Can’t manage on $14,000 Carl A. Lgenfritz (left), $70,000-a-year vice-president of U.S. Steel, is seen here talking to Senator Millard Tydings (Dem., Mary- land) after a U.S. Senate committee approved his appointment as $14,000-a-year munitions board chairman. lgenfritz is shaping up because Senate opposition to he will receive his full pay from U.S. Steel while serving on the board. He complains that he can’t live on $14,000 a year. BCER admits charging all traffic will bear ‘Admission that the BCElectric is charging transit rates as high as’ the traffic will bear was made Vice-president of the company. - Mainwaring worded it differently. last week by W. C. Mainwaring, He told a Board of Trade luncheon audience in Hotel Vancouver that many transit companies have raised failes to the point where “further increases would Mean diminished rather than in- creased income.” Then he pulled a long face and announced sadly that the transit business is a “sick industry” and is “suffering from financial anemia.” La “From an earning standpoint, the level of net: earnings (of transit companies) in 1948 was 1.1° per- cent,” said Mainwaring. But the Trade Union Research Bureau here, which has looked in- ~ to the company’s case for a perma- nent fare hoist, reports: “Much of the BCER’s case re- volves around the matter of a ‘fair return’, This was established by the PUC in 1943 at 5.3 percent, - which was arrived at by averaging rates of interest paid by the com- Pany in 1941 on various classes of Capital. These were: bonds, 4% to 614 percent; preferred shares, 6 percent; and common shares, Th Percent. From this was deducted interest on the depreciation re- serve. coe “Since that time the company’s entire funded debt has been re- financed at lowe1! rates of interest. The bonds now average 3.4 per- Cent; the preferred stock is 4.2 percent on the average, and the Common stock pays dividends of 6.4 percent. “On the same formula by which the Public Utilities Commission cal- Culated the ‘fair return’ at 5.3 per- Cent in 1941, it now works out to just over 4 percent as the result of the lower vates of interest. The PUC continues, however, to allow the company 5.3 percent and in 1948 refused to hold a hearing on the fair return. “On total capital of $180: million, ’ the 5.8 percent return obviously al- lows the company about $2,000,000 more than the actual cost of money as indicated by the 4 percent aver- age referred to above. This is con- firmed by the fact that, afte1 pay- ing dividends, the company had ap- proximately $1,000,000 of undistrib- uted profits left over. “In spite of that, the BCER speaks of the need to increase profits up to the 5.3 percent allow- } ed. If it did so, the return to com- es, would amount to roughly $4,000,- 000, or 12% percent.” ® In the face of these figures, the ‘poor mouth” appiioach of BCER’'s vice-president is not likely to im- press the average Vancouver citi- zen. Copper miners seek pay hoist Copper miners in ,B.C. will seek an 18 percent wage increase based upon the present guaranteed wage rate of $9 a day, in forthcoming International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers. ‘ Increases in the cost of living during the past year, plus a re- duction of wages of $1 a shift through bonus losses, makes the demand of 18 percent:a bare mini- mum to bring wages up to decent standards, a Mine-Mill conference held in Britannia decided. If .the wage recommendations are ratified by the union member- ship, locals 349 and 663 will jointly submit the proposals to Granby Consolidated and Britannia Min- ing and Smelting companies on October 2. } mon stock shareholders, after tax-|- negotiations between operators and |. LACK OF PLANNING SCORED Burnaby residents council instal demand incinerator He BURNABY, B.C. Burnaby’s municipal engineer has his mind set on a new dump site which, he assured councillors last week, will last “‘at least a thousand years.” But if residents of the Capitol Hill district have their way he'll have to look elsewhere for a dump site with a more limited capacity because ,no one believes that even Burnaby will still be dumping its garbage into ravines by the year 2949. In fact, the municipal engin- eer’s proposal has touched off a lively demand for installation of a modern incinerator. Last Sunday some 200 residents crowded into Capitol Hill Community Hall at a meeting presided over by J. J. Moodie, chairman of Capitol Hill Ra‘epayers Association, to condemn the engineer's pro- Scant help for jobless By MARK FRANK —OTTAWA Humphrey Mitchell's deputy labor |’ minister, A. A. MacNamara, in an interview, strongly pooh-poohed all suggestions that there was an un- employment crisis developing in the country. Asked for comment on reports of 6,000 jobless in Sorel, Que. and steady talk of unemployment | in key Canadian centers, the minis- ter boastingly remarked, “We're very optimistic. We've never been wrong yet.” Despite the tone of the minister's comments, he earlier noted that the “situation was being very closely watched.” MacNamara said further that no action was being studied by the government on the subject of raising unemployment insur- ance rates or providing for feder- al relief for insured workers whose benefits ran out. No mass public works were being plan- ned to meet continued layoffs, according to the minister. Chief of the unemployment in- surance division, R. G. Barclay, said that the proposal to up relief when insurance ran out was dis- cussed at the last Dominion-Pro- vincial conference, but “blew up,” when the conference collapsed. The proposal then was to provide 85 percent of the amount being | received by the insured person. Beats polio Among the millions of Can- adian and American children who returned to school last week, Barbara Claudio, 11, was one of the. happiest. Fully recovered from a pelio attack, she is seen here leaving the Sister (Kenny In- stitute in Jersey City, N.J., with her mother. HARRY BALL An incinerator would pay its own way. Need labor at UBCM VICTORIA, B.C. The whole atmosphere at the Union of B.C. Municipalities” con- vention here last week was one of conservation and showed the lack of militant labor, farmer and pro- gressive representation at the mun- icipal level. Progressive: motions to allow schoo] teachers to sei've on muni- cipal councils ,and civic employ- ees directly employed by munici- palities to serve on school boards, were defeated. A representative from the B.C. Teachers’ Federation was given a hearing, and tartly ob- served: “You ask us to teach democracy in our schools. Give us the right to practice it.” Delegates tried to 1ush through a resolution calling for a change in the Municipal Act which would make aljl money awards brought down under conciliation after Feb- ruary 15 null and void for that year. A similar resolution was de- feated last year by a‘ mass lobby of civic delegates to Victoria. Ob- viously further mass lobbies will be needed in the future. O. Howell, speaking fo1i the Pro- vincial Association of Fire Fight- ers, made an_ eloquent. appeal against the proposal. Sole response was from Mayor Norah Arnold of Prince Rupert, who admitted that new councils hardly get under way until mid-January, and that per- haps March 15 would be a better date. Attitude of Non-Partisan delegates was to force th:dough the proposal and undercut their own labor code in order to get cheap labor. A motion by Burnaby for in- creased taxation on railway track- age carried, despite a letter of pro- test from the CNR. Burnaby dele- gates pointed out that at present railways can not be taxed for more than $5,280 per mile of main line, and $3,250 for spur lines, regard- less of the value of rails and roaa- bed. The actual cost of laying one mile of rail is $44,000, without roadbed. In the U.S., railways are taxed up to 20 percent of their value fou' this purpose. Reeve Mor- rison emphasized that low taxes paid by Canadian railways are out of proportion.to the value of the posal and voice a unanimous de- mand that Burnaby. council pur- chase an incinerator. Following the. meeting, 300 signatures to a petition were obtained. The proposed new site, rendered necessary because the present dump at Barnet “threatens to°en- croach on the CPR right-of-way,” is a ravine at the foot of Capitol Hill, long recognized as one of Burnaby’s most scenic residential areas, only a-short distance away from the new Westridge housing ‘development. Residents of the area, who have frequently complained to the coun- cil about fumes and smoke from the Shell Oil plant there, declared at Sunday’s meeting that estab- lishment of a dump on land which had supposedly been set aside as a, park site, would create a health menace because of the rats it would attract and a fire hazard, and would lower property values in an area where many new houses have been built. “Councillor J. D. Drummond, who himself lives on Capitol Hill, at- tempted to excuse the council’s proposal with the remark that “the dump has to be in someone’s back yard.” : “Not at all,” declared former councillor Harry Ball. “The coun- cil can, get a modern incinerator.” To Councillor Drummond’s contention that even with an incinerator a dump would still be needed, Ball retorted that a modern incinerator would burn all tin cans and such materials, and that processed garbage could be used for fertilizer, en- abling the incinerator to pay its own way. J. J. Moodie was named chair- man of a committee of ten to present residents’ demands to the council and take whatever other action might become necessary. The proposal has served to focus attention on lack of planning in Burnaby, whose population has doubled over the past few years. A few months ago, while resi- dents of the Vancouver Heights district were picketing BCElectric transmission line towers along Boundary Road which Burnaby council ineffectually protested, the council proposed to throw land north of Edinburgh street open to industrial development. Only prompt action by aroused resi- dents, who organized protest pe- titions and sent delegations to the council, scotched this recommend- ation and obtained the land for park development. Now, at Capi- tol Hill, a park reserve is proposed as a garbage dump. Manitoba election probable in October WINNIPEG A provincial election in Mani- toba is regarded here as a certain- ty for October. Official date has not yet been set but it is believed it will be either October 17 or 24. Contrary to rumor, the Liberal-_ Tory Coalition government will not break up before the voting takes place and will campaign as a Coalition despite big cracks in its ranks. The CCF is now the official opposition. The LPP has one mem- ber, W. A. Kardash. A Coalition caucus on August 29 gave Premie1i Campbell authority land adjacent. to set the date for the election. PACIFIC TRIBUNE — SEPTEMBER 16, 1949 — PAGE 7