British Columbia Foreign control ‘dictates interest rates’ Foreign ownership of Canadian financial assets has effectively placed a strait jacket around the Bank of Canada’s ability to react to domestic events when it sets its monetary policy. Having to take outsiders into account is not a new problem for bank governors, but foreign finance has never before possessed such clout. Foreign capital is now estimated at 20 per cent of all funds driving Canadian capital markets. Foreign ownership in bond markets, where long term interest rates are set, is even higher. The magnitude of the problem can be seen when foreigners own twice as many Canadian bonds as all the Canadian trus- teed pension funds put together. The numbers are unprecedented. Foreigners hold about 30 per cent of all federal bonds, 36 per cent of all provincial bonds, 20 per cent of all municipal bonds and 50 per cent of all corporate bonds. Finance Minister Michael Wilson is therefore right when he says Canada would pay a heavy price for lowering interest rates. What he doesn’t say is that an even higher price will be paid if rates are not lowered. Traditionally, when short term interest rates are lowered the market rallied to longer maturities. Now foreigners who con- trol our bond markets get worried when lower rates cause the Canadian dollar to fall and they sell off their bonds. That puts a upward pressure on long term interest rates. For example, in mid-January when Bank of Canada governor John Crow allowed a slight decrease in the rate in order to deal with ‘ta weakening Canadian economy,” the very hint of a drop, led to a three per cent fall in the dollar and the bank backed off. _ Unlike in the past when imports of for- eign capital were sought to help finance capital projects, since the 1980s this inflow has gone to budget deficits. Here, interest charges to service the deficit takes up to 30 per cent of all government revenues. Lowering interest rates has to be a top priority for the government. But lowering the rates — as has been clearly demon- strated over the past three years — hurts the Canadian dollar and endangers the inflow of foreign capital needed to finance the debt. Canada could find herself in the same situation as Australia which is forced to do its foreign borrowing in currencies other than its own. High rates do shore up the Canadian dollar, keep imported inflation down, reduce economic growth, employment and productivity, but even froma corporate sec- tor view this is no panacea. An economy in deep recession demands the lowering of interest rates and the cur- rency again becomes vulnerable to specula- tive attack on each new sign of economic weakness. High interest rates are premised on the notion that a high Canadian dollar is the most desirable of goals. But a high dollar benefits a very narrow section of capital. Raw materials, our major exports, are priced on the world market in U.S. dollars and have little to do with the value of the Canadian currency, A high dollar does assist Canadian capi- tal in moving into the U.S. market under free trade, but a higher dollar shrinks profits and production of Canadian manufactured » goods that would otherwise displace imports. This Current account deficit has to be financed with a larger net capital inflow. If MICHAEL WILSON the economy were allowed to expand, such a capital inflow would be forthcoming from a larger demand for Canadian stocks and goods. As real output is being depressed with high interest rates and an artificially high exchange rate, Canada is forced into the futile strategy of trying to attract and retain more hot money with an ever increasing interest rate. High interest rates bring long term prob- lems by making investment and improve- ments to Canadian business impossible. This erodes the long term productivity of business and results in permanent high long term unemployment. In addition, high interest rates add to the budget deficit which in turn the government attempts to off set with higher taxes. That reduced purchasing power leads to an increased number of jobless, further drain- ing the budget through welfare and other social payments. Canada is the only major industrial capi- talist economy that is currently increasing marginal tax rates, placing a surtax on mid- dle incomes and instituting a consumption tax. Under a regime of lower tax rates and lower interest rates, the exchange rate on the dollar would not decline as much as it even- tually would because of current economic policy. Instead Canada would be able to break its addicted dependence on this prec- arious flow of hot money. “We have no choice but to fight this corporate agenda,” he declared to applause. One union or group is not enough to fight this corporate agenda, said Parrot, urging greater unity between labour and other groups and stronger local labour councils. The CUPW president praised organiza- tions like the National Action Caucus for the Status of Women, Rural Dignity, and the Pro-Canada Network, the latter organization being the key force behind the national protest last April that saw 2.2 million Canadians vote against the GST. “We have to accept April 7 and 9 (the balloting days of the anti-GST campaign) as just the beginning,” said Parrot in cal- ling for a program of escalating actions including national days of protest. And the protest must also table a pro- gram that includes converting arms pro- duction to peacetime use, improving public services and ending privatization, he said. Turning to the situation at Canada Post, Parrot slammed the federal govern- ment for ignoring a special committee’s recommendations against plans to privat- ize the Crown corporation. “If postal workers have to go out on strike on the issue of privatization, we will make it clear that we’re on strike for ser- vice, but we’re also on strike against cheap labour,” he asserted. African National Congress representa- tive Peter Mahlangu, speaking for the South African Congress of Trade Unions, said workers in his country forced a kind of recognition from the apartheid govern- ment of the international workers’ holiday by striking in increasing numbers each against GST. May Day. Thanks to people’s struggles the State of © Emergency has been partially lifted, some people are beginning to return from exile, and talks are beginning with the govern- ment, which is part of the struggle, he noted. “For us to be talking to the government is not a compromise because we've said the bottom line is one person, one vote,” Mahlangu declared. The ANC is talking about nationalizing key industries in a free South Africa, and Mahlangu characterized the fight of one as capitalism versus socialism. Some critics JEAN-CLAUDE PARROT ... April 7, 9 should be just beginning of campaign Parrot marks May Day with unity call say socialism is a dying system, but “maybe we want to experience for our- selves some of the new system,” he said to appreciative laughter. Mahlangu urged trade unionists to con- tinue supporting sanctions against the racist regime “until you get the word from our organizations.” The cabaret, organized by the Van- couver Trade Union Mayday Committee and presented as a part of Mayworks fes- tivities, included performances by singers Holly Arntzen, Linda Chobotuck and Pierre Fournier, and poet Lindsay Kenyon. Union hits health care privatizing The Hospital Employees Union last week demanded that the provincial government review its policy of privatization in the health care field following revelations of conflict-of-interest in contract bidding and an admission by the provincial auditor- general that the government does not get enough information to assess the cost- effectiveness of private versus public con- tracts. HEU secretary-business manager Car- mela Allevato said that the health ministry is forcing hospitals to contract-out laundry facilities to the private sector by refusing the necessary funding to upgrade existing facili- ties, many of which are aging. But “hospitals are going into privatiza- tion without proper assessments of the costs and benefits,” she charged. Ina letter to the union April 5, Auditor- General George Morfitt acknowledged that his own department’s annual report for 1989 stated: “‘Our audits assessed whether the ministry has suitable processes to ensure it is getting value for the funds spent on health ... (and) concluded ... the Ministry does not collect enough information to know how cost-effective the hospital servi- ces it pays for are.” At the same time, however, Morfitt declined the union’s request that he investi- gate allegations of conflict-of-interest in the awarding of hospital laundry contracts at Vancouver General Hospital and Comox- Strathcona Regional Hospital to K-Bro Linen Systems Ltd. Provincial Ombuds- man Stephen Owen also turned down the union’s request for a probe. The allegations were raised in an article in the March issue of Equity magazine which revealed that K-Bro was awarded the con- tract to build the $7-million off-site laundry facility at VGH even though it was finally the only company bidding on the contract and many of the contract tender documents were based on the design of an already- existing K-Bro plant in Edmonton. Even Little Mountain Socred MLAs Doug Mowat and Grace McCarthy had warned in a letter to former health minister Peter Dueck that the contract could prove to be a political embarrassment. “Surely, it should be government policy that all government contractors be pre- cluded from bidding on their own recom- mendations,” the letter stated. K-Bro also has a construction-manage- ment contract to build a laundry in Cum- berland for the Comox-Strathcona Regional District and is reportedly slated to build a laundry adjacent to Kamloops’ Royal Inland Hospital. But all of that scheduled privatization should be put up to public scrutiny. said Allevato. “Our experience at VGH and elsewhere shows that taxpayers: gain nothing from privatizations,” she said. Pacific Tribune, May 7, 1990 « 3 ti | } } } } } } i 4 i 5 | { }