FRIDAY, JULY 18, 1969 Three ‘unities’ needed BIG CONTRACTORS DECLARE WAR ON BUILDIN I ee much-bombed Port of Haiphong, Democratic Republic of Vietnam, big Soviet Ps unloading food, medicines and other goods to the people of Vietnam. Photo sh Cargo, os old friends, boatswain of the Soviet ship ‘PULA’ from Odessa and Vietnamese 8shoreman Chan Gui Chuk warmly greeting each other prepatory to unloading U.S.-Canada joint effort to end the war in Vietnam peat eon should Americans Canadian = in Viet <8 pane to end the ay e Was the theme of a two- sr eacrence of some 250 U.S. anadian people who laateted at Totem Park, U.B.C. soso Sponsored by the ae Women, who were also isti Sible for bringing three Nguished Vietnamese Ric Canada this month, ence was a lively and Ovin ined gathering of peace- the © Citizens on both sides of 3 Rc Madames Vo Thi Thi’ 8uyen Ngoc Dung, and Le Were and their interpreters Quiet] Pecial guests who listened Quest, and answered many a ns when the need arose. the = California, Oregon and dele ate of Washington, the U.S. q cation comprised young and ’ Students and parents, while e the Canadian participants included university professors, concerned women and some young people. The conference suffered an almost total blackout from local press and T.V. which gives weight to the supposition that the powers-that-be are terrified of joint action for peace on the part of U.S.-Canadian people. Here, for for the first time, representatives of a cruelly beseiged country gathered with representatives of the aggressor country with only one thing in mind — to put an end to the bloody haulocaust. On the second day of the conference, the delegates of the two countries split into separate groups to discuss tactics. “We must get across to the Canadian people that there is a direct relation between the high cost of living in Canada and the war in Viet Nam,” said one speaker. ‘“‘When prices rise in ~ the U.S. it is inevitably reflected in our cost of living.”’ At the U.S. session, speakers stressed that a reason for the repressive moves against labor, students and peace forces was that the military-industrial complex well know that a cessation of the war would bring nothing but unemployment for returning soldiers. “The young men who are dying in Viet Nam are the sons of the working class, and that is being understood by growing numbers of trade unionists, and we see them in the struggle to stop the war.”’ When asked if recognition of the provisional revolutionary government was of utmost importance, Madame Ngoc See CONFERENCE, Pg. 7 Tribune VOL. 30. NO. 29 By OBSERVER There is a new employer’s organization in British Columbia, the Construction’ Labor Relations Association (C.L.R.). According to all indications, R. K. Gervin, ex- R.C.M.P., ex-Trades Council Secretary, ex-Non-Partisan alderman and an_ influential member of the Liberal Party will be Mr. Big on _ the operational side. As reported in the May 26 issue of the Journal of Commerce, C.L.R. was officially born on April 21 and has five primary objectives: 1. Negotiating contracts with unions; 2. Preparation and _ presen- tation of briefs to all levels of government; 3. Interpreting existing agreements and giving advice to members; 4. Collecting, collating and disseminating information and statistics; 5. Initiating and maintaining liaison with other industries and employer groups. The minutes of the founding meeting describe the long-range objective in the following terms: “The secondary objective is to create the environment for a single, provincial agreement covering all trades and employers within the construction industry being multi-union and multi com pany.” Examined in the abstract, this long-term goal may seem to be in the best interest of construction workers. But life is made up of reality, not abstractions. For example, there is nothing abstract about the sharp class divisions between construction workers and the major contractors. Neither is there anything abstract about the divisions between the smaller contractors and those who are most closely linked to monopoly capital. C.L.R. represents an attempt by monopoly capital to create a solid, united front of big business against the construction union— and to whip the smaller firms into line. This makes _ it necessary for the unions to reassess their bargaining methods, and to achieve a higher degree of co-ordination and unity. On the union side there are 17 10¢ G TRADES internationals with jurisdiction in 54 trades. With two exceptions, the unions have from two to 46 locals in the province, based on craft or geographic divisions. Negotiations in many cases have been conducted’ by individual locals, with little or no reference to other neighboring locals in their crafts, or to other internationals. In some cases, like the Carpenters and Ironworkers, negotiations have been conducted on a provincial basis, but here, too, with insufficient co-ordination with the building trades as a whole. The emergence of C.L.R. opens a new chapter. Despite serious divisions within their own ranks, the unions have been able to take advantage of the divisions on the employers’ side, in their struggle to win higher pay, a shorter work week and improved fringe benefits. Now, with a tightly-knit organization in mind, closely linked to the top circles of big business, and with the blessing of the Socred government, the major contractors can be expected to emulate the big oil corporations, the supermarket chains and the B.C. Telephone Company in the current strikes and lockouts. Two encouraging develop- ments in recent years were the establishment of the Provincial Council of Carpenters and the Provincial Building Trades Council. The Carpenters’ Council negotiates on a province-wide basis, representing some 8,000 members in construction. The Provincial Building Trades, established in 1967, has laid the basis for the co- ordination and unity in negotiations of all unions in the construction industry. Recently, the Provincial Building Trades Council adopted a program of organizing the unorganized and improving camp conditions. They are now trying to take over control of the hydro projects from the Allied Hydro Council. The Hydro Council became notorious for its 10-year no-strike contracts, negotiated between top level international officers and top level contractors. without participation by the member ship. See CONTRACTORS, Pg. 8 ° A Ne Rac ES