The next five years—Canada and USSR By EMIL BJARNASON aian tare the prospects facing Cana- Near Sag during the next five dict? all we be so bold as to pre- musty ProBNOstication we might make ing the hee from present realities. Dur- Ga, aee winter of 1970-71, a million the one ‘ Were out of work, victims on Ceases Bed of “normal” cyclical pro- on the ot Capitalist development, and Teactiong €r of the cynical policies of a ely an government which deliber- Ostensible People out of work for the Ut the Purpose of curbing inflation. than the paure , Which is much worse cure at an Is€ase, turns out to be no Of this ye - During the winter months annual er the cost of living rose at an Month ic of 5% — the highest three he ease in 10 years. < een of the past continues Ctises of Of inflation alternating with Y hittin unemployment and periodical- at a ee peaks simultaneously — Unemplo € our situation in 1975: the Phage yment phase, the inflationary _» © both together? Perh: a 3 Enter i Some new features will Often thr Picture. The government has tog try fatened, without so far daring On orga Cut its threats, to clamp down Wages 12d labor and put a freeze on ance of 7 fantime curbing the resist- Org € population with new Public ‘ Acts, theft gout €conomic statisticians put how ane uters to work to calculate addeg Y More of our people will be S0cial agi tte Million or so now on ho Bee ttnice? Have they calculated © depeng, Millions more will by 1975 Now tore €nt on the Old Age Pension, of living n at $80, regardless of the cost 8, by 8 Ndoubtedly, they have done NOt bean, chow their findings have Spégg,“USed to adorn the budget * to pn if the Canadian worker wishes Ven in nat lies in store for him. Robbie B € relatively near future, like fear, ao only guess and t Cetin Not be so. The fears, un- are a Msecurity of the Canadians arch Rp iable consequence of the rand in conn.pianless system. They Wing j, .cUtrast to the lot of people Planned societies. €ncy of united action ot urg es fight for bot movement in the a the Beil e Co ca Committee of the Its Mist Pa Pri Solution’ 17-19 meeting. The re- Sin : | Part: nt, Statistics on unem- deci; Tport to show a March ae in the month of are ce At the same time i SS people reported as De 3 4 Small labor force. De have se of thousands. of in n fact t Topped out of sight. ee Se in 4° IS a considerable 4 Who Gathe Number of work- ni Oe, € unemployed. It is a ion ¢ ws et well over one nd ans are unemploy- C S int of ning work, Rca se . an rents cruel and in Bia, of cooling the 8 mags deliberately creat- of 84 to pyp™™Ployment. that @empIg ve e8eering number Dum yed at least twice Working poor”, ds of self-em- t of business by iad Tete pe, econ Deo Omic conditions, ale €eking to join the he first time, Tr number of § > Ww < Ponsibit; pnen With family an for ¢ (\)) tegting “or large ties eking out: an existence on public welfare and/ or in jobs at starvation pay. Jobs was emphasized in This, together with monopoly- tre Solution adopted by rigged prices on necessities of life, high interest rates, unbear- tty of Canada at able rents and housing costs, At the 24th Congress of the Com- munist Party of the Soviet Union, held in Moscow this month, the Soviet people were given a blueprint of their future. The indices of the ninth Five- Year Plan spelled out in detail what will happen to incomes, pensions, con- sumer goods, housing etc. The Soviet citizen was enabled to see his future up to 1975. Because this is the ninth Five-Year Plan, following eight previous plans which were successfully fulfilled, the people have cause to know that these targets are not the mere demagogic promises of politicians, but reliable forecasts of what will be accomplished by the collective activity of the popula- tion and its government. Let us look briefly at those prospects. Unemployment? Leonid Brezhnev warned that the plan will have to be fulfilled by rising productivity because there simply are not enough people, even in that vast country, to fill all of the available jobs. Inflation? Twenty years of stable prices have given the Soviet people the assurance that this problem will not arise. To quote Brezhnev’s report: “The big and complicated task of saturating the market with consumer goods must be carried out with state retail prices remaining stable, and moreover, as the necessary economic preconditions are created, price reductions should follow for some consumer items.” Note that Brezhnev spoke of saturat- ing the market with-consumer goods. For anti-Soviet commentators with their stubborn insistence that a social- ist society cannot satisfy consumer wants, this will be an arresting thought. But it is a realistic one. * * % For two generations, the Soviet people have had to tighten their belts in order to satisfy higher priorities. First came the desperate necessity of defending their country in two long and destructive wars. Then the need to build a powerful heavy industry base as the precondition for consumer production. Then the need to channel enormous resources into education and health facilities. And finally, to solve the most gigantic housing problem ever faced by an advanced country. Those priorities have been met. Democratic Party, the Commun- ist Party of Canada should be invited to actively participate. Coupled with the above pro- posal for immediate action for jobs, steps need to be taken to But one should not imagine that the Soviet Union is only now beginning to concern itself with consumer goods production. The fact is that for the past 10 years, output of all types of consumer goods has been rising rapid- ly. The pace and scope of that increase has been obscured by an inherent fea- ture of consumer durables, namely, that if the useful life of an appliance is 10 years, then it takes 10 years at a certain level of production before the total supply to the population reaches the corresponding level. The output of consumer goods in- creased by 49% during the past five years. It is planned to increase that much during the next five. Thus, what is new about the ninth Five-Year Plan is not the high rate of increase of con- sumption, but the fact that it applies to a level of consumption that is al- ready high. Take refrigerators, for example. In 1960, Soviet output was about one- tenth of the U.S. level. By 1970, it had reached the U.S. level—about four: mil- lion units a year. The target figure for 1975 is 6.7 million units, or about 170% of the current U.S. output. Simi- lar output levels apply to washing machines, sewing machines, TV sets, etc. . Although the planned average in- crease in consumer goods output is 48%, such a rate is unnecessary for some items such as leather footwear which already substantially exceeds U.S. levels. On the other hand, house- hold and cultural goods as a whole are to be increased by 80%. *& * aK During the five-year period, the real per capita income of the population will increasé 33%. In Canadian terms, this is equivalent to an increase every year in wages and pensions of 5%, over and above the cost of living. The manner in which this rise in real income will be distributed is spell- ed out in advance, setting the dates for increases in wages, increases in pen- sions and reductions in taxes. Also there will be a huge increase in state expenditures for health, education and other free services to the population. * * * At the same time, it should be recog- any waiting period; out a means test; ever-rising taxes, inadequate or non-existing and health care, and it is easy to see why there is a phenomenal increase in poverty, which must be directely related to unem- ployment in the first place. — The results of these conditions cannot be anything else then ex- tended welfare rolls, the cost of which, in turn, is again charged workers who are employed and those least able to pay, particul- artly at the municipal level... This Central Committee of the Communist Party of Canada solidarizes itself with the nume- rous and urgent appeals by 1m- portant sections of the trade union movement calling upon the Canadian Labor Congress to initiate an all-Canada Full Em-~ ployment Confe out a program an a campaign for jobs as an In able right of every Canadian. To make such a conference representative of the working people of Canada, all unions, af- filiated or not, farmers organiza- tions and unemployed, the New rence to map d chart a public organize the unemployed as part of the campaign for full employ- ment, for their rights as citizens, quate income for themselves and their families while unemployed. Calling again on the Trudeau government to reverse its econo- mic policy of catering to mono- poly, and to embark upon a pol- icy of economic growth and full employment for the benefit of the Canadian pecnle: ae follow- i emands were listed: A oe construction of 250,000 subsidized public housing units 1972; : / e Substantial allocation of funds at both the federal and provin- cial Jevels for public works, in- cluding financing of needed pub- lic works at the municipal level; e Immediate action to legis- late a $2.50 per hour minimum wage at both the federal and provincial levels of government, e Unemployment insurance benefits to the amount of 80% of the average full-time working wage and payable for the dura- tion of unemployment without e Protect the family farmer and raise family farm income. e Double the level of old age security pensions, payable with- e 100% benefits and coverage under workmen’s compensation including their right to an ade- laws; | e Increase general welfare as- sistance and remove the cost from local governments entirely; e Remove low income earners from tax rolls by doubling the basic exemptions, and lowering of excise and sales taxes on life’s necessities. e Immediate tax reform to re- move the cost of education, health and welfare from pro- erty taxation at the municipal between now and the end of yen ig eA tax policy based upon abil- ity to pay, including a steeply graduated personal incomes tax, and a tax on all capital gains whether realized or unrealized; e A Prices Review Board to publicly review. all price creases, and with adequate pow- er to call witnesses and to exam- ine the justification or otherwise of requested alterations; eA moratorium of plant clos- ures and lay-offs in both the PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, APRIL 30, 1971—PAGE 7 nized that there are some areas in which Soviet material standards lag behind the West and will still lag at the end of the ninth Five-Year Plan. The most conspicuous example is in the supply of individual passenger automobiles, where the planned output for 1975 is 1,300,000 or about--one- sixth of U.S. levels. In view of.the fact that alternative transportation is avail- able in the form of superior transit and railway services, those who are con- cerned about the environmental ef- fects of the automobile may well argue that this is an advantage. Another, and possibly more serious lag, is in electric energy output. Al- though the rate of growth of output is high, the planned output will be only 4,000 kilowatt-hours per capita com- pared with about 7,000 in the U.S. and 10,000 in Canada. * * * The ninth Five-Year Plan represents a turning point in the peaceful compe- tition between socialism and capital- ism..In many material branches of production, the projected Soviet levels are far above present U.S. levels, and greater than any probable 1975 U.S. level. This applies, for example, to steel production which is planned to be 142 to 150 million long tons; oil production; housing; milk and dairy products; fish; cement; and many cate- gories of consumer durable goods. International comparisons of indices and of G.N.P. are subject to innumer- able statistical objections, but their movement gives us—in the rough, at any rate—some measure of relative progress. At $710,000,000,000 the Sov- iet social product in 1970 was about 75% of the U.S. level. The planned increase of 41% will raise it by 1975 to something over 105% of the present U.S. level. Even should the U.S. achieve a normal rate of growth during the same period, this indicates that Ame- rica’s days of economic supremacy are numbered. ° In the meantime, the Soviet citizen enjoys the security of guaranteed em- ployment, free medical services, free education, subsidized housing, and the sense of well-being that comes from . knowing that conditions will continue to improve every year. alternative employment is found for every worker affected by such contemplated closures and lay-offs; e Public Review Boards with labor representation at both the federal and provincial levels of government to conduct public investigations into each and every case of proposed plant closures; e Wherever such closure is found to be unavoidable there must be provision for severance pay of a minimum of one month’s pay each year of employment for every worker to be laid off; e The assumption of full gov- ernmental responsibility, at both the federal and provincial levels, to assure economic growth and expanded job opportunities, wherever need be by national- ization and public ownership and control; e That national enterprises and Crown corporations under public ownership and democratic : control be established to de- im- velop secondary industries for processing and manufacture of our abundant resources, and with special emphasis on areas that are presently under-devel- oped and suffering from econo- mic stagnation. ~ private and public sector until