THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM ( 0 UJ | C 1 OCT 20 1975 MAYOR AND COUNCIL OCTOBER 15, 1975 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITTEE Re: Industrial Use to the South Side of McLean Avenue The question of best land use to the south side of McLean Avenue has been studied in great depth by the Planning and Zoning Committee and the Commictee has the follewing to report. The Committee, however, wishes to first point out that this report is not intended as a recommendation. It is presented to Council for ‘discussion and input from other Council members. After having examined all possible alternatives, the Committee arrived at the opinion that it is desirable to include the two City blocks bounded by McLean, Ryan, Marshall & Taylor for industrial use with M-3 zoning as the guidaline. A suitable buffer is to be established, preferably using the existing 66-foot Marshall Avenue road allowance with possible extension into the block to the west of Brown. Avenue in the form of either a road allowance or a buffer zone, when development proposais on these lands are presented to the City. It is recognized that the closure of Marshall would result in the need to provide development alternatives for the block immediately south of Marshall Avenue, and the Planning Department has prepared a replotting scheme on which an agreement is being sought from the property owners affected. ‘ Some of the major points based on which the Committee arrived at its opinion are as follows: 1. The north side of McLean Avenue is presently zoned M-1 and largely developed under the old zoning regulations, whereby no buffer or suitable landscaped yard fronting on McLean is provided. To locate houses immediately on the south side under this condition is clearly unacceptable. The possibility of using the lane way as the industrial boundary as shown in the old Industrial Development Brochure has also been explored, and the conclusion is that a mere 20 foot lane as a buffer is far from being satisfactory. The general area south of McLean and east of Taylor is virtually undeveloped and presently zoned RS-2. Although RS-2 zoning normaliy indicates possible transition to RS-1 residential use, it is by no means a commitment to that use. If another use can be justified as more desirable, it is the City's policy to -give due consideration. With the above in mind, it appears that the subject area offers a good opportunity for re-establishing a more suitable industrial boundary whereby a substantial buffer can be established to assure a more livable: environment for the future residents. Furthermore, the fact that the subject area is undeveloped results in only a handful of residences significantly affected by the proposed land use change.