ce 7: i Fryer’s stand casts doubt on support to AUCE strike **John Fryer, general secretary of the B.C. Government Employees Union, has announced that because of a recent B.C. Supreme Court in- junction, the union has been forced to withdraw its active daily support from striking Simon Fraser Univer- sity workers.”” That opening paragraph in an April 2 news release: from Fryer’s office momentarily surprised a number of active members of Local 2 of the Association of University and College Employees on strike at Simon Fraser University. AUCE Local 2, representing 650 library and clerical workers at the university, launched a_ full-scale strike on March 15. This followed almost one year of fruitless negotia- tions and a number of partial strikes. As reported in the Tribune March 16, the 43,000-member B.C. Government Employees’ Union im- mediately pledged its support to AUCE, donated $20,000 to the Local 2 strike fund and offered other assistance, including the ser- vices ofa full-time media co- ordinator. Then came the picket line demonstration of March 22, on a road leading to the university grounds. According to a friend who was there, John Fryer, one of the speakers at a support demonstra- tion, said the strike would go on forever ‘‘unless we do something about it.’’ After he stepped down, he went out to the middle of the road and was followed by men and women who had gathered to show their support for the strikers. Fryer marched back and forth across the road for a few minutes and then left to attend to other business, but the picket line con- tinued to march across the road, in the hope that vehicles would turn away and that this would help win the strike. Most of the vehicles were private cars, carrying students on their way to classes. Later in the day, the RCMP moved in and physically removed the picket line from the road, arresting 18 picketers in the process. The university administration then applied for a court injunction | Fed urges mediation The secretary of the B.C. Federa- tion of Labor last week called for “thigh level mediation”’ to end the strike-lockout at University. Federation secretary Dave Macintyre issued the call Wednes- day following a meeting with the Association of University and Col- lege Employees, Local 2. © “It’s time that both parties entered into high level mediation in order to find a solution to the dispute,’’ he said. Board rules on dummy boss In a precedent-setting decision, the Labor Relations Board has rul- ed that Whistler Vale Holdings and R. J. McArthur Construction Ltd. must pay some $58,000 in back wages to Carpenters’ Union members. Making use of a practice which unionists have charged is wide- spread in the construction industry, the companies had set up a third company in a bid to circumvent the union agreement. to limit the number of pickets. They - argued before Justice Victor Dryer that the picket line constituted a nuisance and intimidation, violated the Motor Vehicle Act and Highways Act and prevented access to and from the campus. The Vancouver Express of Wednesday, March 28, in reporting on the court hearing, quoted an AUCE spokesperson as follows: ‘Union co-ordinator Joan Woed-: ward testified Tuesday that AUCE did not organize last Thursday’s LABOR COMMENT BY JACK PHILLIPS Simon Fraser. rally, nor did the union invite B.C. Government Employees’ Union leader John Fryer who led_ the pickets across the intersection. Wood said the rally was organized by the student strike support com- mittee.’’ Another paragraph in that news report is most revealing: ‘‘AUCE lawyer Leo McGrady argued that the union executive never encourag- ed or-condoned illegal activity by its members.”’ When I read those statements, I knew that an injunction restricting the number of pickets was a. foregone conclusion. As it transpired, a court order was issued on Thursday, March 29, limiting the number of pickets to ten, and prohibiting anyone with knowledge of the injunction from assisting or counselling the AUCE Local 2, in regard to picket activity. Immediately after the police ac- tion against the picket line, Fryer became the target of sharp criticism from both the provincial govern- ment and from the leader of the op- position. _Labor minister Allan Williams said Fryer showed ‘‘ex- tremely bad judgment from a labor. leader in this province who, I’m sure, would be the first to object if anyone were to interfere with any of his industrial relations problems.”’ The same Colonist report stated that NDP leader Dave Barrett, dur- ing the taping of the TV show Capital Comment, said he thought Fryer’s statement ‘‘foolish.’’ But, he added, ‘‘foolish actions are not— confined to trade union leaders.” While condemning Fryer for ac- ting in a fashion he described as “*foolish’’, Barrett did not give any words of encouragement or support to the strikers in this bitter struggle for a fair and reasonable contract settlement. The Vancouver Express of March 28 quoted Fryer as follows: “I have no regrets about en- couraging setting up a proper picket line. “The idea is to let people know there’s a proper picket line up there and that anyone who wishes to _cross it is a scab. And that the trade union movement doesn’t like scabs.’ : Fryer also said in that interview that he would continue to make \regular visits to the AUCE picket line on a daily basis. He appeared on the picket line, on Monday, March 26, four days after the removal of the mass picket line “across the road, along with a group of BCGEU members. Next day, March 27, Fryer made some additional statements to the Victoria Colonist. For example: “He said at first that he didn’t want to get dragged into a public dispute with Barrett, who had disagreed with the blocking of the PACIFIC TRIBUNE—APRIL 13, 1979—Page 12 road ‘by pickets. The move, which led to the arrests, was made after Fryer addressed the crowd. But: Fryer was quick to point out that he had more knowledge of the situa- tion than the NDP leader.’’ Fryer was then quoted directly: “‘T was there and I saw what was go- ing on. I have been in the trade union movement long enough to know that when a trade union picket line is being flagrantly violated you have to beef up that picket line.”’ ; He added: ‘‘The picket line is a tradition in B.C. that must be defended.’ Fryer then hit out at his citics, in-. cluding politicians, for not understanding what was at stake: ‘And all of a sudden we get this self-righteous claptrap from politi- cians.’’ When he was pressed to answer whether he was including Barrett in his criticism, he replied: ‘*T said political leaders.”’ It is understandable that AUCE strikers expected that John Fryer would, after taking stock of the dif- ficult situation created by the in- junction, devise new means of help- ing to win the strike.’ Instead of help, there was the press release of April 2, referred to above, a melancholy document if I _ ever saw one. The third paragraph, declared, in effect, that the strike is lost: ‘“The effect and relatively resourceless union will severely restrict its ability to bring the dispute to a successful conclusion,’’ Fryer said. ““The ex- parte nature of the injunction also effectively removes the possibility of AUCE receiving outside help from the labor movement.”’ ~— The fourth paragraph contained’ this gem: ‘‘Quite apart from the economic needs of AUCE members is the question of whether or not a small union, with limited member- ship and funds can receive the same: benefits from a collective bargain- ing system that larger and more powerful unions do. The scales have. now been tipped by a legal maneuver in favor of a powerful employer against a small group of working people. When this happens the collective bargaining system is effectively rendered unworkable.’’ What reads like a final goodbye was contained in these words: “The BCGEU offers no apology for its attempt to help a smaller and weaker union in its fight for what, in reality is its survival against an employer that has the combined weight of the governments and courts on its side and, although we have been effectively blocked from offering further assistance, we are urging AUCE to continue their legal picket line until they win a de- ‘cent contract.’’ If I was an AUCE striker, I would be tempted to say ‘‘thanks for nothing, John.”’ However, some one should fe- mind John Fryer about one aspect of the history of the Canadian labor © movement. Neither unjust labor laws nor court injunctions have prevented the growth of that move- ment. No matter how difficult the situation confronting a particular union at a given time, the labor Movement as a whole can always find the forms of active solidarity best suited to help the workers who are in difficulty, provided the pro- — per leadership is given. I would sug- gest that John Fryer, as leader of the second largest union in the pro- vince, and as an officer of the B.C. Federation of Labor should address himself to this problem. It is possi- ble to bring this strike to a suc- cessful conclusion provided that AUCE is not left on its own with no- support from the rest of organized: labor. JOHN FRYER. . questioned. ota in AUCE sits at Simon Frise” Unive — Sean Griffin photo Ul overpayment appe set by referees nail The Unemployment Insurance Commission board of referees has set April 20 as the date for the next appeal in the contentious UIC over- payment issue — although trade unionists preparing the appeal still have no assurances that the hearing room will be large enough to hols . all the appellants. The board called the hearing for the government office complex at 4285 Canada Way, rejecting an earlier offer from the United Fishermen and Allied Workers’ Union to use the union hall for the hearing to ensure that the 115 ap- pellants as well as witnesses and legal counsel would be able to at- tend. The UIC had earlier rejected pro- tests from the Vancouver and District Labor Council that UIC referees board chairman R. K. Ger- vin had acted arbitrarily in hearing the first appeals, involving non- union claimants. To. be heard April 20 is -a representative appeal on behalf of some 115 members of various unions including the UFAWU, the Carpenters, the ‘Internati Woodworkers and the. Hospi Employees Union. All face repayment of UIC o payments supposedly paid to thi in 1977 when a computer error the regional unemployment fr higher than the rate official byf Statistics Canada. ~ Lawyers for the appellants arguing that the money should 1 have to-be paid back, submit that the ‘‘national unemployment and the rele regional rate were such to warr: the payment of_such benefits.’” Even if there may have been an overpayment, they have added would be ‘‘an appropriate time” write it off, considering economic hardship repayment past benefits would cause. A further appeal to the. umpire | may also be pursued if the appeal to the referees board is unsuccessful. rate of Unionists in Nova Scotia: are ex: | pected to pursue their appeal on same issue of overpayments to- federal appeals court. The umpire rejected earlier spp iar 29. NDP spokesman Ernie Hall and Communist Party labor. secretary Jack Phillips will be among the speakers at Vancouver’s annual May Day celebration. The Vancouver Trade Union May Day Committee; organizers of the annual event, announced this week that the May Day concert -meeting has been set for Sunday, April 29 at 7:30: p.m. in the Templeton School Auditorium, 727 Templeton Dr., Vancouver. In addition to Hall, NDP provin- cial candidate in Surrey, and Phillips, CP federal: candidate. in Vancouver Kingsway, the meeting will hear a zeparsenire of the _time, 7:30 p.m. rather than the 2; years, and that child care will be ‘provided at the meeting. May Day Rally April 28 B.C. Federation of Labor and the CUT of Chile. Vancouver Labo _ Council secretary treasurer Pai Neale will chair the meeting and musical program will include T Hawken and Steve Gidora _ Spare Change. Proceeds from the meeting be donated to the Sudbury IN strikers and for humanitarian aid Mp Vietnam. The committee has asked su porters to take note of the differen p.m. afternoon time of previous PA iF IC FRiBbUNE ATARI ® ryiddrase 238 oc8. ches Siete City OF tOWN 22isee se cece Postal Code ESN mrs AoE sod the paper that fi fee for labor 1 am enclosing: 1 year $101] 2 years $18[ ] 6 months $6[ ] Old{ ] New[] Foreign 1 year $12 [ 7 Donation $. ee