, QUEBEC TODAY Trotskyite nationalists By SAM WALSH The current issue of the Trotskyite French-language paper de- votes an entire page to “An Answer to the Communist Party: In Defense of Nationalism and the Struggle for Unilingualism.” Apparently they are annoyed because in December we wrote that unilingualism is “the other side of the coin of discrimination and of coercion . . . The fact that the Trotskyites have adopted this dangerously nationalist demand is a measure of their opportunism, trying to make nationalists out of internationalist workers instead of the contrary.” ; Because they have the impudence to refer to Lenin, dishonestly, “in the same way as Trotsky,” in order to defend nationalism and unilingualism—the battle cries of the French-Canadian petty bour- gecisie—we shall quote Lenin on the policy the working class should fight for in face of the pressure coming from the bourgeoisie of the oppressed nation. In passing we shall cite Lenin on Trotsky’s ' opportunist policy precisely on the national question. 4 i yy Finally we shall have something to say on the incredible argu- ment of the Trotskyites that Italo-Canadian workers who oppose unilingualism should be considered strikebreakers! : All the following quotations are from Lenin’s ‘Collected Works,” Volume 20: : e “Working-class democracy contraposes to the nationalist wrangling of the various bourgeois parties over questions of lan- guage, etc., the demand for the unconditional unity and complete amalgamation of workers of all nationalities in all working-class organisations’. . .” (Page 22). e “Bourgeois nationalism and proletarian internationalism — these are the two irreconcilably hostile slogans that correspond to the two great class camps throughout the capitalist world, and express the two policies (nay, the two world out!ooks) in the national question. Despite all their r-r-revolutionary pretensions, there is no need to ask in which of these two camps the Trotskyites are to be found. . e “If a Ukrainian (read French-Canadian) Marxist allows him- self to be swayed by his quite legitimate and natural hatred of the Great-Russian (read Anglophone) oppressors (written in .1913 in- tsarist Russia, S.W.) to such a degree that he transfers even a particle of this hatred, even if it be only estrangement, to the proletarian culture and proletarian cause of the Great-Russian workers, then such a Marxist will get bogged down in bourgeois nationalism.” (Page 33). Not to speak of hatred towards poor immi- grant Italian workers who want to learn English to make a living. e “That is why Russian Marxists say that there must be no compulsory official language, that the population must be provided with schools where teaching will be carried on in all the local languages, that a fundamental law must be introduced in the con- stitution declaring invalid all privileges of any one nation and all violations of the rights of national minorities.” (Page 73). It takes Trotskyites to dare pretend Lenin could support unilingualism! ism! e “Insofar 2s the bourgeoisie of the oppressed nation fights the oppressor, we are always, in every case, and more strongly than anyone else, in favor, for we are the staunchest and the most consistent enemies of oppression. But insofar as the bourgeoisie of the oppressed nations stands for its own bourgeois nationalism, we stand against. We fight against the privileges and violence of the oppressor nation, and do not iri any way condone strivings for privileges on the part of the oppressed nation.” (Page 411). Clear enough, Messrs. French and English unilingualists? @ “Why did Trotsky withhold these facts from the readers of his journal? Only because it pays him to speculate on fomenting dif- ferences between the Polish and the Russian opponents of liquida- tionism-and to deceive the Russian workers on the question of the program. : “Trotsky has never yet held a firm opinion on any important question of Marxism. He always contrives to worm his way into the cracks of any given difference of opinion, and desert one side for the other.” (Page 447). So much for the Trotskyists and the ‘Re bourgeois publicists who come to their aid in raising Trotsky up to the level of Lenin. e “It is not difficult to understand that the recognition by the Marxists of the whole of Russia, and first and foremost by the Great Russians, of the right of nations to secede in no way pre- cludes agitation against secession by Marxists of a particular oppressed nation, just as the right to divorce does not preclude agitation against divorce in a particular case. We think, therefore, that there will be an inevitable increase in the number of Polish (and let us add, Quebec) Marxists who laugh at the non-existent ‘contradiction’ now being ‘encouraged’ by Semkovsky and Trotsky.” Finally the Trotskyites in their article say: “Is it the struggle for French unilingualism which divides the workers? . . . All struggles create divisions. Whether it be a strike .. .; the result of all strug- gle is a polarization even among the workers. Should a strike be broken in a factory where 10-15% of the workers are against . . .? The language struggle in St. Leonard comes in this category.” It will be recalled that the Italo-Canadian workers of St. Leonard experienced the withdrawal of their right to have their children _ taught in English, which, unfortunately, is still the language of work in Quebec. The Italians constitute not 10% of the population of St. Leonard but over 40%. Many Italian Canadians of St. Leonard were on the picket line at Seyen-Up just a few days before the disastrous anti-Italian nationalist riot, in which the Trotskyites participated. The Italo-Canadians, together with the Indians, are the only ethnic groups in Quebec with an annual income below that of the French-Canadians. But the demonstration was aimed against them. Evidently the Trotskyites consider them scabs. In this, as everywhere, the Trotskyites, like the nationalist ex- tremists, play the game of the bourgeoisie in dividing the working class according to nationality, as did their “theoretician’”’ and false guide, Trotsky, both before and after the revolution in Russia. Bee AS ie RR aE ee ee EG PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 18,'1972—PAGE 6 oe an By JOHN WEIR Capitalist parties have a pro- gram, but they prefer to keep it hidden behind a lot of fine- sounding verbiage. Their pro- gram is to maintain the rule of the monopolies and perpetuate the system of exploiting the people. The first they call “democracy” and the second “free enterprise’. But what they really operate on is their -electoral ‘ platforms, which are composed of assurances to big business on the one hand and vote-catching bait for the pub- lic on the other. The trickery and hypocricy of capitalist poli- ‘tics has become _- proverbial until the world “politician” is associated in the public mind with “swindler” and parliament- ary elections are seen. as a “show”. That’s not to say that “the old-time magic” does not work any more, The habit of genera- tions is a powerful force. The media in the hands of the mono- polists can still spark illusions despite all past disillusionments. The old harpy can get her face lifted and pretend something fresh is being offered. In fact, “charisma”, “personality”, “im- age’”’ are today increasingly be- ing offered the electorate in lieu of a program or even a platform by capitalist (and even social- reformist) politicians. That’s not to say that there aren’t any capitalist works on social and political questions; there are all kinds of them and more are being: written all the time. But no matter how learned they may appear, from which- ever angle they may seek to bolster the capitalist system or to demolish its opponents, none of them bases itself on a truly scientific study of the laws gov- erning the development of hu- man society. At most they trace some one feature or process and that only within definite limits. But there are quite objective laws governing society and so- cial science that»studies those laws, bares the hidden direction in which it is moving, points out the things people must do to lead to.a higher stage of human progress. That science is Marxism-Le- ninism. es ee There is only one party in Canada that applies this science to the best of its ability in order to produce a program that as closely as possible corresponds to the actual conditions in the country, the developments that are now taking place and their most probable direction in the future, and on this sound scien- tific foundation outlines the long-range tasks of the Canadian working people. That is the Communist Party of Canada. The Party’s program, titled ada, was adopted after thorough Spanish Economics Official figures put Spain’s sales to Common Market coun- tries at $857 million. Its pur- chases amount to $1,322.5 mil- lion. Foreign investment in Spain in 1971 alone amounted to $339 million with West Ger- many being the largest investor ($30 million), followed by the U.S. ($20.5 million). However many West European investors are in reality United States- owned firms. 31.63% of Spain’s chemical industry. 12.77% of its real estate and 12.28% of its nslated from Combat) | owned. ee ; Se OL 8 AAR aR rt dk FRO BR 8 Ri Mae wwe - lines tasks for a shorter period, - this policy into points for gov- change.. And there is a- The Road to Socialism in Can-~ electrical industry are foreign” CP AMIR OR & B26 Bhd 8 aww we © Oe Bl ae Sele discussion by the delegates at the 2lst (50th Anniversary) convention in Toronto last Nov- ember. It was based on a redraft of the previous program, which was published, debated by the entire membership at meetings and in a special bulletin, with many Suggestions and proposals, finally these were taken up point by point at the convention, dis- cussed by the delegates and voted on. There is no other party that can boast such democratic scrupulousness in adopting its guidelines. The Policy Statement adopted at the convention, which out-- capitalism and the era of sq ist revolution in our OWA ¢ try. As experience accumy and knowledge grows, th€ teac¢ ings of Marxism-LeniniSm enriched. Thus The Road to Socialism Canada draws both on the jp; national Jessons and ex ences and on the exp€rien, study and thought in Canag, during the 50 years of the po, munist Party. : Opportunist “trimming” sails to suit the wind” or Gogma. tic repetition of “sayiNgs» foreign to Communism, Communist theory is a Buide tp action — action not “by | Party, for the Party’, but > posals for what the Wor; class and democratic forces the country should do — by people, for the people. Of eo further discussion and. g¢ during joint action and Ney ws periences bring in their Corre, tives and additions. But the ciples of scientific S¢jaj; always remain the searchligi r. that throws light on the ,>) ahead. Ey The Road to Socialism in ada is the guideline for @.. dian Communists. And fo, who are seeking the Wa progress it is an indisPenga handbook. ae a the next two-three years, flows out of this program. The elec- ticn platform, which translates ernmental and public action which the Communist Party pro- jects and promotes on the hust- ings, is based on that program, The Road to Socialism in Can- ada is the program expressing the collective will of the Com- ‘munist Party membership. It is at the same time the reaffirma- tion of the principles of scienti- fic socialism that were first pre- sented by Marx and Engels in The Manifesto of the Communist Party in 1848 and which have stood the test of history, and of the additions made by Lenin’s Full text of the program of the Communist Party of Canada as odon, ~ by delegates attending the 21st (50th Anniversary) Convention hely < Toronto Nov. 27-26, 1971. Section headings are as follows: % 1. Our Aim is a Socialist Canada . State-Monopoly Capitalism in Canada . The Canadian People and the Capitalist State . The People’s Struggle against Monopoly and U.S. Domination A Democratic Anti-Monopoly Government . The Socialist State and the Building of a Socialist Society 8. The Communist Party PRICE: 75 CENTS NUBWH eee eee eee eee ol ie | order from: ~ d PROGRESS BOOKS, 487 Adelaide St. West, Toronto 133, Canug ! or your local bookstore. Sg | | NAME a ; ls ] AppREss | I cn 2 ty} y Prov., State one, Zip | Number of copies Enc. $ : I Add 25 cents for U.S. cheques ts Poe ga ew