Review EDITORIAL PAGE Unity always wins Keep this lad out ast week the Civic Non-Part- isan Association (NPA) of Vancouver selected its “slate” of civic candidates, including alder- man Bill Rathie as its mayorality Standard bearer in the coming civic elections. Rathie, one of the most reaction- ary in an assorted job lot of NPA incumbents at City Hall, announc- ed he will run on a “sound busin- ess-like administration” platform, the hardy perennial of years of ‘NPA domination of civic affairs. One of his prime gems of “sound business” was his attempt a few months ago to set up a “free-enter-_ prise” garbage disposal company then move in city council as a “measure of economy” that gar- bage disposal in Vancouver be turned over to this company. Boot- ing out several hundred civic workers (taxpayers) from their jobs didn’t disturb “businesslike” - Rathie one iota. The NPA council was compelled to vote down the motion of their colleague, not on principle grounds of course, but on the “ethical” pretext that aldermen shouldn’t profit from civic enterprises? Closely associated with, and long a recognized pillar of Big Bus- iness, alderman Rathie is bitterly anti-labor and never misses an opportunity to clamor on behalf of his NPA cabal for “strong measures” against organized la- bor. - His virulent opposition to a ward system of aldermanic. re- presentation in Vancouver is also expressive of his contempt for the needs of workingclass ratepayers and his devotion to NPA big bus- iness dictatorship at City Hall. Between now and the civic . elections organized labor and the working people generally have a job to do; to mobilize that degree of unity needed to keep NPA’s Rathie out of the mayor’s chair. Editorial comments . . B i Municipality of Kent bylaw prohibiting the trekking Sons of Freedom Doukhobors from entering the municipality on their way to Aggassiz, passed with the approval of Socred attorney- general Robert Bonnor, is present- ly before the courts having its con- stitutionality tested. ; In this legal hassle to deprive Canadians of the use of public highways by the RCMP, our A-G «~ Stands out like a modern “Dr. .. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde”. _ When first introduced this un- democratic decree had the A-G’s full “approval”. Later, when public indignation began to boil up the, A-G changed his tune and began to “question” its legality. Now he is reported to be outright _ “opposed” to the measure and has become, in the venacular of tte day, “a good guy”? Thus it is exit Mr. Hyde, enter Dr. Jekyll, but that is small com. fort to close to 1,500 Canadians subjected to hunger and the rigors of winter in an open campsite at Hope, while the “powers-that-be” “good guys” and all, contemplate the fate of this sorely oppresed - people. : = * > “s Back in his heyday before the New York Civic Federation took him to their bosom, the late president of the AFL Samuel Gompers declared; “the only way . Pacific T nanecEa tg FO to fight injunctions is to ignore them”. With anti-union injunctions in: B.C. as thick as fleas on a dog, that would seem to be very timely advice, even if a bit “dated’’. * * * ce In the early stages of the U.S. blockade of Cuba a snappy “die now — pay later” promotional sales card outlining the advant- ages of “prepaid” funerals arrived in the mail. No doubt the under- taking monopoly smelled a “kill- ing” from U.S. atomania? oe lesSons stand out crystal clear from the recent Marine Workers’ strike at Allied Engin- eers. One is that with the fine measure of trade union unity ‘mounted by the B.C. Federation of Labor and its affiliates in sup- port of the Marine Workers, the infamous Socred anti-labor legis- lation known as Bills 42-43 can be nullified on every picket line. Given a like unity in building united labor political action through the New Democratic Par- ty, Bills 42-43 and those who sired them can be swept into the politi- cal discard come the next election in B.C. The NDP leadership miss- ed a golden opportunity during the Marine Workers strike to align itself publicly with the BCFL in this highly desirable ob- jective. _ In this strike, as in others, these Bills show up for what, they really are; legislative instruments de- signed to enable the combined forces of government, employers, the courts, massed police (and now: police dogs), to smash effec- tive trade union organization, and ; to. promote organized scabbery and. violence in the process. In essence, the lawless enforcement of “law”, seeking always to put the onus of its violence upon labor, a slander as old as the capitali: system itself. E The Marine Workers Unio (as with others) complied wit all the legal technicalities requil ed under these infamous Bills: gotiations, conciliation, supervis ed strike vote, etc., with strike a tion only as a final resort. Then the bosses (who also 0 the plants) applied to the co for injunctions restricting, Straining, or prohibiting u picketing, while they hire scab man the plant, and the services mass police and dogs to herd th scabs in and out of the strut plant. In B.C. today there approximately 164 court injun tions against union official: and even unspecified union mem bers just blanketed as “Joh Doe”, with the forces of govert- ment and state ready to back these violence-inciting injunctior with lying excuses or police club or both. ; These injunctions and theil results are the evil fruits of Bills 42-43, designed to cripple trad union organizations and make i easy prey for the mounting at tacks of state-monopoly capital 1 its mad drive for substanda wages and spiralling profits. When Socred spokesmen like — deputy labor minister Bill Sands tries to tell organized labor B 42-43 were designed to “support” and “protect” labor, organiz must tell Socred Sands that bl 43 “supports labor much t same way as the hangman’s ro support the victim’, mean building the trade union and unity needed to get rid of si “support” — for good. See =F = ibune © McEWEN - |. Ex Canadian Jewish Weekly ‘Vochenblatt’ recently report- ed a gathering held in Toronto to honor the memory of a group of. courageous’ pioneers who have passed away in recent years. Men and women whose dedicated life’s work has left a priceless heritage to the generations which follow them. - Since the work of those whose memory is so honored was not confined to Toronto alone, but to all Canada, it is fitting that labor papers worthy of the name should also add their meed of tri- - bute to those pioneers whose names are enshrined in the history of Canadian workingclass struggles. In many of the most exploited and ynorganized industries in Canada, and perhaps more es- — pecially in the “sweated” needle trades, these pioneers were tire- less and courageous builders of if today, many of these same unions have been temporarily stripped of their once fighting traditions by burocratic dictum, it is -trade union organization. _ And, | because the matchless ex- . given by these pioneers has also been arbitrarily silenced. Nechama Yanovsky, Freda Shoichet, Bessie Bisgould, Harry Shapiro, David Chudnovsky, B. Zaretsky, these and others like them were the pioneer builders of militant unions, in the shop, in the union hall, on a_ thousand picket lines. They it was whose struggles added greatly to the proud tra- ditions inherent in Canadian unionism; traditions which others of this era, less worthy, boast of —but do little to enhance. But fighting unions were not all that these pioneers built. With great sacrifice, effort and de- votion to their own Jewish people, they built ‘schules’’ where their children and all other young folks could share in the golden treasure of Jewish liter- ature, culture and the arts; for the enrichment of their people and their Canada, _ Class rooms in the Toronto Winchevsky Centre are now to be honored with the names of these pioneers; names not only of humbl> Jewish workers, but of truly great _ Canadians. Names that symbolize the imperishable heart and soul of Canadian labor. ; One of these grand pioneers wc remember with deep love and gratitude, Bessie “Ma” Bisgould. Somewhere in the bible of Gentil> and Jew alike it says something about “I was hungry, and ye gave me to eat”. That was ‘‘Ma” Bis. gould’s life credo. (schools) eo unending duties and her own too often dire poverty, this matchless woman fought hunger tirelessly; not only to provide food for her own large family, but to fill the hungry bellies of countless hun- dreds of R.B. “Iron Heel” Ben: nett’s “Hungry Thirties” victims who came to her door. “Ma” al- ways sent them away, their hunger appeased and their spirits up’ lifted. This writer and his own little family can be added to those count: less hundreds who came. to “Ma’s’ door, and who would have know” the pangs of hunger more often if those days, had it not been for “Ma” Bisgould’s great heart and her seemingly bottomless soup pot It was the parable of the “five loaves and two small fishes’ re~ written in the bitter reality of the class struggle by an indomit: able fighter. Ea Many wondered how managed it. A “miracle”? NO, | “Ma” didn’t believe in miracle: only in people’s unity and struggle and the great heritage it wi someday give to all humanity. In these glorious names b? stowed upon their class rooms, th “kinder”, the students and us patrons of the Toronto WinchevskY Centre have set themselves tl? greatest goal mankind can strive for: the emulation of noble lives: dedicated to the peace, happines> and well-being of all humanity: Dedicated, as Abraham Linc’ — said “to that cause for which *h¢ gave the last full measure of votion”. ample of sacrifice and devotion = em ‘ 5 a In the midst of all her othew oe er { : sa