cies followed by the Kuomintang tea monopoly were equally ruin- ous. Low prices to growers and disgust that ‘would be understandable to almost anybody — he snap- ped back: “Oh, hell! Tell ‘em | we captured 47 hills and 46 valleys.” ay ee Later that news agency man learned that his Tokyo col- league had faithfully relayed his report and it had made front-page news in many Am- erican papers.° + and a dozen other staunch work- ing-class leaders in the United States. Five days before, the leading editorial in For a Lasting Peace had opened with these words: “The more distant the period separating us from the end of World War Two, the clearer it becomes that U.S. imperialism, | pursuing a policy of aggression and preparation for another world war, is taking the path of Hitlerism. . . . The imperial- ists are seeking, first of all, to __ crush the resistance of the peo- ples, “to destroy the “democratic — liberties won. by the masses, to — smash the peace movement. They want first to kill freedom — so that it will be easier to kill peace,” : e In the same week, at Ottawa,, the men of the ruling American _ Party introduced a series of amendments to the Criminal ‘Code. St. Laurent and Garson had it in mind to celebrate the 84th an- niversary of Confederation with a stab in the vitals of Canadian © democracy. . Their Made-in-USA amendments were perfectly adapted to that purpose. : Criticism of policies of war pre- paration is threatened with war- time sanctions even though the country be not at war. “Seditious libel,” seditious conspiracy” or “treason,” depending on the whim of the thought-control police, are the weapons at the disposal of the ruling foes of peace. Criticism of Yankee domineering and war- mongering, which might “influ-~ ence” the armed forces of the USA stationed in this country, comes under the heading of “of- fences of seditious nature.” iy Our liege-lords are in Washing- ton and Wall Street. Who says so? The government in Ottawa. A mare usque ad mere. From. sea to sea, our proud Dominion. Whose? ssa _ Whati the ruling rich and their --servitors in Ottawa are panicked © z by is the jubilation reported among Canadian troops in Korea at the proposal for a cease-fire, made by the Soviet Union. The vicious attacks on demo- cratic liberties bear witness to . weakness, not to strength. For in the struggle for peace, peoples are going to win. J PACIFIC TRIBUNE — JULY 6, 1951 — PAGE 9 ‘ \ iris Fs ae the