New policies needed for economic recovery, jobs not bombs Communists advance emergency program Fellow Canadians: Parliament is now in session. Will it act in the interests of the corporations or in the interests of the people? Will it continue policies which have led to mass unemployment and lowered liv- ing standards with no prospects for the young generation, or undertake policies to Put Canada Back to Work through the systematic development and strengthen- ing of the Canadian economy, particu- larly secondary industry? Will it annul the Cruise or go along with the dangerous first-strike nuclear strategy of the Reagan Administration with all its disastrous consequences for Canada and world peace? These questions must be answered and soon by the actions of the people. One-Sided Recovery It has become increasingly clear that the much vaunted recovery has shown itself to be one-sided. There is recovery for the multi- nationals, the corporations and bank but not for the people. Present day unemployment remains at an all time high while living standards continue to decline. The 6 and 5 per cent wage restraint program, the federal and provincial austerity programs, curtail- ments of trade union rights, none of those monopoly-inspired ‘‘solutions’’ has brought real recovery to the Canadian people. On the contrary, while they have brought increased profits to the corpor- ations and banks, they have stood in the way of genuine recovery. Capitalism is showing itself unable to cope with the problems of the people. It doesn’t work for the people, only for the corporations and the rich. There can be no genuine recovery for the people based on the policy of reduc- ing living standards and creating per- manent unemployment. These policies must be ended. Dynamic Strategy Needed Canada needs a dynamic industrial strategy directed to create jobs, raise the purchasing power of the people and strengthen the independence of the country. It has all the resources and manpower to expand production and make the economy work for the people. What stands in the way is multi- national and monopoly control of the Canadian economy. U.S. imperialism is clearly determined that Canada remain a resource hinterland for the U.S. It seeks in every way to undermine the pursuit of an independent course by Canada be it in economic poli- cy, foreign policy, culture. As long as Canada is tied to the U.S. economy and accepts a policy of integration with it, it will suffer the consequences in a dis- torted economy and large scale unemployment. Thus, no basic change in the economy is possible without a decisive struggle to bring an end to U.S. domination and con- trol over the key sectors of the Canadian economy. And no economic revival is possible without ending such control through democratic public ownership. End U.S. Control Bringing an end to U.S. control over the Canadian economy would enable the major economic decisions to be made by the people. Social need, not maximum profits, would have priority. Buttressed by a public investment policy, by in- COMMUNIST PARTY STATEMENT creased purchasing power, a reduction in hours of work with no reduction in take home pay and further improvements in social benefits — combined with an in- dependent foreign policy of peace — these would open the door to achieving full employment. Peace and jobs go together. An arms program does not lead to prosperity but to destruction. Investments in the mili- tary sphere create fewer jobs than investments in the peaceful sectors of the economy. In short the arms program is a job killer, not a job creator. Permitting the testing of the Cruise missile on Canadian soil ties Canada to the first strike nuclear arms program and war policies of the Reagan ad- ministration. Cruise testing in Canada must be an- nulled. Canada should declare itself a nuclear weapons-free zone. The um- brella agreement should be annulled and Canada’s voice must be raised against any new missiles in western Europe. Answer Lies with People Instead of spending billions for arms Canada needs a program to create jobs for all. Will Parliament undertake such a pro- gram? The answer lies with the people. It is not enough to say as the Tories do — “jobs, jobs, jobs’? without coming forward with a program that would lead to jobs. Their neo-conservative ‘anti- people’s program would throw open the door of Canada to uncontrolled U.S. investments and to further U.S. take- Capitalism is showing itself unable to cope with the problems of the people. It doesn’t work for the people, only for the corporations and the rich. . . . Peace and jobs go together ... An arms program does not lead to prosperity but to destruction. Prize-winning cartoon by V.M. Martikainen, Finland: “No to war!” overs of the Canadian economy. Ex perience has already shown that this road does not lead to jobs but to the under- mining of the ability of Canada to make | its own decisions in its own interests. | Nor is it enough to say, as the Trudeau | government does, that “‘high tech” and ‘freer’ trade with the U.S. will solve unemployment when in fact it adds to it. These policies have proven them- selves bankrupt. A policy of Canada-U.S. integration, of continentalism, of free trade, a cus | ‘toms union, no matter what you call it, i8 | a recipe to disaster for Canada and het | people. The path to jobs and full employment lies through independent economi¢ development based on public ownership under democratic control of the key sec | tors of the economy, coupled with a? | independent. foreign policy directed 10 | strengthen Canada’s voice as a voice 0 peace in the world. An Emergency Program | The Communist Party of Canada prop’ oses that as steps towards a full employ- ment policy the following emergency pro gram be adopted by Parliament: e A ban on closures and layoffs. e Takeover of closed factories by thé | government. ; e Unemployment Insurance. pay- | ments to commence fromthe first day of | layoffs and continue for the duration of | unemployment at 90 per cent of earnings: | e Anend to the 6 & 5 wage restraint program and other austerity programs | and the restoration of collective bargail | ing ‘and right to strike: © it e Training and retraining of youné | people to meet technological change. | e Reduction of hours of work to 3 with no loss in take-home pay. i) e Nocuts in public spending. A mas" | sive investment program of publi¢ ) works, housing and other job creatiné programs. =a e Expand ‘spending on’ health, ed” . ucation and on cultural'development. | e Nationalization under democratl¢ | control of all multinational corporations: | bank and other financial institutions. , | e Defend the family: farm. Defend present Crowsnest rates. ald e The further expansion of econom’ | relations with the socialist and develo’ | ing countries on a mutually satisfactory | basis. e Funds for such programs to come out of the arms program and through 1 creased taxes on corporations, banks | insurance companies. Unity of Action To win such a program of jobs will require great effort. It will require abo™’ | all, the unity of action of the organiZ® labor and democratic movement, the U® employed, and the allies of labor in cil and countryside. People’s coalitio® | headed by organized labor should be built everywhere, as in British Columb to undertake such a massive campaig® i Put Canada Back to Work. Only sv¢, massive public action can com parliament to begin to act in the interes of the people, not as up to now int interests of the profits of the corporatiO and the rich. A policy of full employment ca? me won. But it calls for new policies and new direction for Canada. - ns Central Executive Committe Communist Party of Cana September 14, 1 PACIFIC TRIBUNE—SEPTEMBER 21, 1983—Page 8