ety a> tt ete 3 vi FRIDAY, JULY 31, 1970 Tribune VOL. 31 NO. 31 10c¢ TENANTS DEMAND ACTION BY OTTAWA ‘ Ottawa should use its powers under the BNA Act to establish Canada-wide rent controls. This demand came from B.C.’s provincial tenants organization in a brief presented to the House of Commons Committee on Finance, Trade and Economic Affairs, sitting in NOVA SCOTIA FISHERMEN IN OTTAWA. Carrying on their f travelled from the Maritimes to put their case before MPs. Minister Bryce Mackasey and Nova Scotia labor minister Thomas J Skeover two foreign companies who refuse to recognize or negotiate with the unio ight for recognition of the UFAWU, fishermen On July 20 the UFAWU wired federal labor McKeogh demanding that the government n of the workers choice. Victoria on Monday. Pointing out that the Bureau of Statistics says that shelter accounts for 32 percent of the spending of the typical Canadian family, the brief asks: ‘‘What better place to start fighting the battle of inflation than in an area in which the government itself has been a major contri butor?”’ Challenging the Bureau of Statistics figure of 32 percent as being below the average rents actually paid, the tenant’s brief, presented by secretary Bruce Yorke, charges that average rents paid in Vancouver have more than doubled in less than a decade. ; Yorke said that average rents paid in the city of Vancouver would be $150 per month, and in reply to questions charged that about 52 percent of rents now paid by tenants go for payment oninterest charges. In reply to questions, Yorke charged that the provincial government had evaded respon- sibility for rent controls by ‘Share the wealth’- Pulp Union ~The companies raise their Prices because of two reasons: the ability of the customer to Pay and the cost to produce. “We intend to base our wages On the same two reasons — the Companies ability to pay and our Cost to place our labor at their Isposal. Part of our cost is Ousing, clothing, food, trans- Portation, etc.’’ The Leaflet, °rgan. of the Pulp and Paper "0rkers, concisely put on the ie in the above statement the Teasons that their 5,000 members Went on strike last Friday. The €aflet makes it clear that their Workers, and thousands more across B.C. are determined to Sain a larger share of the trem- €ndous wealth of this province as 'S their need, and their right. Gus Leonidas, government appointed mediator, has turned a report on his attempts to Ting about a settlement €tween the companies and the Pulp and Paper Workers. It is understood that once a report, unsatisfactory to the workers is submitted by the mediator, they are free to strike. In the case of the Inter- national Brotherhood of Pulp and Paper Workers and the United Papermakers and Paper- workers union, the mediation commission appointed the same mediator, Gus Leonidas, to try to end their dispute with the companies, thus preventing them from taking strike action. The PPWC were offered the minimum by the companies. A three year contract with five percent annual increase the first two years, and six percent in the third. Understandably the union’s reply was ‘‘No way!” * KK Members of the Carpenter’s Union are voting this week on recommendations made by Deputy: Labor Minister Sands who has been acting as mediator in the construction lockout. No details of the offer will be made public until after the vote is taken. — At Trail, Cominco employees are voting this week on a company offer. Here again no details are available. An injunction was granted to Weldwood Sales with “‘regret”’ by Justice Kirke Smith to stop IWA members from picketing their office. Although Weldwood Sales is a wholly-owned sub- sidiary of Weldwood of Canada, the company claims it is ‘“independent.’’ The IWA is on strike at the Kent street plant of Weldwood. In the meantime, Mr. Justice Nemetz, head of an industrial inquiry into the Forest-Labor dispute, has adopted a get-tough attitude with union and manage- ment over work stoppages at Tahsis, on Vancouver Island. John Billings, chief negotiator for the forest industry, said “We’re doing everything we can to keep the lid on things, but as an organization we must support our members.”’ As a union, IWA leaders obviously have the same respon- sibility, but Billings sees one condition for management, another for labor. Jack Moore of the IWA said union men are fed up with Billing’s whining. “The workers are frustrated. Their contract expired a month ago and the industry’s lockout threat is hanging over their heads,”’ he said. He told Chief Justice Nemetz that if Billings continued to waste time bringing up small matters there wouldn’t be time to get down to the major issues. passing it on to the munici- palities who in turn are passing the buck by saying that a single municipality cannot pass rent control regulations. Runaway rents are a national problem and only the Federal government can establish meaningful controls, said Yorke. The tenant’s brief urges that “‘the government freeze rents. on all existing premises . . and that rents on new apart- ments be established at a level corresponding to the average market rent for that type of accommodation in the area concerned.”’ The tenants brief favors the federal White Paper proposals for a capital gains tax and elim- ination of what it calls the “‘depreciation scandal’’ under which landlords can charge as much as 10 percent per year depreciation rate for income tax purposes. However, the brief warns that unless nation-wide rent controls are imposed at the same time that these changes are implemented tenants might be forced by large landlords to bear the extra burden through higher rents. The brief charges that the present Income Tax Act which allows depreciation but without a capital gains tax, has ‘‘actually served to promote the runaway rents most tenants have had inflicted on them.” Pointing out that pressure for high rents is mainly generated by monopoly control of housing and the high interest rates demanded by moneylenders, the brief concludes by saying: “The long suffering tenants, constituting in all likelihood the majority of the Canadian popula- tion, must be given meaningful relief, both from the exhorbi- tant rents forced on us by the landlord-mortgage holder, as well as from our high taxes.”’ WHO IS TO BLAME for lead pollution in Richmond? —See page 2 | He iat jie {| We 4 ted