LABOR —_— Clause ‘smokescreen’ for port problems In a report delivered to all members of Parliament Monday, the Canadian Area of the International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union termed the employ- ers’ attack on the union’s container clause ‘a smokescreen” that is being used to cover up the problems of the port of Vancouver. The report appeared on MPs desks as they were preparing to deal with back-to- work legislation introduced Monday by federal Labor Minister Pierre Cadieux to end the lockout on B.C. docks and impose the terms of federal mediator Dalton Lar- son’s conciliation report. The proposed leg- islation, called the Maintenance of Ports Operation Act, 1986, would also refer the contentious container clause to an indus- trial inquiry commission which would bring down binding recommendations by June 30, 1987. ILWU secretary-treasurer Dan Cole told the Tribune Nov. 18 that NDP MPs would be seeking to introduce amendments to the bill which would turn all the issues in the dispute over to the inquiry commission, with the existing collective agreement to continue until the report.is brought down. ““We’re asking that there be no legislated Larson report and that all issues be put to the commission for binding recommenda- tions,” Cole said. He emphasized that the Larson report “heavily favors the employers. It breaks the pay structure that we've established over a long period, it introduces a 12-hour day on some bulk operations, it offers nothing on pensions and it changes the work rules in some cases.” The report also provides little in the way of wage increases, offering only zero per cent, two per cent and three per cent over a three year agreement. If the back-to-work legislation is passed in its current form, those would be the contract terms until the agreement expires in 1988. Cole said that the scenario enacted by the federal government in introducing the legis- lation Monday was basically that written by the B.C. Maritime Employers’ Association which twice imposed a lockout on the pro- DAN COLE...ILWU launches ‘port awareness’ campaign. vince’s 3,500 longshoremen with the aim of getting back-to-work legislation. ILWU president Don Garcia com- mented angrily Monday that the heavy fines provided for in the legislation leave long- shoremen with no choice but to accept the legislation. ““We’ll wait dumbly, like lambs going to the slaughter,” he said. The BCMEA has waged an unrelenting campaign in the media and at the bargain- ing table against the union’s 16-year-old container clause. Under that clause, first negotiated in the 1970 collective agreement, containers des- tined for more than one location within roughly a 90-mile radius of the port — east to Hope, south to the U.S. border and west to Vancouver Island — must be unpacked by ILWU members. The BCMEA has attacked the clause, claiming that it is union “featherbedding” and that the continued existence of the clause is causing shippers to divert container cargo to U.S. ports such as Seattle and Tacoma. But that fixation with the container clause only covers up the inadequacies of Vancouver’s container facilities, the ILWU argued, and nothing would. be solved by eliminating the clause. “We know that eliminating the container clause and crossing your fingeéts in the hope that increased business will cost us jobs without insuring that one more container moves through Vancouver,” Cole said. Significantly, that point was underscored by Mic Dinsmore, the director of marine operations for the Port of Seattle, who is quoted in a union background paper as stating: “In Canada, you have issues that far exceed the containér clause. We have spent a lot of time and money ensuring that we have the most modern state-of-the-art facili- ties, not only in North America, but in the world. You’ve done none of that in Van- couver.” The union has launched a campaign entitled ““A World Class Port for a World Class City” to highlight the need for major changes to port management and the devel- opment of new container facilities to meet growing trade on the Pacific Rim. Cole said that the short term objective . was to get MPs to see the issues more clearly before they voted on the back-to-work legis- lation. But the union will continue with the campaign to convince the federal govern- ment as well as local businesses, shippers and transportation companies of the need for long range planning and development. The union is calling immediately for the establishment of a “port users’ committee,” made up of representatives of the city of Vancouver, the federal government, ship- pers, railways and the labor movement, which would have a mandate to develop plans for the port and advise the port authority. The union is also pressing for greater autonomy for the port of Vancouver and increased funding for upgraded facilities so that Vancouver can compete with U.S ports. In a background paper, the union noted that Vancouver has only five container cranes compared to 10 for the port of Tacoma and 21 in Seattle. ““We need at least three new container cranes to become mort competitive with U.S., ports,” it stated. In addition, the U.S. ports have beet “agoressively marketing” the availability ° their facilities and have consistently invest in new equipment. Vancouver has dont neither, because decisions “are made 3,0%¥ miles away and Ottawa has not made# financial commitment,” the union said. ~ Employers have also stated that shippers are unloading at the ports of Seattle and Tacoma and trucking cargo to Vancouve because of the container clause. But there are no guarantees that the cargo WORT come to Vancouver if the clause were elim nated, the ILWU emphasized, because 0" port authorities “will do whatever they can to keep containers flowing through thet! ports. Many shippers now use U.S ports even for B.C=bound cargo because they shipping to both U.S. and Canadian des nations and can cut costs by carrying con tainers for both countries on the sames¥ and taking advantage of volume discou® for terminal lease charges. Those od reductions more than make up for the add expense of trucking cargo from Seattle Tacoma to Vancouver. -Y Despite the compelling arguments, Cole noted, the federal government hasn't listen so far to demands for port changes. In Ke y he said, citing the proposed changes Western Grain Transportation Act. ‘ change in particular would allow coe cargoes to be trans-shipped to U.S. porte" shipment overseas. Pe ey a “If those changes go through (th ‘ ) the now before a parliamentary committe result will be the loss of direct port job longshoremen and many spin-off j@ Le Vancouver,” he warned. Cole said the union would be pressing lit ? port campaign over the next several We including a lobby of western premiers = ing the first ministers’ conference in Val couver this week and meetings with oth groups. We need your help in getting these out Mike wants to move our bundles. Of papers, that is. Tidy soul that he is, our business manager Mike Proniuk (he’s the one in the picture with the Tribs) hates seeing unordered bundles of the Tribune lying around the office. For that matter, so do the rest of us. At just past the half-way point in our annual fall circulation drive, we've found a good response among our readers and supporters to our entreaties to spread the pape news around B.C. Many have taken us up on our special, limited, introductory offer © three months for $3, have taken out a full year’s sub or have renewed their curr But there are still a few bundles lying around after mailing day. To really help the Tribune clean up in this year’s drive — and to help British Columbians clean up in the fight for better working conditions and a better life generally — we’re urging our friends to help distribute the paper on picket lines, at community meetings, and wherever else people roll up their sleeves to fight for peace, jobs and progress. By ordering a bundle today for your trade union meeting, civic organization OF peace group, you'll help bring a fresh perspective to the task. And it'll make more room OF so we can perform our other duties. a en aoe es ease ee FIRIBUNE Published weekly at 2681 East Hastings Street Vancouver, B.C V5K 125. Phone 251-1186 ee ee ee era re A a Se oo €4 6 Ble eee 8. bed wt ee 6b fb 00 + 0.0.3: 0) 0. ©: ee See ON RRRES 908 oe Postal Code lam enclosing 1 yr. $160 2yrs. $280) 6mo. $100 Introductory Offer $30 Foreign 1 yr. $25 LD) Bill me later Oo READ THE PAPER THAT FIGHTS FOR LABOR as 1'5 f ent one — _ 12 e PACIFIC TRIBUNE, NOVEMBER 19, 1986