“I had a good home, a devoted wife, six fine children, but I squandered everything we had on food...” 50 years ago... POLICE AND SCABS ATTACK MINERS EDMONTON — One provincial policeman is in hospital, and two badly bruised as a result of their wanton attack at the behest of wives, _ the mine owners, upon miners on picket duty in the Edmonton mine district. : Assisted by their starving the miners, after being ejected from their homes to make room for scabs, and as- uniformed saulted by the plainclothes and thugs, stood their ground and administered a "severe drubbing to the hood- in YUMs. Thirty-five scabs sought refuge in the Edmonton Hotel to escape the wrath of the outraged miners. The miners came out on top, and one mine manager is anxious to settle as he sees that his slaves show no sign of weakening, but seem determined to fight to the last ditch, The Worker, January 1, 1923 25 years ago... LABOR WILL OUST THE DREW REGIME The Ontario Federation of Labor, comprising the 200,000- strong Trades and Labor Con- gress unions in the province, gave excellent leadership at its convention last weekend. This is the sort of language Premier Drew hates to hear. His’ government’s. path is strewn with the wreckage not only of his 22-point program, but the labor bills which his Tory puppets steamrolled at the last session of the legislature. The OFL’s resolutions—on‘ vot- ing unity, prices, wages—consti- tute a lead for all labor in On- tario; if followed up by organ- ized unity, the Drew government, the main obstacle to progress, can be swept away at the next election... Unity is the watchword! Tribune, Jan. 24, 1948. * Worth quoting: “We honor now those Southerners who stood by the Union when it was attacked by the Confederacy, just as we honor those Germans who rejected Hitler and his monstrous wars and were martyrs to the cause of freedom and humanity. Why do we find it so hard to accept | this elementary lesson of history; that some wars are so deeply immoral that they must be lost, that the war in Vietnam is one of those wars, and that those who resist it are the truest patriots?” Professor Henry Steele Commager in N.Y. REVIEW OF BOOKS, October 5, 1972 ! The contest in the world today is between two kinds of men: those who believe in the old jungle individualism, and those who believe in cooperative efforts for the securing of a better life for all. Dr. Norman Bethune. Editor — MAURICE RUSH Published weekly at Ford Bldg., Mezzanine No. 3, 193 E. Hastings St., Vancouver 4, B.C. Phone 685-5288. Circulation Manager, FRED WILSON Subscription Rate: Canada, $5.00 one year; $3.00 for six months North and South America and Commonwealth countries, $6.00 one year. All other countries, $7.00 one year Second class mail registration number 156 Editorial Comment... Throne Speech a challenge The Speech from the Throne opening Canada’s 29th Parliament on Januar 4, placed new challenges before all poli- tically conscious Canadians. The Trudeau minority Government tried, understandably, to touch all bases to ensure its own continued exist- ence. Fence-mending, and its depen- dence on the NDP, influenced its pre- sentation — but left unchanged its loyalty to monopoly capitalism. It should not be overlooked that some of its fence-mending was in deference to the Right, such as the promise to cure so-called unemployment insurance abuses. It is not the first time a capitalist government has had to make peace of- ferings to the electorate, nor is it the first time the Canadian working class and its allies have recognized the op- ortunity to extract from an unfriend- y government legislation embodying progressive features. The Throne Speech is notable, not only for the many bases it touched, but also for its failure to deal adequately with certain vital requisites. Whether, for instance, the Govern- ment “has moved out of the side streets of social betterment into the main road of a guaranteed annual income,” as the Toronto Globe & Mail editorializes, re- mains to be seen. (The Globe switched to the Liberals at the last election.) One is hard-pressed to find the term guaranteed annual income in any Speech reference other than to the aged, the blind and the disabled — wel- come as is that concession. And we have no guarantees, on the basis of previous government perform- ances, that it will be adequate, even though guaranteed. The vague lan- A win for peacemakers The government resolution criticiz- ing the U.S. war in Vietnam represents a people’s victory. Years of effort by thousands of Canadians, intensified during the last two weeks of 1972, at last induced the Government to tell the United States, publicly, that it is grave- ly concerned and “deplores the recent largescale bombing in the Hanoi- Haiphong area,” and requests the Unit- ed States to refrain from resuming the bombing. That is the view of the overwhelming majority of Canadians, a fact all parties in the House sensed. Trade unions, churches, universities, two provincial governments, as well as such bodies as the Toronto City Council urged a pro- test to the U.S. Canadians spoke out by every means of communications, in- cluding an impressive New Year’s Day newspaper ad in Toronto signed by 600 persons, and a delegation to Ottawa on Jan. 4. Then the Government acted. Had it not, the NDP had decided to place such a motion. ; : Fault may ‘be found with the mild- ness of the rebuke, but its accomplish- ment is a major win. The people tri- umphed and the Nixon war lords were dealt another humiliating blow. Con- gratulations to the peacemakers! guange of the Speech merely suggests that the working poor should not be getting less than those on unemploy- ment insurance. Hardly justification for the Globe’s rushing into the “main road.” Not by any means does preliminary talk of a guaranteed annual income dispose of the immediate need for a jobs policy. And the federal govern- ment’s jobs policy is the same old pre- election, makeshift scheme, with hand- outs to private industry. The speech from the Throne is de- signed to maintain in power the Liberal big business government by promising limited concessions to the electorate. How far will it really go, for instance to curb foreign control, to tap multi- million profits, instead of the wage- earning tax payer, for increased social needs? Does the vague promise “to at- tain reasonable price stability” mean just that or has the Government some thought of lining up with Tory (and Toronto Star) demands for a wage freeze? The Throne Speech provides more questions than answers, but it is the ground on which (with the NDP hold- ing the balance of power in the House, and mass people’s action outside Par- liament) a united working class can wrest concessions from the Govern- ment. Canada’s stature as a spokesman for peace and detente must not be permit- ted to diminish because of failure to be decisive on the German question. The German Democratic Republic and the Federal Republic of Germany signed their historic treaty on Decem- ber 21, 1972. Even previous to that numerous countries, including one of the major Commonwealth countries, India, had granted recognition. The Canadian government, always hanging back from such decisions, found a way to make recognition condi- tional on an event it may have assumed would never happen. It announced it would begin negotiations after the GDR and FRG had settled mutual recogni- tion. Well, that has been accomplished; there is no longer any excuse. A Canadian government spokesman was quoted some time back as saying that Canada would certainly not be last to recognize the GDR. If we don’t move soon we'll indeed be last. Already such NATO countries as Ice- land and Belgium have established dip- lomatic ties with the GDR, and Britain and Denmark are in the process of doing so. To date, some 40 countries have exchanged diplomatic recognition with the GDR. Must Canada again drag its feet untii the USA gives approval? Enough of taking our cue from the bully of the world. Catch up with history Messrs. Trudeau and Sharp! Demonstrate Can- ada’s support for the historic ste towards lasting peace, achieved by : GDR-FRG treaty. Recognize the Ger- man Democratic Republic now! PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, JANUARY 12, 1973—PAGE 3