by the hungweipings. The books they
ited to burn and the historical monu-
its they wanted to destroy, on their
ders were burned and destroyed by
je hungweipings.
But all these actions, committed by
through their puppets, just as the
paign to rectify style” and other
ie “mass movements”, staged by Mao
ng in the past, are demagogically
ed by them as a result of apply-
“line of the masses”, that is, “the
: from the masses — to the masses”,
some kind of “big democracy” of
‘masses, as a “real mass movement”
| “demands of the masses.” But all
demagogy cannot deceive anyone.
the hungweipings were sent to
Mmit their infamies, Mao Tse-tung and
§ group repeatedly and openly declared
lat no one, no institution or organiza-
m, including military institutions, had
€ right to interfere in the actions of
hungweipings or stop them, because
hungweipings were the “little initia-
and “the vanguard” which was
ng out the “cultural revolution”
x the personal guidance, the per-
hal organization and personal leader-
Ip and command of Mao Tse-tung.
milarly, the hungweipings, too, often
Outed that Mao Tse-tung was their
pren commander-in-chief,” that
were the “guards commanded by
lang Ching.”
Replacing the Young Communist Lea-
le and Young Pioneer Organization,
| hungweipings and hunghsiaopings,
ao Tse-tung thereby wanted not only
abolish the assistants and reserve of
¢ Communist Party, but also to abolish
& most politically conscious, the most
ganized vanguard of the youth and
n, the vanguard richest in revo-
traditions, in order to make
!young people and children easily sus-
Mtible to his fraud and convert them
lo his personal reactionary tool for
e.
day many hungweiping detach-
e have escaped this control and
ulions of young people have become
fare of the criminal character of the
revolution” and the reaction-
ture of Mao Tse-tung’s “thought.”
Mao Tse-tung group is brutally sup-
essing them, sending millions of young
and women to remote areas and
countryside in order that they
d not be able to raise a rebellion
t Mao Tse-tung and his group in
l@ cities under the selfsame slogan “a
bellion is a just cause!”
it this does not save the Situation,
Se they can raise an anti-Mao
lion” not only in the cities to-
with the masses of workers, but
in the villages, together with the
t masses. There is no doubt what-
that China’s younger generation
hnot tolerate for long the present situa-
a. It will necessarily rise up more and
me to struggle against the baneful
me of Mao Tse-tung and his group,
| 4 bright future for themselves and
country,

He is attacking the working class
Splitting its ranks. He has disband-
All-China Federation of Trade

Tse-tung is breaking up the Party
on10 wisdi ao Lid of betray.

of the working class—the Chinese Com-
munist Party. He has disbanded mass
organizations of the working class—the
All-China Federation of Trade Unions
and trade unions of all levels, is brutally
persecuting the leaders, functionaries
and rank and file of the trade unions.
Mao Tse-tung is openly advocating a
reduction of wages. He has abolished
piece-rates and bonuses. He openly calls
for lowering the living standard of the
working class to that of the rural popu-
lation. On the pretext of “the struggle
against counter-revolutionary’ econo-
mism,” he is against improving the life
_ Of factory and office workers, is arresting
and killing all who advocate an im-
provement in the life of factory and of-
fice workers.

Ignoring the difficult living conditions
of the workers, he pursues the so called
“combination of industry, agriculture
and military affairs,” compelling the
workers, in addition to their jobs, to
engage also in agriculture and undergo
military drill. He has sent to each in-
dustrial, mining and transport enter-
prise military units for permanent bil-
leting in order to institute military con-
trol over the workers and other em-
ployees and bring military pressure to
bear on them. Before their shift Starts,
workers and other employees are forced
to recite and sing “quotations” in front
of Mao Tse-tung’s portrait. This is called
“asking Chairman Mao for directives;”
at the end of the shift, they also recite
and sing “quotations”—“report to Chair-
man Mao about their work for the day.”
Military men make use of every free
minute to compel the workers and other

employees “to study Mao Tse-tung’s
thought,” depriving them of an possibi-
lity of resting.

By coercion and deception he forces
part of the workers and other employees
to organize into socalled tsaofans, to
attack the overwhelming majority of the
workers and other employees at fac-
tories, mines and on transport as con-
servatives and reactionaries, to rebel
against them and capture power from
them. This splits the unity of the work-
ing class and causes conflicts in their
ranks.

On many occasions Mao Tse-tung has
falsely proclaimed that “in conditions
of the dictatorship of the proletariat
there are no grounds within the work-
ing class for necessarily splitting into
two irreconcilably hostile camps.” But
the question is asked, who split the
working class into two irreconcilably
hostile camps? Was it not Mao Tse-tung
and his group? The aim pursued by Mao
Tse-tung in splitting the working class
is, on the one hand, to prevent the work-
ing class from being a solidly-knit and
united foremost leading force in China’s
political and social life and, on the other,
to prevent the working class from acting
as a solidly-knit and united force
against the counter-revolutionary mili-
tary coup of Mao Tse-tung.

Recently, under the demagogic —slo-
gans that the “working class must lead
everything” and-“the proletariat must

exercise its dictatorship in the entire
superstructure, including all the spheres
of ideology and culture,” Mao Tse-tung
has forcibly. organized so-called “work-
ers’ brigades for the propaganda of Mao
Tse-tung’s thought.” Actually these are
a kind of detachment of storm troop-
ers who act merely as assistants of mili-
tary units in suppressing the intelligent-
sia, hungweipings and other student
youth; they have nothing in common
either with the “leadership of every-
thing by the working class” or with the
dictatorship of the proletariat. This ven-
ture of Mao Tse-tung is foul mockery of
the ideas of scientific communism about
the leading role of the working class
and the dictatorship of the proletariat.

Though Mao Tseé-tung resorts to vari-
ous methods of blackmail and deception
in an attempt. to rally the working class
under the banner of “Mao Tse-tung’s
thought” to support his reactionary rule,
the facts show that the working class
of China wishes to rally only under the
banner of Marxism-Leninism so as to
fight unitedly against the anti-Marxist
“Mao Tse-tung’s thought” and the anti-
communist, anti-proletarian Mao group.

7. He is persecuting the working pea-
sants and is ruining socialist construc-
tion in the countryside,

Mao Tse-tung is shifting responsibility
for the failure of the people's com-
munes in the countryside onto rural ca-
dres and the peasants. Since 1962, he,
under the guise of the “movement for
socialist education,” has been effecting
brutal persecution of the peasants,
named the “four purges” (that is, “purge
of ideology, purge of politics, purge of
organizations and purge of the econo-
my”).

In the course of the so-called “cultutal
revolution” he has even further stepped
up the endless indignities, arrests and
killing of the cadres and members of
rural people’s communes, has broken up
the Party, Young Communist League
and administrative organizations of the
people's communes, production teams,
and so on.

He, as before, adheres to the erro-
neous division of the middle peasants
into three sections: higher, average and
lower, constantly compelling and pro-
voking the so-called poor and lower
middle peasants to hound the socalled
average and higher middle peasants; he
is wrongly ousting the well-to-do middle
peasants from the middle-peasant ranks
and destroying them as the main repre-
sentatives of capitalism in the country. '

einomstaatces AN OUTSIDE, VIEW, OF THE KILN. AT.THE.HUAHSIN, CEMENT. PLANT,.JN HWANGSHIH,,CENTRAL: CHINA, ....~s-