SSS Pe, ME crn are = en ON I aR: SO =a Se SSC. eS SS OS SE SS — 2a SS SR VPS SE WHITHER NDP? ae NOTE: The following letter hy fen by a member of the NDP oe some of the problems facing DP and labor movement. The inyj 4 ee others to send us their views © points discussed in this letter, as well as on other related topics. We f : 9 dialogue of this kind would a develop the kind of clarity €d today to win united action. A Disappoi s Sic: Ppointed Reader, Van- ia , Writes: From the article cia June 4 issue on the NDP on a convention Pa which I was, would : eis but to believe that tha Iter, William Turner, went what po preconceived ideas of had hie aS going to happen and tee, closed and his ears ee uehout the whole he ‘‘swin i a ce : g to the right 1 ae to Turner) was in en to the left and while acela was” returned by ; Mation, this election in no right oa the party to the 2 ae S right wing policy aCturerc® Japanese auto manu- tip pr a to set.up in B.C. and : Slits from the productivity by ‘~. Workers was condemned ee vention when it Ward b he policy brought for- Manes. the panel on taxation, " ed secondary industry. tablish. paper called for the ned ment of government en worker-controlled Tesolutice » industry. A the Bre but Barrett down in ig es words: ‘“‘The NDP Second €d to foreign control of : ary industry.’ * Party po wing policies of the €ader received another W Was am €n a labor resolution ~ Trad: Nended by convention to . The NDP will gi su DP will give full Peet both within and outside defer ature to workers who the right of free resist e bargaining and who b oiihg forced back to work Barrett hee order.’’ (Something Whit aS not done in the past.) fact He Waffle group was in Que; Ver the leadershi ti oe if Mr. Turner takes ibe before Tead the paper brought nee © group's recent con- Vention’ Just prior to the con- the poy; and compares it with Convent» actually passed by the ha ies even he would be "eSembianen not to see the US to ppd that the Waffle “failed Bien St realistic policies Progres