Communist Party writes Israeli warlords victimizing citizens Evidence of growing distain for the demo- cratic rights of its citizens is provided by the Israeli government’s actions against anti-war forces in the country. Recent examples of punitive actions against Israeli citizens is brought to light by the Com- munist Party of Israel, in a letter to Canadian Commuists. The letter charges that Israeli ruling circles fear the peace forces of the country, who op- pose Israeli aggression against its neighbors. Members of ‘the Communist Party which. unites Arabs and Jews in its ranks are subjected to particular restrictions. The letter is headed: Appeal for Action and Solidarity in Defense of the Persecuted Israeli Partisans of Peace, Struggling Against the Policy of Aggression and Annexation. : Slightly abridged, the letter reads: With the growing alienation of wider circles from the official Israeli policy, the Govern- ment is intensifying its encroachment on de- mocracy and attempting, through various means to silence and impede the struggle of the progressive forces in the country. Among the conspicuous victims of this hys- teric onslaught on democracy are the anti-war partisans of peace, who have been deprived of basic tenets of the charter of Human Rights, endorsed by the states of the world including Israel. These are the scores of Israeli citizens who suffer the limitation of the Compulsory Residence restrictions issued against them by the military authorities under the infamous British Mandatory Emergency. regulations, which Israeli governments have continually kept in force despite popular opposition. The list of these Israeli citizens who are “holders” of compulsory residence orders—i.e. orders limiting their residence to their towns and villages—includes leading cadres and activ- ists of the Communist Party of Israel and pro- gressives opposed to the aggressive policy of the Government. Elected by the Public They include members of the Political Bu- reau of the CP of Israel Emile Touma (restric- ted to Haifa) and Salim El-Kassem (restricted to Nazareth), members of the Secretariat of CPI Saliba Khamis and Zahi Karkabi. (restrict- ed to Nazareth and to Haifa), all the other Arab members of the Central Committee of the CPI and the leading cadre of the Party dis- tricts and branches. Some of these hold public elective positions such as Salim El-Kassem, Jamal Moussa (of Acre) and Othman Abu-Ras (of Taibe) who are members of the Executive Council of the His- tadrut (General Trade Union Federation). Others include municipal and local councils members, such as Mun’em Jarjura, member of the Nazareth municipal council, Ramzi Khou- ry, member of the Acre municipal council; Sha- fiq Khoureya, member of the Shafa A’mer mu- nicipality, Raji El-Najame, member of the local council of Aibeleen, Ahmad Nasrallah, mem- ber of the local council of Um El-Fahm, Abdel Hamid Abu-Aita, member of the council in Taibe, Nassim Abu-Khaet, member of the council in Tira; Lawyer Mohamed El-Haj, member of the local council of Kufr Yassef and- poet Naif Salim, member of the local council of Pkea’s. The latter has been further restricted by a house arrest order which means that he has to stay indoors from sunset to sunrise. Further, the editors of the Communist Party press such as CC member, Ali Ashour deputy . chief editor of the Arabic party organ AlI-It- tihad, A’issam El-Abbassi, Ibrahim Mougraby and Jameel Shehadeh have all -been restricted to their towns, the first two in Haifa and the latter two in the village of Kufr Yassef. So has been restricted to Nazareth the administrator of Al-Ittihad Yousef Sabbagh. Non-Communists Victimized Too The Arab leaders of the Young Communist League of Israel—Nimer Murkos, Omar Saa’di and Wajeh Sema’n, together with other mem- bers of the YCL Central Committee and edi- tors of the YCL organ in Arabic Al-Ghad, poet Salem Jubran and Nabil Aiwedah, have all been restricted. Among the,non-party progressives, thus vic- timized, are lawyers such as Mohamed Mel’ari of Haifa, and Husni Airaki of Tira, teachers such as Hassan Bishara teaching in the second- ary school of Taibe and Rushdi Khaskeh teach- ing in the secondary school of Jaffa, and uni- versity students such as Darwish Kashova’ who is not allowed to pursue his studies by being restricted to Tira. : The choice of Arab communists as the ob- ject of greater discriminatory and oppressive measures is a gross anti-communist onslaught designed to achieve two objectives. a) To limit the political activity of the Com- munist Party—the consistent militant fighter against the government policy of aggression and expansion. b) To sow suspicions among the Israeli pub- lic, which is being subjected to an intensive process of brain-washing with chauvinist na- tional sentiment, as to the patriotism of the Communist Party and its international policy. A coarse example of the first was the action of the authorities in Ramleh where compulso- ry residence orders were used to frighten a number of young people and force them to leave the Young Communist ‘League. As to the second objective the anti-commu- nist campaign has never disappeared, though its intensity varies. Demand Withdrawal The Israeli ruling circles are most fearful of all the peace forces and concretely of the Com- munist Party of Israel because it embodies, in - its policy, the best interests of the Israeli peo- ple. This is the more so because being a party uniting Jewish and Arab communists it em- phasizes the validity of the community of in- terests of both the Jewish and Arab peoples. - By calling for the implementation of the Security Council resolution No. 242, it merges patriotism with internationalism. By demand- ing the withdrawal of the Israeli forces from the occupied Arab territories, and the recog- nition of the sovereignty and independence of all states in the region, by demanding the res- pect of the right of all the peoples in the Mid- dle East, including the rights of the people of Israel and the Palestine Arab people, the Com- munist Party of Israel expresses the highest national interests of Israel. . Unpopular Policy The Israeli Government practises cynicism and shows disrespect to peoples’ intelligence when it claims that its measures are invoked to “safeguard the security of Israel!” The fact that these restrictions are part of the general anti-communist incitement and har- assment of communists and anti-war forces negates the claim that compulsory residence orders against scores of Israeli citizens are a, measure against a “threat to the country’s security.” : Only political considerations and a fear for a growing unpopular policy, can prompt the Is- raeli ruling circles to take such arbitrary, course actions which trampie on democratic freedoms and deprive citizens of their elemen- tary right—freedom of movement in their homeland. We therefore call upon you to express your solidarity with the fight to eliminate this gross violation of democracy which is also an ex- pression of national discrimination. The letter, signed by Meir Vilner, general secretary of the Communist Party of Israel, calls upon Canadians to ‘publicize these facts; mobilize support in defense of the people fight- ing for peace and against the policy of aggres- sion and annexation, and protest to the Israeli Government, demanding the abrogation of these restrictions which are a flagrant viola- tion of the basic principles of human rights.” PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, DECEMBER 22, 1972—PAGE 6 These Lebanese children, killed this year by Israeli raiders, were victims of long-range Israeli plan, blurted out by General Peled, to permanently incorporate Arab lands into Israel. Plan since 1967: to keep Arab lands It is five years since the UN Security Council unanimously de- manded the evacuation of Isra- eli troops from all Arab territo- ries ocuupied as a result of ag- * gression. Yet, stubbornly follow- ing its policy of annexation, Israel is seeking to “legalize” the fruits of its aggression. “By all indications, not only does Tel Aviv not intend to ful- fill “the resolution of the UN Security Council, but it comes out with new plans for their ‘Israelization’,” journalist L. Koryavin points out in the Soviet newspaper, Izvestia, and is incorporating these territo- ries into the state of Israel. This is evidenced by Tel Aviv’s new illegal actions con- cerning the occupied Gaza sec- tor, the western bank of the Jordan River, and Golan Heights ‘in Syria. The Tel Aviv authori- ties have worked out strategic plans for the “development” of Arab territories, spread over 10 years. Plan to Keep Arab Lands The Izvestia journalist re- lates that, ‘“‘A representative of the Palestine Liberation Organ- ization, Said Hassan,.in a mes- sage to the UN Special Political Committee, referred in this con- nection to a very eloquent re- port in the Tel Aviv newspaper Ma’ariv quoting Israeli General Peled who had blurted out the secret plans of Tel Aviv. “According to the general, Israel by its 1967 attack had intended to undermine forever the military potential of Egypt and other Arab states and thus first establish its military and political dominance in the oc- cupied Arab territories and then make also “de jure” their incor- poration into the Israeli state,” said Koryavin. Israel appears determined to continue setting up’ in occupied Arab territories its militarized settlements, expelling the indi- genous Arab population from their native places and replac- ing them by Israelis. In those settlements, as an Arab journal- ist aptly put it, “the sword will prevail over the plough.” With purely military functions as- signed to them, the settlements will become bases for Tel Aviv’s new aggressive plans. _ No U.S. Peace Bids The Moslem Council of Jerus- alem published a statement re- cently stressing that there are instances when the occupation” ~ authorities try to oust the Arab population and replace it by Is- raelis. They are_also closing down Moslem mosques and re- building them into “religious units of Judaism.” Arab political circles connect the outrages being committed by the Israeli occupiers in the captured Arab. territories with the support which Tel Aviv re- ceives from the United States. Vice-Premier and Minister of Information and Culture of Egypt, Hatem stressed that at present there are no proposals coming from the U.S. on the settlement of the Middle East crisis, especially proposals which would be aimed at the evacuation of Israeli troops from the occupied Arab territo- ries. Moreover, Washington, as the minister stressed, also put pressure on the UN to try to prevent the discussion there of Israeli outrages. In an Israeli concentration camp.