LABOR OFL delegates demand leadership Fight for jobs planned By MIKE PHILLIPS TORONTO — Delegates to the 29th Ontario Federation of Labor convention delivered a clear messagetothefederation leadership, lastweekthatit isn’t good enough just passing resolutions at an annual convention, they have to be implemented. That message was repeatedly hammered home by the delegates during the week-long gathering that began Nov. 11. It was reflected in the referal On Opening day of the executive’s centre-piece economic statement, ‘‘An economy geared to jobs and decent incomes’’. It was evident again when the convention un- animously endorsed a controversial resolution reaffirming the OFL’s commitment to maintaining its anti-racism program and the promise by such federation leaders as treasurer Wally Majesky that a full-time coordinator to run that program will be sought. It was captured in Steelworkers delegate John Martin’s frustration over certain leaders’ adoption of the rhetoric of action without following through. I'm sick and tired of coming to conventions to vote on resolutions that don’t get acted on’’, Mar- tin said. Addressing the executive he urged it to “get off your ass and do the job you were elected to do. If you don’t want to do it or you can’t, don’t Stand for re-election.” Bank Occupied . The militancy developing at the grassroots of the Movement was revealed during the noon-hour demonstration by the entire convention supporting Commerce Bank and Commerce VISA strikers, Nov. 12. Not only did the delegates pour out of the Sheraton Hotel in a massive wave of solidarity for the striking bank workers, but they stopped traffic along Bay street for three or four blocks and oc- Cupied the Commerce Bank’s plush headquarters in the heart of Canada’s financial district for more than half an hour. Many OFL delegates came to Toronto worried about the federal Tory government’s mad dash toward free trade with the U.S.; confronting an unprecedented challenge by union haters, backed by the reacionary National Citizen’s Coalition and aimed at destroying the trade union movement, impatient over the trade union movement's failure to put into action the Canadian Labour Congress decision of \its 1984 convention to organize a country-wide March for Jobs — an initiative later adopted then postponed, by the OFL; and, anxious to see labor finally move into centre-stage with the forces in this country fighting for peace, dis- armament and the creation of a mighty peace coal- ition throughout the country. These and other issues such as the fight for jobs and shorter hours, democratic control over tech change, the fight to end sex discrimination and for equal pay for work of equal value, the struggle for better health and safety laws and for labor- controlled occupational health clinics were reflected in the dozens of resolutions adopted by the delegates during the convention. Paper Criticized The fight to strengthen what CUPE delegate Rosemary Baycroft described as an ‘“‘embarass - ingly weak’’ economic paper, set the tone for the entire convention. She and other delegates who took part in the Ontario Action Caucus at the convention zeroed in on the document’s key shortcomings: its failure to identify clearly the transnational corporations as labor’s main enemy and the root of both the cycli- cal and the structural crisis gripping the capitalist system; and, its failure to outline the alternative economic program the trade union movement has been developing to counter the crisis. Baycroft criticized the paper for failing to ‘‘dis- cuss the real problem of expanding corporate con- trol over the economy . . . we don’t need corporate disclosures of their activities, but controls over their powers.” Alternative Program United Electrical workers research director Jim Turk dissected the paper’s flaws. It ignored the demand for shorter hours with no loss in pay. And it excluded labor’s clearly defined alternative pro- gram based on nationalizing the financial in- stitutions and the major, key economic sectors in the country. ‘‘We need an economic statement that clearly lays out why we have a problem and who’s re- sponsible; that lays out what labor proposes to do about it in the short term and in the long term; how to achieve what we want; and, what the conse- quences are for all of us if we don’t’’, Turk said. When the paper returned to the convention, the following day, it included, in addition to the prom- ised March for Jobs and against Free Trade: e a leadership commitment to organize and co- ordinate community action groups and coalitions at the regional, municipal and provincial levels around the fight for jobs and for job creation; e an eight-point economic program based on public ownership of the financial institutions and banks, and ‘‘key industrial establishments’’, the restoration and expansion of public services, shor- ter work time with no loss in pay, an OFL cam- paign against contracting out and public service cuts, the right to a job, democratic control over tech change and the establishment of a fully porta- ble pension system. UAW LEADER BOB WHITE: “Labor has an enormous role in launching a national debate which the Mulroney government doesn’t want to take place.” Support for peace With the Canadian Peace Alliance being born as OFL delegates convened, Nov. 11, the setting was in place for labor to strengthen its commitment to peace action. This it did, with the overwhelming adoption of resolutions demanding an end to Canadian participation in Star Wars re- search and development, and calling for the development of an independent Canadian foreign policy. The convention called for an independent foreign policy for Canada that would be based on declaring this country a nuclear weapons-free zone, withdrawing Canada from NATO and Norad, a freeze on the production and deployment of nuclear and conventional weapons leading to a balanced and mutual reduc- tion, and a reduction of the arms budget, shifting these resources to civilian uses and projects. This resolution also called for labor to work at building an all-inclusive Canada-wide alliance of peace forces. The only two delegates to argue against the resolutions were members of the Union of National Defence Employees, an af- filiate of the Public Service Alliance of Canada, who opposed the reduction of the military budget because they fear their members’ jobs would suffer. This point, however, was answered by Pat Clancy of the UAW who pointed out that any increase in government spending on arms usually comes at the expense of spending on social services. The trade union movement, he said, has to speak against the insanity of the nuclear build-up and for the preservation of the human race. ‘‘When we’re talking about the nuclear build-up, we’re talking about insanity and supporting the insane,’’ Clancy told the dele- gates. ‘*So that our kids, our kids’ kids, and their kids after them can live in a world of peace and social justice, we in the labor move- ment have to start today in laying the foundation for that peace.” oS bor hits hard at free trade pact TORONTO — The labor Movement has a special respon- Sibility for leading the crucial de- bate on free trade and Canada’s ture, auto union leader Bob White told the OFL convention, Nov. 12. _ White’s address to the conven- tion was one of a trio of speeches Y influential trade union leaders which helped set the stage for the Convention debate on a policy Paper commiting the OFL to . 'Mmediately convene’’ a meet- 'Ng of the heads of unions in the Province to mobilize an action Campaign against free trade. It also calls on the federation to “build a coalition with like- minded groups across Ontario to Mobilize public support for la- T's position.” N his opening address to the Convention, President Cliff Pilkey Warned that ‘‘free trade has noth- 'Ng to do with economic security and everything to do with com- promising our political, economic and cultural sovereignty.” Should Canada enter into a free trade agreement with the WeSs, Pilkey predicted, more than 270,000 Ontario jobs would likely disappear in such manufacturing sectors as machinery, textiles, furniture, and electrical goods. At least another seven per cent of the Canadian labor force (on top of the current unemployed level) could be left jobless, he said. Mulroney Contradiction It was a theme Canadian Labor Congress president Dennis McDermott continued in his speech to the delegation. He pointed to the contradiction between Prime Minister Mul- roney’s claim that Canada’s cul- tural sovereignty, economic independence and our social pro- grams aren't negotiable, and the utterances of top U.S. diplomats and trade officials that everything is on the table for discussion. The CLC leader listed the so- cial services and social benefits already being targetted by various U.S. interests for elimination as so-called non tariff barriers. De- scribed by the Americans as ‘tunfair subsidies’ that block the path to the creation of an ‘even playing field’ from which each country will trade are: unem- ployment insurance, medicare, worker’s compensation, health and safety laws, regional development programs, labor codes protecting union security, laws to protect our culture, and the list goes on. Canadians will pay a high price for free trade, McDermott told the delegates. ‘‘That price, I be- lieve is a country ripe for profit making, and a labor force that is conveniently docile, intimidated, willing to work for less. “The price ultimately is our status as an independent coun- try,’ McDermott said. Bob White emphasized the leadership role labor and the elected officers of the trade union movement must assume in help- ing their members understand the dangerous implications of free trade and mobilizing them into ac- tion against it with other forces that will be adversely affected. Labor and Free Trade ‘*Labor has an enormous role in launching a national debate which the Mulroney government doesn’t want to take place,” White told the convention. Opinion polls, he said, show the vast majority of Canadians are concerned about the issue. The federal Tory government’s strategy, he said, is ‘“‘to keep a blanket on the debate and just keep walking us down that road quietly, but very quickly.” He challenged voices in the big business and government elite who push free trade as the road to Canada’s future prosperity. ‘‘The people that have the faith in this country are not those that want to tie themselves to the U.S., but they are those who believe we can develop this nation as Canadians first and not as a branch plant of the U.S. economy,”’ he said. The debate on the convention floor revealed solid unity in labor’s ranks against free trade. CAMCO worker Ron Volterman of Hamilton, speaking on a companion resolution to the anti-free trade policy paper, put a human face on the looming crisis. “If free trade is allowed to progress to fruition I'll be out of a job along with 1,300 other people in my plant,” the UE delegate said. “If free trade comes to Canada there would be no reason for a company like General Elec- tric to compete with itself, and the plant I now work in would be- come a warehouse ... Free trade is not free — it will cost jobs, jobs, jobs, and more jobs.” PACIFIC TRIBUNE, NOVEMBER 20, 1985 e 5