Letters/Canada ~ Stand on-China m In my view, the Communist Party of Canada’s central committee statement on . events in China (“Attack on Chinese stu- dents deplored,” June 12) fell short of the mark. By bending over backwards to be fair to the leadership of the Chinese party, the Statement raises more questions than it answers about the Canadian party’s atti- tude to socialism and democracy. The statement declares that the Canadian Party, while not judging “the legitimacy or otherwise” of the views of the students, believes that “socialism and the socialist State must be able to deal with such differ- €nces without resort to armed force against the people.” The statement “deplores” the Massacre but seems unwilling to condemn it outright, saying that it does not appear the Students posed “a threat to state security that would warrant military intervention of this kind.” (My emphasis.) Canadian workers are right to ask, “If this is socialism, who needs it?” Socialists of various tendencies, including members of Communist parties in Eastern Europe, are hard at work cultivating the idea that social- 1sm without full democracy and the highest Standards of morality and ethics is not Socialism at all. By this yardstick, the mas- Sacre at Tiananmen Square is completely Contrary to the ideals of socialism and should be condemned as such. The Canadian party statement warns that the situation is complex and sees the dark hand of the “international big business media” at work “to exploit this tragedy to undermine the international prestige of Socialism and destabilize socialist China.” No doubt the situation is complex, but there can be no misunderstanding the fact that the bullets of the People’s Liberation Army did more damage to the prestige of Socialism that day than all of the media’s efforts. If intemational imperialism is anx- 10us to “destabilize socialist China,” as the Statement Claims, why was Henry Kissinger denouncing any move to sanctions within hours of the massacre? In the coming re-assessment of China Tanks in Tiananmen Square. and the impact of the pro-democracy movement, some tough questions need to be asked again. Is China socialist? Isn’t it time that the Canadian left confronted the continuing elements of Stalinism in that country, so obvious in the aftermath of the massacre? This major feature of Chinese political life, which was the root of the Sino- Soviet split, was ignored by many elements of the Canadian left during the 1970s just as it was ignored by American investors keen to exploit the modernization drive. Another good question would be, “Is China capitalist?” In the May 14 issue of Moscow News, Lu Congmin, a professor at the central committee party school of the Communist Party of China, writes that “modern industrialized capitalism has entered a stage of transfer over to social- ism.” In modern capitalism, he claims, we see “nothing élse than a beginning of a planned economy. “The new distribution of incomes done by the government, as well as the develop- isses mark ment of the system of social security, help to reduce the differences between the rich and the poor, the workers and the farmers, the town and the countryside, and help the spread of culture and education. When we say that modern capitalism carries in it some elements of socialism, we think of industrialized countries.” British, Canadian and American workers will be hard-pressed to recognize their coun- tries in Lu Congmin’s analysis. If he’s right, perhaps B.C. workers should support Social Credit to get some more of those “elements of socialism.” The Canadian left has a tough enough task defining what it means by socialism and how it proposes to get there without linking the whole issue to a “socialist China” in which protesters are mowed down with machine guns and more capital- ism speeds the arrival of socialism. Geoff Meggs, Vancouver International ban on force needed May I, though the columns of your Paper, express the impression I get of the Significance of the recent and current events in China as revealed in the Vancouver Media? To me, taken together, they point up the lesson China rings out loud and clear: elim- inate now the use and the threat of the use of force and violence from public life, national and international. Owhere can human dignity and social Progress be upheld while guns, tanks, bombs and their like are brought into play, Or held in reserve in the wings by contending Se posing governments and other inter- _ What we all need is an end to military dictatorship everywhere. This alone can 8lVe us promise that neither at Kent State Carmanah cut: greed, not jobs I am outraged to see my union S0ing to bed with a forest company. € Carmanah Valley issue is not about jobs, it’s about capitalist greed. Ore jobs are lost due to poor forest Management than will be gained by logging Canada’s largest trees. This Issue has shown Jack Munro, presi- dent of IWA Canada, for the closet Tight winger I have always believed him to be. William Rogers, IWA Local 1-363 university in the U.S. or in China — or anywhere else in the world — will students and unarmed forces of democracy be frus- trated by armed force. At present, unfortunately, due to the per- sistent investment in armaments and pro- motion of world trade in armaments (regardless of the differences in political sys- tems), all major governments and other interests participate in the business of mut- ual profiteering from the sale of armaments. Consequently, the peaceful efforts to expand democracy are everywhere at risk. Have we not had enough of this? Can we not rather get on with implementing INF, moving ahead with START, building confidence-creating measures, closing down the armaments trade, and pledging non- resort to military means in settling differen- ces? Are we so lacking in imagination and goodwill as to be incapable of conceiving a world without war? Can we see no alterna- tive uses for our money, brains and creative ingenuity? Surely, we are not that bankrupt. Beatrice Ferneyhough, Vancouver Not a peaceful protest As an old time supporter and reader of the Tribune, I have been waiting for some- one to give us a true report on China. For I = believe that we haven’t received the real facts. To me it is amusing to see everyone talk- ing about the students fighting for demo- cracy. Just what do they mean by “democracy?” Is it the American, Canadian or British type? Who are we to tell the Chinese about being democratic? How have we treated our Native Indian, French Can- adians, East Indians, Chinese, Japanese or any minorityin Canada. My feelings about what is going on in China, having heard all news and read many reports, is that what started out as an innocent protest from students, who by the way get free education in China, was taken over by outside interests who hoped to over- throw the Chinese government which had to step in and stop what was happening. Some students were throwing “Molotov cocktails” and setting fires — this doesn’t seem at all peaceful to me. I saw the pictures on the American news. We have been bombarded with this . “democratic” baloney and it is high time we became fully aware of what happens to any country that dares to become socialist. I can just see what would happen to us in Canada if we dared to elect an NDP government for instance. So for goodness sake, wake up and do some thinking and quit acting like a bunch of sheep believing everything that the Amer- ican news reports tell us. I hope to see a report in the Tribune with the truth. Thank you. Jeanne D. Teather, Burnaby Peltier’s Supporters seeking finances The recent dismissal by the Supreme Court of Canada of an application to have Native activist Leonard Peltier returned to Canada because his extradition to the U.S. was based on fraudulent evidence does not mean the end of his struggle for freedom but a new beginning, according to the Leonard Peltier Defence Committee (LPCDC). “It is wrong to say the recent appeal decision was a last-ditch attempt,” Anne Fitterer, spokesperson for the LPCDC, told the Tribune. “Tt was really a legal effort to test the waters in the hopes we would have a positive outcome. Unfortunately that is not the case, but now the cam- paign to achieve Peltier’s freedom and justice becomes intensified and diver- sified.” Peltier, an American Indian Move- ment (AIM) activist, was arrested in Hinton, Alta. after fleeing the U.S. following a much-publicized shoot- out on the Pine Ridge Indian Reserva- tion in South Dakota. He was extradited to the U.S. on the basis of an affidavit obtained by - the FBI from Myrtle Poor Bear, who claimed Peltier was present at the scene of the shootings in which two FBI agents were killed. Peltier has resided in a U.S. prison since his extradition, even though it has been revealed the FBI deliberately withheld an earlier affidavit from Poor Bear in which she admitted she was not present. Poor Bear had a his- tory of mental instability and it was later revealed that her statements were coerced. AIM had been the target of an FBI campaign to infiltrate and eliminate its leadership. There were dozens of assassinations and unexplained deaths of Indian activists on the Pine Ridge Reservation and across the country prior to the FBI raid. Peltier’s Canadian supporters are now embarking on an intensive lob- bying campaign with Canadian MPs to educate them on the case and will be sending thousands of petitions and letters that have been coming in from around the world demanding Peltier’s return to Canada to federal Justice Minister Doug Lewis. “The Canadian campaign repres- ents possibly Peltier’s final hope,” Fit- terer said. “But any legal action is only as good as the people behind it — only the people’s support will culminate in his freedom.” Liberal MP Warren Allmand has prepared a Private Members’ bill, M- 418, calling for Peltier’s return to Canada. The Canadian Defence Committee is asking concerned Can- adians to send letters to: Doug Lewis, Minister of Justice-Attorney General . of Canada, House of Commons, Ottawa, Ont., K1A 0A6 calling for Peltier’s return and a full investigation of his fraudulent extradition. Copies should also be sent to Allmand (same address). No postage is required. The Leonard Peltier Canadian Defence Committee is desperate for funding to cover legal and promo- tional expenses. Donations may be sent to 43 Chandler Drive, Scarbo- rough, Ont. MIG 1Z1. Pacific Tribune, July 10, 1989 « 5