New union of jobless announced Unemployed workers in Van- Couver, active in the campaign for the B.C. Federation of Labor’s Citizens Lobby for Jobs, an- nounced this week the formation of the Greater Vancouver Union of the Unemployed. The GVUU, which initially began aS a committee of unemployed Working with the Federation, in- tends to offer assistance to the unemployed with such things as unemployment insurance but will _ focus particularly on organizing to demand government action to Create jobs. “There are three faces to unemployment,” Michael Kauf- Man, GVUU_ executive co- ordinator, told a press conference Tuesday. ‘‘The first is the Statistical — which shows more unemployed people than at any tiem since the 1930’s. “The second is the hardship Suffered by jobless workers, hardship that was reflected in the 3,000 questionnaires returned to the B.C. Federation of Labor. “And finally,’ Kaufman said “there is the third face. Unem- ployed people are angry, they realize they’re getting a bad deal te and want to do something about 1 band He said that the GVUU represents ‘‘a big step forward”’ in giving the unemployed a voice. The union will be working out of -an office at 517 East Broadway in Vancouver where it will also be holding regular meetings. The phone number is 872-7331. Coal miners’ strike solid Continued from pg. 1 help needy miners. It also asked the membership to contribute $1 a month to the relief fund. Collections of food, including fresh meat and produce, from U.S. farmers who themselves have been on strike, have also aided thousands of miners and their families. In pledging their support of the miners, trade unionists condemned the action of the Carter ad- ministration in invoking the Strikebreaking law, seen as a threat to the entire labor movement. .U.S. president Carter’s use of the strikebreaking legislation against the UMW came last week as the 160,000 miners voted over- whelmingly to reject the contract proposals which would have taken away critical health, safety and Pension benefits established in earlier agreements. The proposed contract would have given up the 1974 health ac- count which provided for some 50 health clinics, considered of vital importance to miners and their families in Appalachia. The Miners, who received full medical Coverage under the 1974 contract, Would also ‘have been obliged to Pay the first $50 in drug costs, $150 in doctors’ fees and $125 in hospital Costs. Particularly important are Safety issues. The contract rejected by the mineworkers would have given the company the right to fire a safety committeeman Should it later be determined that he was not justified in pulling Workers off the job because of Safety hazards. Miners have Placed particular emphasis on this issue because of unsafe conditions in many mines throughout the Country. JOBS #2 SS — —Sean Griffin photo Executive co-ordinator Michael Kaufman (right) told a press conference Wednesday that the unemployed had a voice and an organization with the formation, announced this week, of the Greater Vancouver Union of the Unemployed. With him is Colin Snell, chairman of the Vancouver and District Labor Council’s committee on unemployment. ‘Replace Eckardt commission’—CP Provincial Communist Party leader Maurice Rush called Wednesday for the dissolution of the Eckardt Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and for its replacement by an_ all-party commission. Judge L. S. Eckardt, a former deputy magistrate in the Yukon, was appointed by premier Bennett January 12 to conduct an inquiry into electoral reform in the province. Although hearings are scheduled to begin only this week, he has been under pressure to prepare a report quickly, possibly in anticipation of an early election. That apparent haste un- derscored the demand for the commission’s dissolution voiced by the Communist Party which pointed out that it had received permission to make a submission before the commission — two days after the deadline for the delivery of written briefs. Rush said that a note from Judge Eckardt was received in the CP office on March 15 with an enclosed advertisement stating that written briefs should be submitted to the commission “not later than March 13, 1978.” The letter was postmarked March 14. _ “That illustrates the entirely inadequate nature of the present inquiry,” Rush said in a letter to premier Bennett Wednesday. He stressed that the manner in which the commission was established, the haste with which it was proceeding and the appointment as sole commissioner a man who ran for the government party — Eckardt was a Social Credit candidate in West Vancouver- Howe Sound in 1966 — “lends support to public suspicion that the present commission is an exercise aimed at strengthening the Socreds’ grip on public office.” > Rush said that the Communist Party considers as long overdue electoral reform that would “strengthen the democratic process and increase public par- ticipation. “In the public interest, we believe that the present com- mission should be dissovled and a proper commission, represen- tative of all political parties, be established, and that adequate time be provided for serious participation by all political parties, public-spirited groups and the general public,”’ he said. Housing, transit top jobs program Continued from pg. 1 only alderman Marzari and Harcourt would support council participation in the Lobby, but they were joined by aldermen Brown, Ford and Bellamy in voting to endorse the Lobby. Aldermen Gibson, Gerrard and Puil and mayor Volrich voted against. On another vote, however, council voted unanimously to consider the proposals of the Vancouver Labor Council and to prepare a program of capital works spending by the city to create jobs. © The detailed Labor Council brief, presented by council secretary- treasurer Paddy Neale, asked the city to embark on a job creation program itself, and to join in pressuring the provincial and federal government for full em- ployment policies. Among the main points in the VLC brief were: e That the city embark on a substantial program of con- struction of low rental housing. “There has been no time in recent years when a massive attack on this problem would be as beneficial as at the present,”’ the submission stated. ‘“‘Not only would con- struction employment be provided in any major new housing projects in Vancouver, but the economic stimulus would be immense.’’ The city controls suitable land, the demand is present and capital assistance is available from senior governments, the VLC said,. ‘‘All that is required is the initiative and determination.”’ e That the city should speed up planning for a light rapid transit system and make an early start on the LRT system. ‘‘A multi-million dollar rapid transit construction project would provide massive amounts of employment anda very great economic stimulus,’’ the VLC said. = e That the city should reconsider the capital works projects from the Parks Board that were narrowly defeated in the 1976 referendum. Involved in that vote was $12 million. in construction and renovation of fields and facilities and another $10 million in the construction of ice rinks and pools. “Aware of the need to provide jobs, the public, we are confident would approve of reconsideration of these previously rejected projects,” the brief commented. ‘ e That the city should pressure the provincial government to reduce the sales tax to five per cent and put an additional $200 million of spending power into the economy. e That the city should urge the provincial government not to allow any further plant, mine or mill closures. e That the city should press the federal government for an early ~ start on the promised drydock expansion on Burrard Inlet. The Labor Council submission | COPE PRESIDENT BRUCE YORKE... job-creating rapid transit development. was backed up by COPE president Bruce Yorke who stressed the need for a beginning of construction of a light rapid transit system to provide jobs. The LRT system is Vancouver’s ‘number one civic priority’, Yorke said, “‘which would do more to alleviate the scourge of unemployment and stagnation in this city than any other single project.” If pressure was brought to bear on the provincial and federal governments it would be possible to begin construction by mid 1978, he declared. Yorke called for city hall leadership that would ‘turn the town upside down.” He said that the city should call a massive presses demand for public meeting in the Orpheum Theatre to let Victoria and Ottawa “feel the heat from Vancouver citizens.” The city should then call on the provincial government to honor its commitment to put up 37_ per cent of the costs with Ottawa paying an equal amount, and then “systematically visit every public | organization in this city, to get the kind of citizen involvement that alone will force Ottawa and Vic- toria to move.” The Downtown Eastside Residents’ Association, in its submission, agreed that the “obvious” thing the city could do was to “pressure the federal and provincial governments for the money they always seem to be promising for light rapid transit.” DERA also advocated a start on new housing projects in the downtown eastside by the city, and assistance from the city in securing more subsidies for low rental housing projects. In ad- dition, it contended, if the city enforced standard of maintenance bylaws ‘“‘this would put electrical, plumbing, carpentry, construction and janitorial workers back to work.’ To enforce the bylaw doesn’t cost the city anything, DERA noted. Submissions to council by the B.C. Student Federation and the Greater Vancouver Union of the Unemployed stressed the growing hardships faced by the unem- ployed, and in particular by women, youth and students. The GVUU told council that “‘the few job creation programs that exist are a joke.” It asked the council to initiate socially valuable public work projects and to support the March 30 jobs lobby by declaring the day a civic holiday. The BCSF pointed out that young people face an unemployment rate two and a half times that for those over 25 years, and a full 25 per cent of students were jobless last summer. The student organization called for ‘‘massive direct job creation as the best possible direct short term action to deal with unem- ployment.” PACIFIC TRIBUNE—MARCH 17, 1978—Page 3 i