‘ Units of the socialist countries which Cises. The presence of Soviet military Contingents was presented by anti- Socialist and Right-wing forces as the Qccupation of Czechoslovak territory. Does this suggest respect for allied _ Commitments under the Warsaw _ Treaty? No. This rather indicates a Wish to interfere with the practical ~ functioning of the military machin- _ @ry of the Warsaw Treaty Organiza- tion. A party which reckons with adopted allied commitments cannot be- have in this fashion. Only a party "which ignores these commitments can Conduct itself so. The Warsaw Treaty "=~Mmembers could not but draw the ap- is, | Propriate conclusions from this. | Recently there has been an obvious upsurge of anti-Soviet propaganda and | anti-Soviet pronouncements in. Czecho- | Slovakia. One may recall the provo- | Cative May 2 Staro Miasto assemblage "> where some speakers made anti-Soviet ' Statements. One may recall the ‘insult- ing utterances of Prochazka, Hanzelka and .several: other people like them. One may recall the many pronounce- __ ™Ments:made through mass media whose ~ authors did their best to besmirch the amicable Soviet-Czechoslovak _ rela- tions. In recent years it has-been a rare. thing to have even heard from Czechoslovakia. The enemies pounced On every pretext, whether the Sejna affair, the speculation around the cir cumstances attending the death of Jan Masaryk or the exercises of the War- Saw Treaty armies, to add fuel to the _ fire of anti-Soviet moves. There were ‘Cases of anti-Soviet leaflets circulated -in cities and towns, and affronts were ' ~ put on the Soviet flag. Naturally such acts could not lead to an improvement in our relations. ’ In whose interests was it to sow the Seeds of animosity towards the USSR? Only in the interests of those who seek to expunge from the memories of the Czechoslovak people -the struggle we had -waged together against Hitlerism, Of those who.do not cherish the social- ist gains of, the Czech and Slovak peo- _Bles, of those who wish to abolish the Bains of world socialism. As has al- Ways been the case, anti-Sovietism - Joins: hands with anti-communism, the two complementing one another. The leaders of the Czechoslovak So- Cialist Republic have made many state- ments about the unshakable Czechoslo- _ Wak-Soviet friendship. At the May Plenary Meeting of the Central Com- Mittee of. the Communist Party of 4 Czechoslovakia, voices. were raised in _ Sincere alarm over the state of our re- lations. No effective measures were taken, however, against the bourgeois nationalistic wave, against anti-Soviet Activities in Czechoslovakia. One can, Of course be eloquent about friend- “Ship, solidarity and loyalty to allied n- é 3 : ; 1d Obligations;. important though is not of What is said, but what is meant, what of oncrete actions are taken following Neclarations. a: There is not the shadow of a doubt ts. Sa at masterminds of the anti-Soviet ampaign will fail to obliterate the 1d : of Axiom that Czechoslovakia can pre- = Serve its independence and sovereignty s. _ Only as a socialist state, as a member iq... WF _the socialist community. re In Striving to undermine Czechoslo- Ly akia’s relations with the USSR and na he other socialist countries, the reac- _ fionary forces were prepared to lead e. _— the Czechoslovak people into a state _ Of bondage under the yoke of im- kK. erialism. reo Of. vil es n = Of late there have appeared in Cze- t. 9s choslovakia and begun to operate ener- NS Betically counter-revolutionary anti- ty ocialist organizations with a definite ~ social basis relying on foreign sup- w _ Bort which more and more frankly laid * Slaims to power. There has in effect le ome into existence in the country a ts political opposition aimed to effect a _ fapitalist restoration there. Ww ee Throughout the past 20 years there ) _ have existed in Czechoslovakia non- _ Communist Parties which were part of “the National Front. Their ‘ leaders socialist construc- had been moved in for the staff exer-_ ntfibiited By their activity? Tons ERS to enlisting non-communist forces in In the past seven months, however, the policies of these parties have funda- mentally changed. The leadership of the People’s and Socialist Parties have radically altered their policy and, though they still covered up their ac- tions with slogans of cooperation with the Communist Party within the frame- work of the National Front, have in effect gone towards the establishment of a legal opposition. In their provi- sional program documents the leaders of these two non-Communist Parties have laid claims to equal representa- tion with the Communist Party in the exercise of power. This took place in spring. By July no one made any at- temt to hide the fact that the real aim was to oust the Communist Party from power and set up a new non-commu- nist national leadership. The role that the Czechoslovak So- cial Democratic Party played in the past is more or less a matter of com- mon knowledge. By cleaving working class ranks, the Right-wing leadership of this Party vigorously supported re- action in its struggle against Commu- nists and served as a reliable buttress of the bourgeois regime. In 1948 when the honest revolution- ary elements of the Social Democratic ‘Party: joined forces with the Commu- nists, this Party ceased to exist. This year, however, though the National Front and Central Committee of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia _had decided to ban the Social Demo- cratic Party, the process of reviving the Party was actually started. Widely circulated in Prague on June 12 was a document bearing the title: “Position of the City Preparatory Com- mittee of the Czechoslovak Social De- mocratic Party with Respect to the Present Political Situation.” This docu- ment stated that after a 20-year break the Social Democratic Party was re- turning to the political scene and claimed that the Party had never ceas- ed to exist either juridically or as “an expression of a definite concrete poli- tical concept.” The June 1948 merger with the Communist Party of Czecho- slovakia was proclaimed “‘invalid.’) On June 21 the Preparatory Commit- tee of the Czechoslovak Social Demo- cratic Party led a meeting in Prague in which Social Democrats from some of the regions of Bohemia and Moravia were represented. After that meeting regional and district committees and hundreds of. local organizations of the Social Democratic Party were formed. The Party began to act, moreover, against the Communist Party of Cze: choslovakia. In the past seven months numerous diverse groups and organizations of an anti-socialist hue have appeared in Czechoslovakia. These organizations claimed to act as centres of opposition and made less and less attempt to hide the fact that their aim was to abolish the socialist system. A frankly counter-revolutionary or- ganization was the “Club-231’ cur- rently headed by such men as the old _ fascist Brodsky, the former bourgeois General Palecek, imperialist secret ser- vice agents. Rambausek and Czech who earlier received sentences for espion- age, and others, all hard-bitten vicious enemies of socialism. Another patently anti-socialist or- ganization which was exceptionally ac- tive and sought to attract to its mem- bership intellectuals, factory work- ers and servicemen was the “Club of Non-Party Activists,” whose ideolo- gical leader was Ivan Svitak, an ex- pelled member of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia. He worked out the strategy and tactics of this or- ganization and in a wordy statement published in the magazine Reporter painted a full picture of the stage-by- stage ouster of the Communists from power and of the advent to power of anti-Communists through an emergen- cy parliamentary Election. The “Club-231” and “Club of Non- Party Activists” were far from being the only organizations with an anti- ' socialist tendency, and they did active work. 2 The. anti-socialist Chechibstovakia Mainta at es the country for constructive pursuits. . saa est contacts with centres of ‘counter- revolutionary emigrants, bourgeois par- ties and quarters abroad. The leaders of the Czechoslovak So- cialist Republic declared that legal ac- tion would be taken against the oppo- sition organizations. But no _ such action was taken. The gravity of the situation prevail- ing in the country and the need for urgent action to cut short the activities of hostile forces were particularly clearly demonstrated by the publica- tion and extensive popularization of that frankly counter-revolutionary plat- form, the “Two Thousand Words” ap- peal. This document which is directly aimed against the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia contains an _ outright call for struggle against the constitu- tional authority. It was extensively drawn upon to unite all with a grudge against the socialist system, to whom the document presented a program for action. One cannot fail to note that the authors of this anti-socialist platform threatened to use armed force to up- hold their positions. The outright ac- tion of these elements in the form of the “Two Thousand Words” appeal provided every reason for taking deci- sive measures against them with the backing of the party and working-class fodces. But no action followed that could be considered a rebuff ‘to the counter-revolutionary forces. This opened the way for other simi- lar actions, and they were not long in coming. Developments in the last few weeks and days show that reaction and anti-socialist organizations have intensified subversive activities against the Communist Party and the people’s power. Persecution of honest Commu- nists devoted to socialism has become still more open and unbridled. Under the slogan of “removing con- servatives from bodies of state power,” demands were more and more vigor- ously made for early elections to the National Assembly. Representatives of Right-wing organizations strove to en- sure the defeat of the Communist Party at these elections. In other words, this meant an outright attempt to stage a counter-revolutionary coup. Though counter-revolution sought to achieve a quiet takeover without an armed conflict, it anticipated other possibilities. It is a known fact that secret arms caches have been dis- covered; this shows that the forces of reaction did not rule out an armed con- flict with the supporters of socialism. An association of officers of the erst- while Benes army known as the “asso- ciation of servicemen abroad” was formed. On the other side of Czechoslo- vakia’s borders, in close proximity to them, large groups of counter-revolu- tionaries moved up and joined forces some of which were armed and infil- trated Czechoslovakia. At a Prague University social gathering Svitak bluntly announced that for the sake of establishing the principle of democra- tization and attaining “absolute free- dom” it was possible that the country might choose to fight a civil war. VIE As a result of the activities of Right- wing anti-socialist and counter-revo- lutionary forces in Czechoslovakia, the tangible threat loomed of a counter- “revolutionary coup and the loss of the gains of socialism. This was precisely the main cause of anxiety which the CPSU and other fraternal parries have shown over the political developments taking place in Czechoslovakia. It is well known that the Central Committees of the Bulgarian Commu- nist Party, the Hungarian Socialist Workers’ Party, the Socialist Unity Party of Germany, the Polish United Workers’ Party, and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union did all they could as friends to help the Commu- nist Party and peoples of Czechoslo- vakia to overcome the dangerous crisis and by political means to inflict a de- feat upon the forces of mounting coun- ter-revolution. é Following the May meetings in Mos- cow of the representatives of the CPSU and the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia; the CPSU Central- Cottinittted GeGeamdly proposes fnew! wit oni £2 even flirting with theeforcesvof coun: bilateral meeting with the Czechoslo- vak Communist Party leadership in order to discuss the current situation. But each time the leaders of the Cen- tral Committee of the Cemmunist Party of Czechoslovakia dodged the issue by citing various reasons. Loyal to the principles of interna- tionalism and moved by the solidarity with fraternal Czechoslovakia and res- ponsibility for the destiny of socialism On our continent, the leaders of a num- ber of fraternal Warsaw Treaty mem- . ber-states decided to get together with the leaders of the Czechoslovak Social- ist Republic in order to have a com- radely discussion of the current situa- tion, to sketch a way out of the situ- ation and to offer assistance. Unfortu- nately, the leaders of the Central Com- mittee of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia rejected this proposal and did not wish to meet in Warsaw. The situation was such, however, that the fraternal parties were fully justi- fied, politically and morally, in holding such a meeting. The Warsaw Meeting demonstrated the full unity of the five Communist and Workers’ Parties, their unshakable cohesion and resolve to rebuff the ma- chinations of counter-revolutionary forces. An analysis of the counter-revolu- tionary anti-socialist activities that took place in Czechoslovakia conclu- sively demonstrates that they were not at all spontaneous but well organized. They distinctly revealed the times of action, the directions and the targets of the attacks by anti-socialist forces, the definite sequence of their actions and the coordination of the activities of all forces, that is the Right-wing re- visionist forces inside the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia, the anti- socialist forces, the frankly counter- revolutionary forces inside the country and the external forces supporting them. All this goes to show that the events were masterminded by organized counter-revolutionary forces with broad connections inside the country, which directed the activities of anti- socialist forces in the mass media and maintained links with various clubs and other parties. The counter-revolu- - tionary forces struck also at the key organs of state defense. The people who carried out counter-revolutionary aims had connnections with foreign secret services and imperialist quarters abroad. True, some of the organizers of the counter-revolutionary forces en- deavored till recently to kecp, in the shadow. The Right-wing forces had their own men in the steering bodies of the Communist Party of Czechoslo- vakia and were well informed of their actions. This increased the danger of the events taking place and called for decisive action by the entire Party against counter-revolution, and above all for vigorous action: by the Presi- dium of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia and its every member as well as the members of the government of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic. Mean- while, some members of the Presidium of the Central Committee of the Com- munist Party of Czechoslovakia and government members often came out to oppose the line which the Presidium of the Central Committee of the Com- munist Party of Czechoslovakia had charted on matters of principle. Thus F. Krigel, a member of the Presidium of the Central Committee of the Com- munist Party of Czechoslovakia, far from rebuffing anti-socialist elements, in effect voiced solidarity with those who committed outright counter-revo- lutionary actions, for example, in his TV interview with the authors of the “Two Thousand Words” appeal. The CPSU and other fraternal par- ties of the socialist countries repeated- ly called the attention of the Czecho- _ Slovak Communist Party leadership to this. Our own experience and the ex- perience of political struggle accumu- lated by the other fraternal parties and socialist countries teach us that one cannot turn one’s back and shut one’s eyes to the danger of counter-revolu- tion. A conciliatoty approach, the de- liberate -belittling of the danger and = VA GRE OL si ; SEPTE