Kim Zander, United Fishermen and Allied Workers’ Union, writes: On Jure 6 and 7, I was one of about 150 people to attend an unemployed con- ference organized by the B.C. Federation of Labor. It was a conference that I, as an unemployed shoreworker, welcomed with open arms. As many people know, the fishing industry in British Columbia has been all but destroyed, leav- ing hundreds, even thousands, out of work. They only thing they have to look to, if they qualify, is unemployment: in- surance or welfare, both of which mean poverty level ex- istence. Quite evident in the con- ference (and in the daily news) was the fact that I was not alone in not having a job. I am one of hundreds of thousands and that is only according to the official statistic which hides thousands of the unemployed. Introduced at the beginning of the conference was a working paper which laid out some basic guidelines for “‘labor’s policy program.”’ It was.a fairly good paper which outlined the pro- blems of the unemployed. As the Port Alberni Organization of Unemployed Workers put it, we are “‘condemned to starve, compelled to act.”’ The debate at the conference by delegates of unions affiliated to the B.C. Fed as well as the Carpenters Union, strengthen- ed the working paper and brought forward several pro- posals for action. One of them was raised over and over again and to me it was the most important point raised in the conference: the necessity to organize the unemployed. It was here that I was disap- pointed in the B.C. Fed’s pro- gram for not even once was the organization of the unemployed raised in the papers handed out at the conference. Several people emphasized that if the trade union move- ment doesn’t organize the unemployed, they will be organized against labor.- The unemployed may not have any desire to take people’s jobs or work for substandard wages but unless they can see themselves as part of the labor movement, they can be used and manipulated by employers — and once again working people will be paying for a crisis they had no hand in creating. When the issue of organizing the unemployed was debated at the conference, feelings were strongly expressed. The brothers and sisters there were Unions should be organizing jobless agreed that the unemployed had to be organized to fight along with labor for their rights as Canadians, including their right to a job. As an unemployed worker who faces an uncertain future in an industry that is in crisis, I need to know that the labor movement will take leadership in organizing the unemployed. It can’t wait for elections — we need action now. Peace issue for OAPO _ Hamish MacKay, Burnaby delegate to the Old Age Pen- sioners Organization conven- tion, writes: The B.C. Old Age Pensioners Organization con- vention was held June 16-18 in Haney with 142 delegates in at- tendance as well as 13 executive board members and 96 visitors. ' Some very good resolution were endorsed by the meeting, the most important being a composite resolution on world peace based on resolutions sub- mitted by two branches, Vernon and Port Coquitlam. It read: “Whereas tremendous amounts of money are being spent on ar- _maments which would be better spent on the starving peoples of the world, therefore be it resolv- ed that this convention is in favor of negotiations for gradual disarmament of all na- tions, leading to world peace, under the supervision of the United Nations.” Another important area of convention action was that deal- ing with cutbacks in health care. There were two important resolutions. The first called on the provincial ministry of health to reconsider its financial cut- backs to hospitals and also call- ed on the federal government to prevent doctors from double- billing their patients. Another resolution noted that hospitals are ‘‘starved for funds’’ and requested that the provincial government apply the revenue raised by the provin- cial sales tax directly to hospital and health services as was in- tended in the original legisla- tion, rather than placing it in general revenue. Delegates also passed a mo- tion from Port Coquitlam Branch 21 calling on the Cana- dian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commis- sion to rescind the latest rate in- crease given B.C. Telephone. Business scapegoats city | On June 17, a number of Van- couver business people, variously estimated at between 350 and 500, - held a meeting in Kitsilano High School to protest increased proper- ty taxes on business. The meeting was billed as non- political, but if that gathering was non-political and non-partisan, then we could say with equal “veracity”’ that all sharks have become vegetarians. One of the main speakers was none other than Jonathan Baker, the NPA candidate for mayor, who was there to drum up support for his mayoralty campaign. Other speakers included businessman David Mathews, a former Social Credit candidate, Philip Owen, a former NPA can- didate, and Fred Cavanaugh, who was recruiting for the NPA while leading a campaign against barriers . It was cleatly a meeting organiz- ed by Social Credit and NPA business people to develop support for the NPA and take the heat off the provincial government. And in case you might think that this was a meeting of small businessmen, bear in mind that one of the main speakers, Philip Owen, is also president of the Vancouver Downtown Business Association which speaks for the really big businesses in this city. He had the gall to say that the business tax which we have in the city is a “penalty for doing business in Vancouver’’ and demanded it be abolished. He failed to mention, of course, the many extra expenses that taxpayers have to bear to ser- vice his business friends, in the form of street maintenance, police protection, fire protection and so on. The business tax repays the city for only a small part of these extra expenses. All the speakers at this meeting were united on one issue — that city council, and especially COPE, were responsible for their higher taxes. That again showed their, political bias. They were a Social Credit and NPA crowd; the whole purpose of the exercise was to take the heat off the provincial govern- ment and blame city council. In do- eg they stood the facts on their The property tax policies that municipalities operate under —and this applies to both taxes for general revenue and school taxes — are established by the provincial government. The only choice municipal councils have is to choose one of four ‘‘options’’ for- mulated by the provincial govern- ment, all of them bad. All that these options do is distribute the tax burden — if they use one option, more of the burden is shifted to homeowners. If they use another option, more has to be paid by Harry Rankin business. This ‘‘option’’ system was designed by the provincial government to place all the blame on municipal councils and to get homeowners and business people fighting among themselves. The whole purpose of the ‘‘option”’ system is to make municipal pro- perty owners pay more so that the provincial government is able to pay less, and that is exactly what is happening. On top of that the provincial government this year reduced grants to municipalities, (the grant to Vancouver was reduced by $7 million), forcing them to increase taxes still more. ~ That still isn’t the whole’ story. The provincial government’ ap- ‘would be possible to give a break 0 points the assessment commission: Its practice has been to assess commercial and industrial busine properties at far below their marke) value and so permit them to escap paying their fair share of taxes. Having said all that, it must als? be emphasized that the smal business person, (and this applié to homeowners with low incomé too), is hurting. One solution to this problet would be a variable or differentid mill rate that would enable municipal councils to levy differet! mill rates on different kinds of pre perty and also according to the! size (their ability to pay). Then small business people and to cot pel big business to bear the main t# burden. Another solution would to assess big commercial and it dustrial properties at their market value and compel them 10 pay their fair share of taxes. Of course the real problem fac ing the small business person is the state of the economy. They will jus have to join with labor in fighting for new government policies tha! will stimulate the economy and put more money into the pockets of working people — policies such 4 a big program of building affot dable housing, lower interest rates; a roll-back of energy prices building a Canadian merchant marine, and building secondary manufacturing industries to pro- duce many of the things we import! today from the U.S. and Japan, (many. of which are made from) B.C. raw materials in any case). and Bukovsky’s — claim of ‘‘Kremlin manipula- tion’’of the peace movement. “T do not believe that people will allow themselves Hanna Kawas, if Canada-Palestine Assoc. An Evening of Solidarity with the Palestinian People Sunday, July 11 — Ukrainian Hall, 805 East Pender Street Speakers: Bruce Yorke, Vancouver alderman Includes salmon barbecue; Adm. $7, OAP $5; Sponsored by Vancouver East Club, CPC t was probably inevitable that with the huge up- surge in the disarmament movement, some misanthropic voice would come forth from the media to tell everyone that they are ‘misguided, even duped, and have chosen the wrong issue on which to campaign. That is apparently the mission that Province col- umnist Mike Tytherleigh has chosen if his column June 28 is any indication..Apparently oblivious to the real fear that many have for the very future of humanity, he would have everyone join him, stan- ding on the brink, looking backwards through the telescope to an earlier cold war. ‘‘The trouble is with the peace movement,”’ he writes balefully, ‘‘is that it has latched on to the issue of peace versus war rather than freedom versus slavery.”’ From there he turns it over to former Soviet dissi- dent Vladimir Bukovsky whose burden, of course, is that the peace movement has been engineered from Moscow. He berates those demonstrating for disamament with these words: ‘‘Your recent mass demonstrations were disastrous because in them, you identified yourselves, willingly or unwillingly, with the rulers of the Eastern countries.”’ Giving Bukovsky the tag of ‘‘respected author’’ for the purpose of his column, Tytherleigh echoes that assertion. ‘“The movement includes many well- intentioned and genuinely concerned and frightened people but the company they keep leaves much to be desired,”’ he lectures, quoting a New York Times writer to claim that those campaigning for disarma- ment are “‘manipulated by the Kremlin.’”. As it turns out, the appearance of Tytherleigh’s column coincided with the arrival in our office of a report of the final press conference in Moscow by the Parliamentarians for World Order, headed by Doug Roche, the Conservative MP for Edmonton tarians in 24 countries, was there just before the UN session opened. Significantly, Roche answered Tytherleigh’s — Beople and issues South. The group, which represents 600 parliamen- . to be pushed around,”’ he stated. ‘‘They are pro- testing because they are concerned. I am concerned too. But nobody pushed me. I have five children and I want them to have a life. I don’t want to see them destroy In that press conference, Roche had some other things to say, on the question of parity of nuclear | arsenals and on ‘‘limited nuclear war.’’ On the first issue, he said: ‘“We are certain, based on our study by reputable experts, that there exists today a rough parity between the two superpowers.’ On the issue of limited war, he was forthright: “We reject completely the idea that there could bea limited nuclear war. It is our belief that. limited nuclear war would quickly move into general wholesale destruction.”’ At the end, he told reporters: ‘‘We leave Moscow with a measure of hope.”’ That hope — that a comprehensive arms reduc- tion treaty can be achieved — is the hope of millions. It is the hope of all of those who have marched in the disarmament campaign. But apparently it is a hope that Tytherleigh and Bukovsky cannot — or will not — comprehend. * * * T he- hardworking staff at the People’s Co- operative Bookstore in Vancouver now has 2 Volkswagen van to get their wares around the pro- vince thanks’ to the generosity of Tribune reader Elaine Podovinnikoff. Elaine donated the van to the store following the death in February of her hus- band Nick, who had earlier outfitted the vehicle as a camper. Ironically, Elaine had to pay a price to Victoria for her donation. Since provincial tax authorities don’t accept the idea of cars as gifts, she had to pay sales tax on what Victoria deemed to bea fair market value. Despite that, the licensing and transfer of owner-. ship was completed this month and store manager Linda Chobotuck hopes to use the van soon to begin getting books around to various centres in the pro- vince. — PACIFIC TRIBUNE—JULY 2, 1982—Page 2