P ting A
DISCUSSION:

The confusion as to the dimension of these three equal lots fronting
Kitchener Avenue was probably generated on the mixing up of drawings belonging
to different projects. Whatever the case may be, the fact is that it is
evident that Council made the third reading decision based on inaccurate
information; it is also unclear what the position of the public would be
towards the creation of three 45.5 ft. lots.

The thrust of the third reading approval that 53 ft. lots exceed the
minimum frontage currently permitted under the RS-l zone and, therefore, it
was reasonable to support third reading. Since the lots are narrower than
permitted under RS-1, it is recommended that this project be referred back to
Public Hearing.

Dae

Carlos Peli teh., M.C.I.P.

er, Director of Planning

CF/em

1D642/11-12